yes let's praise her for making the world a safer placeBUILD THIS SAINT A STATUE
10/29/2005 5:26:50 PM
who is she receiving praise from, it seems like a low blow thing to do really
10/29/2005 5:40:19 PM
what SHE did? yeah, it is.
10/29/2005 5:43:23 PM
Your argument should not be that they weren't drinking, because anyone that wasn't born yesterday will correctly assume they were.The correct argument is that the evidence is from an unreliable source, vague, inconclusive and inadmissable.
10/29/2005 5:49:38 PM
if you were really an uptight dillwad and wanted to write someone up for underage drinking, walk around the hall a couple of random times on a weekend night and find a door open with underage people drinking inside. YOU WILL FIND ONE. It might take a few tries. But that is validly aginst the policy, to drink underage in the dorm and there is no question of procedure. Why can't you do that instead of this bullshit?
10/29/2005 6:14:30 PM
Just to update you guys about the media attention this is getting around the state. I just heard from my parent in Winston-Salem that this story made the 10pm news last night along with a story about Duke University. [Edited on October 29, 2005 at 9:39 PM. Reason : wrong information given out]
10/29/2005 9:34:21 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/5204275/detail.html
10/29/2005 9:54:54 PM
^, i've known several people who have gotten caught drinking in the dorms, all they do is make you take an alcohol class. They don't put you on probation. If you do something worse you may get probation but the first time it's only for like a year, then if you get in trouble again it's until you are done at the school. Getting in trouble for drinking in the dorm will not be on a transcript. So it's not going to close any doors. And if you've only gotten in trouble 1 time and were put on probation I don't think that will be on your transcript and you can appeal to have the record sealed.Anyhow these kids should all go in and deny it. Say they did not drink in the dorms, they were in the dorm together but not drinking. "I don't know how those beers got in the picture. We weren't drinking." and if at the end of the meeting if they told me I was being sanctioned, I'd say "well since you can't prove that I was drinkning and are sanctioning me anyway... you'll be hearing from my lawyer". And then I'd pursue to sue them for defamation of character, and libel the second it went down on paper. If they cleared my record i'd drop the lawsuit, if not i'd be more than happy to pursue.[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 10:50 PM. Reason : .]
10/29/2005 10:44:32 PM
This is rediculous. I hope somebody takes it for the team and get a lawyer to put these fuckers in their place.Or maybe we should start a boycott of University Housing. I'd love to see what would happen to them with a 15% vacancy rate.[Edited on October 30, 2005 at 12:48 AM. Reason : ?]
10/30/2005 12:47:55 AM
alright quit comparing an apple to an orange. they're both fruits but it doesn't mean they're the same. killing a person and drinking is not the same, so a picture providing evidence wouldn't be taken to same severity. seriously, if i was in charge i would have dismissed the case already because it's unreliable. one, the pictures were taken off from a website, i.e. not from her posession. two, they're digital, not hardcopy, so who knows if they were altered. if for some reason, there were actual photographs within the ra's possesion that she took of the person that was drinking, ok then maybe there is a case. i mean, i don't think putting a picture of yourself drinking on facebook is a very bright idea, but i don't agree that that person should be put to trial on an unjust cause. and they're innocent until proven guilty. just wanted to point that out to the person who said they were.
10/30/2005 2:21:34 AM
I really am interested in rather you can or cannot get legal action on this kind of thing. It does go on a university official record (which can be requested even tho it's not in on your transcript) and I would clearly think that fits defamation of character when it's something that clearly has no solid proof behind it.There just seems to be so little accountability for unbaised voilation writeups. The system really has no one to answer for, this isn't the first time i've heard about problems with student conduct (well, actually personal experience). if none of the accused have been to student legal services then it's worth a try at least. I'm sure they get cases that are worse wastes of their time.
10/30/2005 2:26:51 AM
Nerdchick:
10/30/2005 9:55:56 AM
10/30/2005 9:56:08 AM
10/30/2005 10:25:55 AM
^ why's that? This is pretty silly shit, digital photos probably wouldn't hold up in a court of law. Now this isn't a court of law and it doesn't work the same at all, but everyone knows this is bullshit. They're just gonna get a slap on the wrist, unless any of them have been in trouble before. Knowing that, I would probably just let it go if it were me. But if it meant getting in some kind of greater trouble, no way.
10/30/2005 10:34:02 AM
10/30/2005 10:49:30 AM
^ same reason people who have wireless networks have been getting RIAA lawsuits dropped. They can't prove that it wasn't someone else that downloaded the files on the wireless network. And in this case they can't prove that the photos weren't altered. granted we all know that's not what happened, but that possibility is still enough for it not to be conlusive in court. As for student conduct, they operate very differently than a court of law, but they need to exercise some sort of judgement in what they allow to happen over there.[Edited on October 30, 2005 at 10:57 AM. Reason : .]
