7/5/2016 8:28:17 PM
7/5/2016 8:33:25 PM
Your problem here is you are always sending me his tweets and read only his tweets in my presence, and you parroted his two points here hours after he tweeted them. The jig is up my friend.I know you say you're not going to vote for him, but I'm not so sure...[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 8:39 PM. Reason : There are plenty of OBVIOUS takeaways here but u just happened to chose the exact two with the exact same language as your FAVORITE Twitter follow?][Edited on July 5, 2016 at 8:43 PM. Reason : V See that's yet another takeaway. Another of which you didn't post! Nothing about being above the law. Nothing about their history breaking laws. etc]]
7/5/2016 8:36:35 PM
This shit is completely indefensible.
7/5/2016 8:42:05 PM
^ true.anyone who has1) ever had any government security clearance, or2) a brainagrees.I was having a conversation with my sons tonight about this and politics in general and they couldn't understand why people would vote for someone just because of their genderbut alas, people are idiots
7/5/2016 9:47:42 PM
It's absolutely incredible that your children would agree with your political positions. What are the odds???[Edited on July 5, 2016 at 10:55 PM. Reason : Also your premise is dumb. I'm sure you were making the same dumb argument about race in 2008][Edited on July 5, 2016 at 11:01 PM. Reason : At least you could talk your offspring into being upset about her shady shit, instead of her gender.]
7/5/2016 10:48:56 PM
God damn, another generation of dog whistles. Yay.
7/6/2016 8:25:28 AM
but alas, m'lady
7/6/2016 9:48:09 AM
7/6/2016 10:15:16 AM
Ok I will say one more thing then. And this is it, I promise.Regardless of whether she should or should not be held criminally liable for anything that she did regarding her email activity, no one can argue that she was negligent, full of poor decisions, and just plain stupid with her clearance level. That can not be disputed, those are facts with a few of my adjectives thrown in.Someone who is so careless with her clearance running for a position that is one of the most cleared in the world as far as national and international security? Seems like a no brainer.I say that, but then I remember my only real alternative is Trump, of whom one could say "Do we even want to give that type of clearance to a person like him?"Ugh.
7/6/2016 11:26:57 AM
yep, she'd totally set up another private server again if elected
7/6/2016 11:52:23 AM
Yeah I'm sure she wouldn't do anything shady at all, she is so trustworthy and all
7/6/2016 11:55:04 AM
most transparent politician in history http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/hillary-clinton-missing-emails-secretary-state-department-personal-server-investigation-fbi-214016
7/6/2016 2:07:26 PM
Nothing damning there.Email gaps of single days! When he started going on about time lapses in email traffic I thought he was going to say a week+ or something. But a single day? Come on.And no emails about Bill being in Columbia? That proves exactly jack shit.Then you get down to the money line:
7/6/2016 2:56:04 PM
7/6/2016 3:31:06 PM
lol .2%[Edited on July 6, 2016 at 3:36 PM. Reason : that entire post was .2%. introduction, body and closing. all .2%]]
7/6/2016 3:36:06 PM
^^ read that again and see if it doesn't sound dumb to you
7/6/2016 3:55:03 PM
^ it does not. Using the wrong email doesn't warrant criminal prosecution.
7/6/2016 5:00:24 PM
7/6/2016 5:10:38 PM
And? What does that have to do with a civilian cabinet position?
7/6/2016 5:14:52 PM
She signed the same classified materials training forms as I did
7/6/2016 5:16:20 PM
Which is probably why the FBI recommended administrative action. I'm sure you realize she couldn't be court martialed, or whatever an Article 15 is.As the Secretary of State, she wrote the rules for the entire department. If she really wanted to, she could have likely successfully lobbied to use her own server, but was probably thinking it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. It's shady, and negligent and irresponsible, but not remotely criminal. She doesnt seem to understand that sent/received emails typically exist on sending and receiving server, so having a private server doesn't gain her much secrecy anyway. It only guarantees that personal emails aren't automatically subject to government review, which is probably what she was going for.[Edited on July 6, 2016 at 5:22 PM. Reason : ]
7/6/2016 5:19:01 PM
You have zero idea how classification rules work.
