Any of those three things would result in prison.

And frankly I'd probably feel better about Kaine taking over and him being more willing to work with the Sanders/Warren types.

But to be quite honest, there is literally nothing that could come out that would make me vote for Trump over anyone.

*** saw your edit and I do agree but a bit of selfishness and perspective from me. I have an eight month old son and I don't want to take a chance with his future on something as tenuous as that.

[Edited on October 25, 2016 at 4:31 PM. Reason : I suppose personal perspective like that it a big driver why I even care this cycle like I do]

10/25/2016 4:30:22 PM

I'd never suggest anyone vote for Trump.

10/25/2016 4:33:05 PM

message_topic.aspx?topic=612528&page=1

10/25/2016 4:39:43 PM

Speculation is not your strong suit, I'm fully aware of that.

10/25/2016 4:43:55 PM

Quote :

"I just like seeing corruption exposed, and I'm enjoying following this story."

You're trying to connect a ton of dots which point to a concrete, smoking gun, but unfortunately they don't. You'd need to find the smoking gun first, and until it exists in plain sight, you're just being strung along by a bunch of nebulous claims. Have at it if you want, but I think you're going to be pretty disappointed later.

10/25/2016 4:51:06 PM

give the guy a blackboard and some chalk and he'll get to the bottom of this

10/25/2016 4:53:35 PM

^^
We'll see. Like I said, I enjoy following the story.

[Edited on October 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM. Reason : I do think the McAuliffe story is pretty obvious bribery, though /shrug ]

10/25/2016 4:55:35 PM

McAuliffe could have fucked Comey's wife and he wouldn't have indicted Hillary.

10/25/2016 5:16:05 PM

Vote for George Soros, I hear he really wants what is best for your children.

10/26/2016 2:40:06 PM

Quote :

"what is the serious response to?"

Quote :

"think back to what you were told was in the intelligence briefing that was used to justify war, why are you assuming that what was reported about the briefing was accurate and that the briefing itself is accurate"

literally the post above my 2003 comment was what it was in response to. your post. where you used the intelligence failings of 2003 as an excuse to ignore all intelligence briefings as nothing more than propaganda.

jfc man keep track of your own bullshit next time.

[Edited on October 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM. Reason : /]

10/26/2016 3:11:07 PM

lol they are literally releasing one liners or a single email/response with zero context. how sad.

10/27/2016 2:09:14 PM

That's not true. They are hyping things with zero context on twitter but the full context is available if you search (unless something changed recently).

10/27/2016 2:12:18 PM

and it's being covered more and more as the leaks get more interesting/hashed out. they're linking to full stories.

10/27/2016 2:17:59 PM

is exactly the same as,

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/25842

Am I supposed to believe that was the entire conversation? In any case, it's an open secret Hillary regularly drinks grown ass men under the table.

10/27/2016 2:20:43 PM

Idk what you're getting at. Are you saying the email is doctored?

10/27/2016 2:43:13 PM

It could be, considering the source, but that's not what I'm getting at. That is obviously a small part of what was a much longer conversation. It's like mad libs, just use your imagination and fill in the blanks.

[Edited on October 27, 2016 at 2:54 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2016 2:53:02 PM

In 10 years they've never released falsified documents.

They're releasing the emails in chunks. There could be more future replies, but they don't delete previous replies.

[Edited on October 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM. Reason : .]

10/27/2016 2:55:14 PM

Oh, that is why Drudge had the picture of Clinton drinking up.

10/27/2016 3:17:27 PM

Rigging primary dates to increase the odds of an "extreme" Republican being nominated (while also protecting Hillary against Dem challengers). In 2014.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43823

11/3/2016 11:19:21 AM

I'm sorry but that is ridiculous. They worked with the DNC to try and get primary dates changed. This happens all the time surely. They even said in the email that it probably won't work like they hope in 2016.

Some of the stuff has been disturbing but a lot of it is just run of the mill boring politics being pumped up as high corruption.

11/3/2016 11:50:10 AM

You're kidding? It's all right in the email. They wanted an extreme candidate. They helped nominate Trump.

Typical or not (we don't know that), it's despicable.