10/30/2005 10:53:41 AM
10/30/2005 10:57:31 AM
10/30/2005 11:02:14 AM
I would like to get a raise of hands on who all honestly fucking thinks they photoshopped beer cans into their hands.STARTING NOW
10/30/2005 12:16:54 PM
someone should photoshop beer into a picture of the RA that busted themcharges dropped immediately
10/30/2005 12:20:48 PM
^ get a can shaped item with blue construction paper all over it and get a picture of the RA holding. With a skilled photoshop user and that picture, no problem making it realisitc.But i also notice a trend lately that no one has been seeing that RA around much. HIDE IN YOUR ROOM AS LONG AS YOU CAN!!1
10/30/2005 12:31:11 PM
Well, this certainly isn't surprising -- sometimes "authorities" want to make a show of how "connected" they are to the real underbelly of student social interaction, so they try to make examples like this."You can run little underage drinker, but you can't hide! I can browse your Facebook profile!"Whatever -- the privacy arguments are pretty dubious; the "conclusive evidence" one is a little better but not great. But the administration is incredibly stupid to make their methods known in this way. Surely it's a lot better for students to post pictures of themselves drinking underage on Facebook -- that can help to catch them in the act. But if the University makes it clear that they'll repremand based on the picture alone, then people will just stop posting them. And they'll keep drinking underage -- it's not like people drink just so they can post pictures of it on the Internet!
10/30/2005 12:57:10 PM
^Think about this from the University's perspective. A freshman comes to college, gets on facebook, and sees tons of people drinking on their profiles. Plus he knows there's nothing happening to those people. What is he going to think?
10/30/2005 1:40:03 PM
think about the RA's perspective when she goes to testify and sees a photochopped pic of herself drinking beer in the dorm.
10/30/2005 1:44:49 PM
hey, I'm an RA, I would never do that shit
10/30/2005 1:46:34 PM
10/30/2005 1:46:36 PM
Think about this from a "sane person's" perspective. Freshman comes to college, gets on the internet and sees "18 y/o college porn" with UNIVERSITY LOGOS on the wall. They might automatically assume college is only people fucking. Grow up and use your brain.
10/30/2005 1:46:49 PM
wait there people are from jordan? i dont recognize names
10/30/2005 1:49:15 PM
this isnt the court of law, this is ncsu judicial court. huge fucking difference, those people are nazis. you dont need proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
10/30/2005 1:56:26 PM
they sure as hell don'twhen I got in trouble they asked me to explain before they told me what the cop wrote down. I was like, what the fuck. What am I here to explain?
10/30/2005 2:00:36 PM
10/30/2005 2:55:51 PM
10/30/2005 5:01:12 PM
10/30/2005 5:17:34 PM
so photoshop a beer into the RA's hand.problem solved.
10/30/2005 5:22:14 PM
^prblem solved
10/30/2005 5:53:44 PM
10/30/2005 6:02:02 PM
I hear that this Amanda Bostian is quite the party animal herself.
10/30/2005 6:29:39 PM
that is awesome
10/30/2005 6:36:18 PM
lol we should forward that pic to student conduct anonymously [Edited on October 30, 2005 at 6:38 PM. Reason : .]
10/30/2005 6:37:56 PM
sweet idea...second notion passed...
10/30/2005 6:39:38 PM
nice work Adam!
10/30/2005 7:52:45 PM
ive already mailed it off
10/30/2005 7:57:04 PM
hahahaha @ picture.
10/30/2005 7:57:32 PM
She was in my grade Jon
10/30/2005 8:09:07 PM
that pic needs the block s logo on the hat
10/30/2005 8:14:07 PM
10/30/2005 8:32:08 PM
There will be a meeting this Wednesday at 8pm in 206 Witherspoon Student Center where a response on behalf of the Student Body will be drafted. We are looking for as many people as possible to come and tell their opinions and feelings regarding this.Any Alexander residents you can get out for that evening would be great. We are also planning to invite in members of the administration of University Housing to explain their case and why they feel enforcing policy in this manor is in any way appropriate. We will do all we can to see that those who have an impact in deciding if these violations are valid and levying sanctions know very clearly how the students at this University stand on this issue.In the long-term, it is being discussed how we can prevent something like this from happening again. Ideas are floating around as to how but what I’m looking at is encouraging University Housing to set a clear policy for their RA’s in future years as to what is and isn’t appropriate ways to cite students for violations. If housing will not do it on their own, taking the issue to the Board of Trustees is not beyond belief. Students can really have an impact in making this happen and helping to prevent future students from having to deal with this type of consequences from having a over zealous RA or housing admin. If you have any ideas, send them to me or talk to me after the meeting. My email is jmsevits@ncsu.eduOh, and the photoshop is great btw. Shame, shame, what a hypocrite.
10/30/2005 8:34:02 PM
^I'd like to go to that (would it be inappropriate to bring the NCSU nazi signs? (jk) btw, Good photoshop, maybe she'll try to sue TWW over it
10/30/2005 8:52:57 PM
how can she prove it was photochopped...
10/30/2005 8:55:59 PM