ah that pesky n&o.
1/18/2009 11:48:00 AM
in other newsWall scored 41 last night.
1/18/2009 11:49:25 AM
^That's goood news for the non-NCSU team to which he commits.
1/18/2009 11:51:46 AM
we will get Wall.
1/18/2009 11:58:47 AM
we will hit a Wall
1/18/2009 12:19:23 PM
well shit, we've already hit it.like a bird.
1/18/2009 12:28:53 PM
don't worry, we got this.
1/18/2009 12:30:32 PM
from http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/tudor/story/1372046.html
1/18/2009 12:41:23 PM
can anyone verify if Wall was at the game yesterday? Rumor is that he was there?
1/18/2009 12:41:40 PM
Harrow was there, don't think Wall was.
1/18/2009 12:47:40 PM
They had a quick shot of wall during the game, unless I am mistaken. He was wearing a stylish plaid shirt.
1/18/2009 1:08:56 PM
Wall was in Missouri during out game
1/18/2009 1:12:01 PM
1/18/2009 1:22:40 PM
i wouldnt call -4 a heavy favorite.learn your lines or dont make comments about "heavy favorite"
1/18/2009 1:25:14 PM
4-12 would be overachieving at this juncture.
1/18/2009 1:25:36 PM
1/18/2009 1:27:06 PM
who's odds are we talking about then?You can make valid points on this credibility, but how the fuck can you consider us a big favorite? If you did, you were the only one to do so, as most everyone uses VEGAS LINES to declare big favorite & underdogI guess because you had high hopes that we would win by 15.[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:28:28 PM
he's just looking for another reason to talk shit about lowe...in case you havent noticed, thats all he does in this thread]
1/18/2009 1:28:55 PM
Haha right like I am the only one.Lowe gives me plenty of reasons to bitch.
1/18/2009 1:30:28 PM
it just shows that some people will find anything to bitch about.No matter who I pull for, I consider the spread a pretty accurate assessment on the direction the game could go in most of the time.So when a well researched and calculated line that the media and other sports fans use says -4, that means the game is a toss up.When you go in with unrealistic expectations of being a "big favorite" it just undermines anything else you say because people think you are an idiot
1/18/2009 1:31:22 PM
no you're not the only one, but it makes you sound pretty dumb when you try to make a wolfpack win sound like a bad thingbesides, we might have barely won that game, but we also BARELY LOST to a couple top-25 teams earlier in the year...where the fuck was the leeway for the losses?[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:32:22 PM
1/18/2009 1:36:18 PM
1/18/2009 1:36:46 PM
1/18/2009 1:37:03 PM
we shouldve won the marquette and davidson games?we shouldve blocked their lucky 25 foot buzzer beaters?[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:38 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:37:32 PM
let me guess you...A) don't think that a line is formulated based on a number of mathematical calculations/trends/etcB) Vegas does more research regarding a team than you ever could doC) The media doesnt vaguely use the line to refer to who is underdog/favoriteD) Dont have a clueI am going to vote for all of the aboveErnie, I've been a gambling for 5 years, I know what the point of the line is, I am just saying that when we are -4, how are we big favorites?If we were minus -10 to -12, I would say that we are big favorites, but not at -4Yes, the true point of a spread is to get even money on both sides to ensure vegas wins, but the spread is often times a good predictor on how the game will be played out. A game with a line of -20 isn't expected to be a close, but a game with a spread in the low to mid single digits indicates that the game could go either way and is reflected through the line.Furthermore, sites like Accuscore & Kenpom had us winning by 3 yesterday, again proving we were NEVER big favorites[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM. Reason : more info]
1/18/2009 1:38:20 PM
those obviously dont count for him because it would be a detriment to his whiningand
1/18/2009 1:39:23 PM
1/18/2009 1:41:28 PM
^Don't be too hard on him. He can't help it he's on his period.
1/18/2009 1:41:59 PM
Ah yes AC Slater bringing his usual to the argument: nothing. Yes, I think we should have beat Davidson and Marquette. Costner was playing lights out against Marquette and we blew it coming down the stretch. How could you say otherwise?Someone show the stats of Herb's players vs Sid's for yesterday's game since that was a big deal after FSU. Herb players did everything in the game yesterday....
1/18/2009 1:42:32 PM
Reading comprehension
1/18/2009 1:43:04 PM
go post in the asu thread if all you want to do is suck herb's dickand if you watched the asu/ucla game you'd notice how ucla's playcalling in the last 2-3 minutes was absolutely pathetic...passing around the perimeter for 32 seconds then jacking up a three...talk about handing someone a win on a silver platter[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:43:05 PM
Well it was funny after FSU it was like Lowe's recruits have carried us all year and Herb's players have done nothing.McCauley, Costner, Ferguson, and Horner played the best yesterday. All Herb recruits. Just a fact.
1/18/2009 1:44:45 PM
you're not even wiling to give sid time to get his recruits
1/18/2009 1:45:34 PM
i think he'd fuck herb if given the chancebut that has no relation to this thread
1/18/2009 1:46:10 PM
What like Tracy Smith, his best recruit, whom he doesn't even play?Tracy played like 8 mins yesterday. Pathetic.[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:48 PM. Reason : ^I just defend Herb, I know he's not coming back, but running him off is why we are stuck with Lowe]
1/18/2009 1:46:51 PM
We won a game yesterday and you're doing nothing but bitching. Pathetic.ps: Herb Sendek was not fired, he quit[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:48 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:47:33 PM
1/18/2009 1:49:04 PM
So you were happy with the game yesterday just because we won?We played like ass. That's like saying you were happy when we beat fucking Loyola by 2 damn points.[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 1:50 PM. Reason : ^I was in 103 yesterday while most of you were on here posting.....FWIW]
1/18/2009 1:49:40 PM
1/18/2009 1:51:20 PM
1/18/2009 1:53:24 PM
and if you have been betting ever, you would know that a +4 team has a decent chance to win the game outright. I said a toss up, i.e either team can win.Keep trying
1/18/2009 1:55:32 PM
yes i am happy about the win
1/18/2009 1:55:47 PM
1/18/2009 1:57:33 PM
You keep saying I'm bitching and whining but I attend every game....just trying to prove that I want us to do well as much as anyone. I have been a WPC member and season ticket holder for four years and I'm still in school.
1/18/2009 1:58:42 PM
packboozie i just think you need to give it one more year before you're so critical of what Lowe doesbe a fan and enjoy a win when we get one...enjoy it more than a win over Loyola since its actually an ACC game...BC beat UNC then lost to Harvard...its a tough league, any win is good, especially when you're rebuilding a program...save the criticism until after a bad loss, not a win[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 2:01 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2009 1:59:52 PM
1/18/2009 2:00:10 PM
please to keep arguing semanticsi really wish you'd step off my nuts already trollbaityou must still be personally upset that you have been called out for being an ignorant troll for about 8-10 pages[Edited on January 18, 2009 at 2:02 PM. Reason : ,]
1/18/2009 2:01:15 PM
1/18/2009 2:03:05 PM
i forgot that anyone who doesnt agree with your statements that Lowe is the worst coach ever must be stupid.you are right, sorry about that
1/18/2009 2:18:56 PM