8/30/2008 9:19:33 PM
Just saw this on campusblender.
8/30/2008 9:45:39 PM
^ Andrew Sullivan's more confused than a rodeo clown on acid. The favorable information concerning Palin that I posted is corroborated by three different sources (at least) and represents the opinions of many people--not just one guy who's all over the sociopolitical map.
8/30/2008 10:07:09 PM
^ I don't know if you are just reading talking points rather than reading the links, but favorable != getting votes. My link notes she has a high favorability, but that still doesn't mean she's getting votes (which at this point in time, she's not).
8/30/2008 10:10:29 PM
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/30/palin-booed-for-mentioning-hillary-clinton/
8/30/2008 10:30:25 PM
I've told you all here before that Biden is a loose cannon who hasn't been exactly right in the head since they drilled it some years ago. Biden struggles to tame hyperbole, quips
8/30/2008 11:42:10 PM
^If you want to talk about saying inappropriate things, how about these for McCain's VP pick.Besides already saying she hasn't really thought about & doesn't know anything about Iraq, she also said:Palin: "As for that VP talk all the time, I'll tell you, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day?"
8/31/2008 1:18:00 PM
^^ Are you kidding me? McCain has the biggest problem with hyperbole IN THE HISTORY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD (get it?)."I received the highest award from literally every veteran’s organization in America."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBz41Wl2BwIGuantanomo Bay "may be one of the nicest places in the world to live in."http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQZP7hrCS4I"I've supported every investigation and ways of finding out what caused the tragedy" of Katrina.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ng9q4L3_vU"I believed Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction as did every intelligence agency in the world and every assessment. "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esy8O1_C5UU]
8/31/2008 1:40:56 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7591049.stm
8/31/2008 8:23:03 PM
9/1/2008 12:45:21 AM
9/1/2008 3:20:07 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/story//realclearpolitics/20080829/cm_rcp/barack_obama_offers_a_beautifu
9/4/2008 1:54:06 PM
^I don't understand the point you're trying to make. I also don't see any point in that article besides another attempt to associate "Obama" with "communism."
9/4/2008 1:55:31 PM
Just somebody's opinion of Obama's speech, pointing out the problems and contradictions he saweverybody else was doing the same to Palin's speech
9/4/2008 1:57:35 PM
Robert Tracinski is nothing more than an Ayn Rand Ojectivist fool.
9/4/2008 1:58:16 PM
who?
9/4/2008 2:00:19 PM
9/4/2008 2:43:46 PM
37,244,000 turned in for Palin's speech, according to Drudge.So much for me thinking TT's 28 million viewers was too aggressive.
9/4/2008 3:21:32 PM
TT's?
9/4/2008 3:29:28 PM
9/4/2008 3:29:55 PM
the real question is WHY were people tuned in.its obviously for very different reasons.
9/4/2008 3:32:50 PM
9/4/2008 3:34:19 PM
there were a good number of people in my office today who watched it and have no intention of voting for mccain/palin[Edited on September 4, 2008 at 3:36 PM. Reason : ^^]
9/4/2008 3:34:55 PM
9/4/2008 3:34:58 PM
9/4/2008 3:36:54 PM
The initials I saw last night were about 14 million less. I have a feeling though, that Walnuts won't draw that large of an audience. People tuned in basically to find out who the hell the snowbilly was/is.
9/4/2008 3:37:07 PM
The real question is can the top of their ticket compete with the bottom of the ticket in having his voice heard.
9/4/2008 3:37:48 PM
I'm interested to see how many people tune in to watch mccain tonight vs obama on o'reilly.
9/4/2008 3:40:07 PM
Far more will tune in to see McCain than Obama on O'Reilly, simply because of a smaller viewership for cable and one cable channel then for network TV and the other news channels.
9/4/2008 3:44:44 PM
true.
9/4/2008 3:48:06 PM
hot damndid you see the DNC?over 100,000 people with nothing better to do on a weeknight. no wonder democrats can't hold a job or make money.I'd want to tax the "rich" too!
9/4/2008 4:02:49 PM
do you even attempt to be logical anymore?
9/4/2008 4:05:24 PM
^^"over 100,000 people with nothing better to do on a weeknight."and on a sat night after midnight you were on that troll account posting about how others had nothing better to do:"nobodies proved she was ever pregnant. unless you seriously believe the rant of a communist on dailykos with nothing better to do than look at her daughters stomach in pictures and make random acusations"which somehow makes people watching a news event on a weeknight seem less pathetic[Edited on September 4, 2008 at 4:16 PM. Reason : .]
9/4/2008 4:11:00 PM
^ come on man, don't be so stupid as to be baited out by this brain-addled troll.
9/4/2008 4:51:01 PM
9/4/2008 4:54:44 PM
you were off by more than the population of Alaska and 100x the population of Wasila.[Edited on September 4, 2008 at 4:58 PM. Reason : .]
9/4/2008 4:57:46 PM
aha good one, sir. would that i had thought it myself.
9/4/2008 5:22:30 PM
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/04/after-palin-speech-obama-has-record-10-million-day/
9/4/2008 10:47:37 PM
9/4/2008 11:19:28 PM
57 states. lol
9/4/2008 11:29:35 PM
9/5/2008 11:34:18 PM
I saw on CNN Obama raked in 10 mil in 1 day of the convention (not sure how much they got over all), but alot of people watching were getting fired up on the left and deciding to donate. I think who was watching and how they responded matters a lot to that number. (& over that same time period McCain's side only raised 1 mil)
9/6/2008 6:57:20 AM
Once again, joe is on the wrong side of a bet.
9/6/2008 8:38:16 AM
Here is an interesting breakdown:http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/09/04/us/politics/20080905_WORDS_GRAPHIC.htmlThe main priority of our new leader looks like it will either be change or god?
9/7/2008 9:56:23 AM
Really cool chart. And yeah, I was as surprised as anybody at the numbers for McCain's acceptance on Thursday night. I was totally wrong on that one.
9/7/2008 11:05:33 AM
^^ looks like Obama was more concerned about McCain & Bush than the issues and policies
9/7/2008 2:40:12 PM
those are single words, not topicsthe republicans do the same thing but instead of referring to Obama by name, they simply say "my opponent will raise your taxes" and "all he promises is change"and of course the republicans were gonna downplay the heck outta Bush...heck, the fact that he wasn't even there was a great stroke of luck for them[Edited on September 7, 2008 at 3:34 PM. Reason : +]
9/7/2008 3:16:06 PM
^^^^Rudy Giuliani referenced 9-11 only once.
9/7/2008 3:57:08 PM