I was thinking about BC after seeing how bad Notre Dame is, making the first GT win less impressive.
9/15/2007 7:02:28 PM
9/15/2007 7:21:54 PM
I almost took Arkansas... haha
9/15/2007 7:40:07 PM
Fuck it...taking the points and BC
9/15/2007 7:40:58 PM
I was going to suggest the Under on the Bama/Arkansas game
9/15/2007 7:42:57 PM
I took BC and the under
9/15/2007 7:43:05 PM
I took GT -6.5
9/15/2007 8:11:59 PM
USC -10FSU -5NW(-16.5)Hawaii (-17)
9/15/2007 8:16:27 PM
Why didn't I bet on the USC game???? I didn't even look at that line, I figured it would be way to high... Damn.. If I would've known it was 10.5 I would've jumped all over USC
9/15/2007 8:33:46 PM
Question, I have Navy -7. The game is going into overtime. If Navy scored a TD in overtime, would they still kick the PAT?
9/15/2007 8:36:05 PM
depends on when they score.. If its the first score of OT then yes, if its the 2nd score and the other team didnt score or only kicked a FG then no.
9/15/2007 8:37:25 PM
I take it you know how college OT worksthey'd kick the PT if they scored firstIf the other team didn't score or got a FG, they wouldn't need to kick the PT
9/15/2007 8:38:07 PM
your best outcome is that Navy scores a TD first and holds the other team scoreless.
9/15/2007 8:46:48 PM
Hawaii/UNLV over 67
9/15/2007 9:26:24 PM
Im on that too ^
9/15/2007 9:28:02 PM
9/15/2007 9:28:03 PM
no... best outcome would be that... and then on the other teams possession they throw an INT that is ran back for a td to win by 14
9/15/2007 9:33:48 PM
oh yeah.. I forgot about the 3rd OT deal...^ in your scenario The team would win by 13, after the INT there would be no need to kick the PAT.
9/15/2007 9:46:52 PM
sigh3rd OTyou have to go for 26+2=8then they intercept the other team8+6=14
9/15/2007 9:51:59 PM
^yeah, but in terms of beating the spread, there's no difference between 8 and 14so the interception return is unnecessary
9/15/2007 9:52:59 PM
Fuck, I should have bet on Oregon instead of UCLA. Oh well.And what the hell is up with Duke beating NW 20-7 at the half? [Edited on September 15, 2007 at 9:58 PM. Reason : b]
9/15/2007 9:56:15 PM
WTF
9/15/2007 10:28:10 PM
So how much are you up with those parlays?
9/15/2007 10:30:14 PM
bama is pushing for the push
9/15/2007 10:31:53 PM
Wow, Arkansas just pissed that game away big time.Ok St -10.5 LCincy -7.5WMinnesota -7 LFlorida -8WNavy -7LArkansas +3TieLousville -6So Cal -10Boise St. -12Northwestern -16.5LUNC -3LOklahoma u64WIllinoise o43.5 WFSU -5Boise St -12tOSU -3WGT -6.5LUCLA -16.5L[Edited on September 15, 2007 at 10:43 PM. Reason : Shitty Night]
9/15/2007 10:37:09 PM
haha glad i stayed away from that shit
9/15/2007 10:38:19 PM
Why? It would have been a push. Don't your sites give you your money back on a tie? I know SI does.
9/15/2007 10:40:24 PM
i told yall about kentuckymy moneyline play looking good
9/15/2007 10:46:09 PM
UL is a better team and they'll win but Kragthorpe made some bad coaching decisions tonight. This game should be over.
9/15/2007 10:48:40 PM
9/15/2007 10:50:48 PM
told you guys big W with kentucky moneyline
9/15/2007 11:12:43 PM
dammit, I want to go ahead and mark down USC and BC as wins but i will curse myself
9/15/2007 11:22:03 PM
^Happened to me with Boise St.
9/15/2007 11:40:31 PM
ok, going to go ahead and mark down USC and GT under as winsWEEK 3here are my "stone cold, lead pipe, take them out behind the woodshed" locks for Week 3. Not a whole lot that I REALLY like this week though.... Year-to-date record in parentheses. * (4-6)Missouri -20 W. Michigan (have to ride this money train until they let me down) -WUNC -3 vs Virginia - L** (4-3)Tennessee +7 vs IndianapolisCincinnati -7 vs Miami (Ohio) - W*** (10-3)USC -10 vs Nebraska - WNew Orleans -3 vs Tampa BayFSU -4.5 vs ColoradoBC vs. GT U48 - WIllinois vs. Syracuse O43 - WIowa State +17.5 vs. Iowa - W**** (6-0)Cincinnati -7 vs. ClevelandFlorida -8 vs Tennessee - WOklahoma vs Utah State U63.5 - W***** (2-0)undefeated for the year on my 4 and 5 stars, and 18-3 on 3 stars and up... saddle up and ride fuckers, I got yo back[Edited on September 16, 2007 at 12:02 AM. Reason : d]
9/15/2007 11:49:04 PM
I think I actually like the Falcons +10.5 tomorrow at the Jags.
