10/12/2008 12:49:43 PM
10/12/2008 1:13:42 PM
10/12/2008 1:43:37 PM
I cant believe, with the shtty economy, two never ending "wars", and all the rest of the stuff happening, that this race is even close....hell, if not for the shitty economy McCain would be ahead....what does that tell you.....if a Dem cant win during times like this they will never win. Of course, factoring in that it Obama is black and he has a weird name is probably one reason why he isnt creaming McCain....polls have started to tighten....but it does not really mater nationally, it is state by state and Obama has a huge advantage that he has been building for 3 weeks, dont think McCain has enough time to reverse that...unless there is a terr0rist strike (about what it would take).
10/12/2008 1:56:39 PM
Lol a ad i saw today"Congressional liberals fought against regulation within the banking industry that has led us to the current economic crisis.....""My name is John McCain and I approve this message.."LOL maybe i entered the twilight zone but traditionally has it not typically been the GOP that fights regulation....Unless my theory that republicans really do not care much about smaller gov't is more prevalent than I though. Also, had not the GOP controlled congress over the last 6 of 8 years. With the current Dem controlled legislature not accomplishing much against George W's veto pen.
10/12/2008 2:44:39 PM
Are you retarded Roddy? Your analysis is just horrible.
10/12/2008 2:44:44 PM
rational, not horrible 'and more rational than the arguments you present to voting for hussein obama
10/12/2008 2:46:37 PM
"Non-anglo middle name" certainly is a rational argument.
10/12/2008 3:13:39 PM
desperation.
10/12/2008 3:25:29 PM
10/12/2008 3:56:03 PM
10/12/2008 5:49:41 PM
Roddy - it's not close. Not at all.Obama 343 McCain 184 Ties 11http://www.electoral-vote.com/So, folks, does anyone here think McCain stands a snowball's chance in hell?http://www.dirtygreek.org/journal/journalId/2158Now, that's a significant lead, but let's consider just the states that are marked "Strong Dem" or "Weak Dem." "Strong" means support of 10% or more, "weak" means 5% to 9%, and "barely" means less than 5%. Those include:WA-11OR-7CA-55NM-5MN-10IA-7WI-10IL-21MI-17 ME-4VT-3NH-4MA-12RI-4CT-7NJ-15DE-3 MD-10DC-3PA-21VA-13FL-27NY-31HI-4For a total of 304. So, even if all of the states that are tied or "Barely Dem" are won and McCain takes the rest, that's still a win for Obama by 70 votes (304 to 234). Everyone knows, however, that Florida is never a sure thing for the Democrats, so let's assume that it doesn't work out there. That then changes the final tally to 277 Obama, 261 McCain. That's close, but close only counts in horseshoes and thermonuclear war.
10/12/2008 6:44:55 PM
i for one am disappointed in the mccain/palin campaign! i thought palin was a great choice for VP (strong Christian foundation, history of reform, energy policy) but mccain is just too dang erratic.oh well, i'll still vote a straight republican ticket! republicans will bring it back in 2012, maybe palin will have learned how to deal with the liberal MSM by then.
10/12/2008 7:08:40 PM
10/12/2008 7:20:19 PM
10/12/2008 7:28:55 PM
10/12/2008 7:58:30 PM
10/12/2008 8:06:50 PM
So is Obama president yet?
10/12/2008 8:13:37 PM
wow noone has compared either candidate to Hitler yet. I guess the Hitler comparison is as big anymore
10/12/2008 8:14:23 PM
looks like Obama has peaked....is the decline going to be slow or will it just be fast enough where McCain wins (photo finish)? Already seeing polls tighten, looks like now Ohio is going McCain's way...all the states that are in play are GOP states, will they come around at the last minute and vote for McCain?I have noticed he went over 50% but now he is back down to 50%...i really expect it to be MUCH closer when all is said and done and I am beginning to think McCain will win this thing....[Edited on October 12, 2008 at 8:32 PM. Reason : w]
10/12/2008 8:26:22 PM
Maybe when she becomes VP; Palin can go huntin and dip some chewin tobaccer with the Chancellor of Germany.
10/12/2008 8:30:45 PM
^^ the last change-over from Obama being at a peak to McCain taking the lead happened in about 7 days, so 2 weeks is plenty of time.But that happened with the RNC, so McCain would need another huge boost. Considering it was the debates that boosted Obama, Obama just need to maintain a lot of camera time, and he should be able to maintain a lead.