7/6/2016 5:31:12 PM
7/6/2016 5:38:33 PM
7/6/2016 6:02:41 PM
Lack of precedence != precedence.
7/6/2016 6:30:19 PM
...and NJP != criminalI don't know what you did in the military, granted, but I'd be willing to bet mast wouldn't be your first stop for a spill unless it was deliberate, particularly egregious, or you were a shitbird and it was the final straw.
7/6/2016 6:56:30 PM
Handled explosives/certified with special weapons, so yes, my very first fuck up with those would be NJP or Court Martial.
7/6/2016 7:15:19 PM
http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/07/29/navy-engineer-sentenced-for-mishandling-classified-material/30862027/
7/6/2016 7:31:11 PM
7/6/2016 8:54:55 PM
Yeah, I meant Secret. But yeah, anything Secret or TS on NIPR and any TS on SIPR and not JWICS, you're fucked. [Edited on July 6, 2016 at 9:16 PM. Reason : a]
7/6/2016 9:02:36 PM
This was pretty clearly a direction not to prosecute. Every person I've seen or heard who has done anything with security clearance has been appalled by this. Everyone who isn't a Clinton partisan has said that legally what coney said is entirely contradictory. She lied under oath to Congress, she deleted 30000+ emails, and she didn't follow protocol to protect classified info. The only reason she isn't facing charges is because she's Hillary Clinton. It's pretty disgraceful really, but not all that surprising.
7/6/2016 9:54:35 PM
bbehe plz. you can't come in here swinging your big dick of insider knowledge complete with a plethora of acronyms, and saying other people "have zero idea how classification rules work," and then fuck up a hypothetical utilizing insider knowledge of said classification rules.i'm with you in spirit, but you gotta come correct.]
7/6/2016 9:57:00 PM
^ Lulz, I know man, I'm disappointed in myself I was going somewhere else with the initial post but deleted half of it and started again. Oh well, I'm voting for Batman this election.
7/6/2016 9:58:35 PM
7/6/2016 10:28:07 PM
It's bigger than Comey mane]
7/6/2016 10:30:51 PM
7/6/2016 10:41:48 PM
7/6/2016 10:47:32 PM
dude his entire message was "look at all that's here...I'm just not gonna recommend indictment."
7/6/2016 11:02:01 PM
Or it was:
7/6/2016 11:05:22 PM
How is that naval case any different than this one?
7/6/2016 11:11:51 PM
7/6/2016 11:19:28 PM
Yeah, it's utterly incomprehensible. He laid out a perfect case for why she should be prosecuted and then basically said, well, we don't think a reasonable prosecutor could successfully pursue this case, therefore no charges. The people I know who have had any level of clearance are all completely amazed that this resulted in nothing when they would have lost their clearance, been shitcanned and likely charged for this same behavior. It's baffling.I'm sure it wasn't outright said, but this smells very much like, "if you would like to continue on as director of the FBI or maybe even as something higher up the food chain, you will recommend not bringing charges." Having the AG meeting with Bill a week before is also clearly something that should not have happened if you have even a shred of interest in appearing to be unbiased.
7/6/2016 11:33:40 PM
7/7/2016 12:53:41 AM
ITT a lot of people without TS/SCI talking about what to do with TS/SCI material, ITTAt the very least she should have her clearance permanently revoked.
7/7/2016 1:09:03 AM
She doesn't need a security clearance to be President.
7/7/2016 1:15:16 AM
^^^ Clinton did instruct her staff to remove classification headers so they could use a non-secure fax.^No, but she does receive intel briefs as a candidate of a major party.
7/7/2016 7:40:42 AM
Except simply removing a header wasn't the extent of her instructions
7/7/2016 7:59:51 AM
Paul Ryan asking DNI to remove Clinton's security clearance
7/7/2016 9:39:49 AM
I cant figure out why I walk around everyday realizing how stupid people are these days but then I realize we have voted for a habitual liar who clearly has no business being in the conversation to be president and a crazy racist, sexist asshole who also has no business being in that conversation and those are our two options for president.... Somehow we have managed to make both GW and Obama look like amazing presidential candidates despite all of the evidence that may say otherwise. Seriously how did we end up here?
7/7/2016 9:50:09 AM