9/16/2007 12:29:36 AM
yeah, and I am debating Oakland tomorrow
9/16/2007 12:30:23 AM
Are you being sarcastic or serious? lol
9/16/2007 12:33:35 AM
seriousDenver beat them by 4 and 10 last year and Oakland is at least a little better...probably not taking it, but I am considering it
9/16/2007 12:36:51 AM
Jesus, I think FSU is actually about to blow the spread.
9/16/2007 1:43:16 AM
yeah no shit, I will be furioussweet jesus...WEEK 3here are my "stone cold, lead pipe, take them out behind the woodshed" locks for Week 3. Not a whole lot that I REALLY like this week though.... Year-to-date record in parentheses. * (4-6)Missouri -20 W. Michigan (have to ride this money train until they let me down) -WUNC -3 vs Virginia - L** (4-3)Cincinnati -7 vs Miami (Ohio) - WTennessee +7 vs Indianapolis*** (11-3)USC -10 vs Nebraska - WFSU -4.5 vs Colorado - WBC vs. GT U48 - WIllinois vs. Syracuse O43 - WIowa State +17.5 vs. Iowa - WNew Orleans -3 vs Tampa Bay**** (6-0)Florida -8 vs Tennessee - WOklahoma vs Utah State U63.5 - WCincinnati -7 vs. Cleveland***** (2-0)NONEundefeated for the year on my 4 and 5 stars, and 19-3 on 3 stars and up... saddle up and ride fuckers, I got yo back[Edited on September 16, 2007 at 1:46 AM. Reason : d]
9/16/2007 1:43:55 AM
Well that was close.
9/16/2007 1:46:14 AM
Fuck FSU for scaring me like that after 3 and half quarters of domination
9/16/2007 1:48:19 AM
Bengals -7.5Saints -4Cowboys -3.5Bears -12Carolina -7Indy -7
9/16/2007 2:36:30 AM
I'm on all those other than the Bears right now, but you got some shitty linesAt most sights all those lines are at least half a point betterI got the Bengals -7, Saints -3, Cowboys -3, Panthers -6.5 and Indy -6.5It pays to look around for lines, especially on key numbers like 3 and 7
9/16/2007 2:38:34 AM
Well I can only put money onto one site very easily, SportsInteraction.com
9/16/2007 2:40:27 AM
OH OH! We got a special "after midnight" two game release to add to the slate of games for tomorrow... after careful research we now have another 4-star game (almost want to make this a 5-star but its 3am so I'm not going to) and I dont know why, but for some reason I like Oakland to cover and almost win against the Broncos. Like I said, no reason why so I will drop this one down to the 1-star level. My brain tells me Broncos but 10 seems like an awful lot of points...WEEK 3here are my "stone cold, lead pipe, take them out behind the woodshed" locks for Week 3. Not a whole lot that I REALLY like this week though.... Year-to-date record in parentheses. * (4-6)Missouri -20 W. Michigan (have to ride this money train until they let me down) -WUNC -3 vs Virginia - LOakland +10 vs. Denver** (4-3)Cincinnati -7 vs Miami (Ohio) - WTennessee +7 vs Indianapolis*** (11-3)USC -10 vs Nebraska - WFSU -4.5 vs Colorado - WBC vs. GT U48 - WIllinois vs. Syracuse O43 - WIowa State +17.5 vs. Iowa - WNew Orleans -3 vs Tampa Bay**** (6-0)Florida -8 vs Tennessee - WOklahoma vs Utah State U63.5 - WCincinnati -7 vs. ClevelandSt. Louis -3 vs. San Fransisco ***** (2-0)NONEundefeated for the year on my 4 and 5 stars, and 19-3 on 3 stars and up... saddle up and ride fuckers, I got yo back[Edited on September 16, 2007 at 2:53 AM. Reason : d]
9/16/2007 2:53:30 AM
You are doing well.I, however, choose to do a ridiculous 5 way moneyline parlay that only pays out like 3.5:1.Pittsburgh over BuffaloCincinnati over ClevelandCarolina over HoustonNew Orleans over Tampa BayDenver over OaklandI'm sure one of them will lose, but since I am a hopeless gambling addict I must bet.
9/16/2007 3:19:10 AM
9/16/2007 9:35:31 AM
^where did you find that stat? I bet on the Saints and the Pats too with a teaser but it is very concerning how much of the public is on the Saints
9/16/2007 10:24:03 AM
^ http://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/matchups/It says 97% are on the Saints side, lol.I wouldn't worry too much, public always pounds road favs; I think the Bucs are going to win though[Edited on September 16, 2007 at 10:32 AM. Reason : d]
9/16/2007 10:30:50 AM