10/12/2008 8:33:55 PM
LOL when did NC become a battleground state. This is a bad sign for teh GOP
10/12/2008 8:34:28 PM
10/12/2008 9:00:51 PM
wow, Roddy really is an idiot. Obama is solidifying, not dropping.
10/12/2008 9:34:31 PM
But don't you see? He just made marginal progress towards regaining an essential state that he took for granted a month ago.That's basically like winning. Basically.
10/12/2008 9:53:37 PM
10/12/2008 9:56:53 PM
Aha Lindsey Graham said this morning that if McCain / Helicopter Deer Hunter Xtreme lose in NC it's because the Dems cheated.EPICS LULZ
10/12/2008 10:02:59 PM
So McCain is the next Ronald Reagan?
10/12/2008 10:04:13 PM
Liberals would never say McCain's that bad.Conservatives would never say McCain's that good.[Edited on October 12, 2008 at 10:08 PM. Reason : lawlz]
10/12/2008 10:06:05 PM
I've said this before, but it should be reiterated. All Obama needs to win the presidency is the Kerry states + NM + CO + IA. As long as he continues to hold a significant lead in those states, the only thing that will change if the "polls tighten" is Obama's margin of victory. With that said, they aren't tightening. He's held a very steady lead for almost two weeks now, all we're seeing is statistical noise. Every day that passes the worse McCain's chances get.
10/12/2008 10:10:22 PM
^That's just what the lieberal media would want you to believe.
10/12/2008 10:14:58 PM
10/12/2008 11:10:38 PM
10/12/2008 11:30:21 PM
embarrassing......http://slapshot.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/a-misplaced-hockey-mom-moment/
10/13/2008 12:09:35 AM
10/13/2008 12:16:57 AM
10/13/2008 12:32:15 AM
10/13/2008 12:33:50 AM
I can no longer differentiate sarcasm from sincerity in the political discourse these days.[Edited on October 13, 2008 at 12:35 AM. Reason : ]
10/13/2008 12:34:39 AM
10/13/2008 8:01:44 AM
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/12/185143/14/911/628630
10/13/2008 8:31:06 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l63SRpGXBHELMAO.Listen to the Penguin's talking points.
10/13/2008 8:55:13 AM
10/13/2008 9:01:28 AM
WHY OH WHY Do people even talk about the national polls, much less use them as any kind of indicator? They mean nothing as far as the final results of the election go. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=5andhttp://www.electoral-vote.com tell you much more about the final outcome, and it looks BAD for McCain/Palin.Realclearpolitics shows that Obama already has 277 Electoral votes in the bag, and that McCain basically has to win EVERY tossup state and reverse 8 of the votes Obama already has in order to win.NOT GONNA HAPPEN
10/13/2008 9:40:13 AM
"we have them right where we want them"John McCain / Monday, Oct 13 during his 'reboot' stump speech *BREAKING*
10/13/2008 9:48:07 AM
^ he's probably joking. it seems like a lot of folks willfully ignore McCain's sense of humor and use it against him.For example, when McCain visited a German restaurant while Obama in Germany during his "world tour." All the Talking Heads and the Daily Show made it sound like he was an idiot for doing so, not realizing that McCain was making light of Obama's sudden interest in meeting world leaders (McCain does it for a living, Obama does it for political stunt). Of course, like I said, it was willful ignorance. They acted like they didn't see the humor in order to paint McCain as out of touch or just weird.
10/13/2008 9:58:32 AM
I see what you're saying but in this situation I'm not warping the context really.
10/13/2008 10:03:48 AM
^ hmmm I saw on WRAL this morning that he was going to be in Wilmington today and that one of his themes would be that Obama is over confident. I haven't read any other news this morning (except for Paul Krugman winning the Nobel!!!), but if that's the case maybe you're right.If he isn't kidding and this is the theme he wants to go out on (that Obama is too confident??) then I would say we might as well wrap this one up with a bow.
10/13/2008 10:20:30 AM
It didn't work for hillary, and it won't work for mccain.
10/13/2008 10:25:42 AM
I think McCain's best shot is to fire Steve Schmidt and Rick Davis and start talking about what he can do to help the middle class.....no pandering to the base, no Palin wreaking incendiary havoc with her remarks, no more talking about Obama's un-Americanness (whatever that is), and no more only talking about economics as it relates to investors and business.Most voters aren't investors and/or run businesses, talk about families.
10/13/2008 10:37:33 AM