11/3/2016 11:53:50 AM

^They got the extreme candidate that they wanted, and now the election is in possible jeopardy.

After reading that, I almost hope Trump wins.

11/3/2016 11:57:36 AM

You're blaming a democrat campaign for choosing Trump. It's parody level ridiculous.

Why would they not strategize on this type of thing? What campaign wouldn't?

^ or you know, you could blame dumbass GOP primary voters

[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 11:59 AM. Reason : ]

11/3/2016 11:58:59 AM

I'm not blaming them entirely, but it's clear they did all they could. How is it ridiculous? It's right there in plain text.

11/3/2016 12:00:17 PM

Wow, so Hillary not only rigged the Democratic primary in her favor, she also rigged the Republican primary in Trumps favor? Explain to me again why we don't want this extremely powerful and influential person as our President? As Bill Clinton said, "My girl's got more juice than I ever dreamed.".

11/3/2016 12:00:19 PM

hack

11/3/2016 12:02:03 PM

He is a hack. Worse than anyone on here on the left.

But you buy EVERY story hook, line and sinker. Ive said over and over again that Clinton is a weak candidate and is absolutely at best corrupted like everyone in DC and at worst, one of the worst offenders we've seen at this level. But you consistently make her and her campaign into this unprecedented mastermind and buy every GOP smear because it fits that narrative.

I freely admit I'm as never-Trump as they come but I do try and at least disseminate what does and doesn't make sense about his stories and have called them out on many occasions.

11/3/2016 12:05:11 PM

^^Awwww, I'm sowwy, did I hurt your wittle feeling by pointing out how much of a ridiculous conspiracy theorist you are? Explain to me, if Hillary Clinton had the kind of pull you people imagine, why didn't she win in 2008?

[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 12:06 PM. Reason : .]

11/3/2016 12:05:31 PM

Quote :

"They got the extreme candidate that they wanted, and now the election is in possible jeopardy. After reading that, I almost hope Trump wins."

11/3/2016 12:07:50 PM

^^^
It's not a GOP smear. It's an email her campaign organizer sent.

[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 12:08 PM. Reason : .]

11/3/2016 12:07:51 PM

I'm not talking about that specifically and I think you knew that.

11/3/2016 12:08:34 PM

What GOP smear have I bought into? Other than Bill being a sex offender?

11/3/2016 12:09:43 PM

Most obvious is the origin of the hacking.

11/3/2016 12:14:28 PM

Assange said today it isn't Russia. He's never in 10 years lied about a source.

11/3/2016 12:16:56 PM

Wonder where he said that on?

** I'll say it again. I don't think I fundamentally disagree with you on Clinton or exposing corruption. I do think you are way overzealous and try and make big things out of things that may not always be big. And unlike other people on here I do find it more worthwhile to have these conversations about this with you

[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 12:20 PM. Reason : ]

11/3/2016 12:18:02 PM

It wasnt for RT

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794180237693255682

I don't disagree that I get excited sometimes, but I'm always willing to change my view with evidence, unlike some others here. But likewise, I always appreciate the conversation.


[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 12:26 PM. Reason : .]

11/3/2016 12:23:09 PM

lying liar lies - tweet at 11

11/3/2016 1:07:26 PM

That email was written in 2014 when "extreme" meant some tea party dipshit, not reality show rapist

11/3/2016 1:26:15 PM

This one from April 2015 specifically names Cruz, Trump, and Carson.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails//fileid/1120/251

Also Cruz is scarier than Trump

11/3/2016 1:42:50 PM

Welp

11/3/2016 1:51:42 PM

Quote :

"Wow, so Hillary not only rigged the Democratic primary in her favor, she also rigged the Republican primary in Trumps favor? Explain to me again why we don't want this extremely powerful and influential person as our President? As Bill Clinton said, "My girl's got more juice than I ever dreamed.". "

It's not just Clinton, it's the entire DNC, their donors, and their media.

The liberal media is the primary reason Trump was taken seriously.

11/3/2016 2:10:49 PM

Quote :

"Wow, so Hillary not only rigged the Democratic primary in her favor, she also rigged the Republican primary in Trumps favor? Explain to me again why we don't want this extremely powerful and influential person as our President? As Bill Clinton said, "My girl's got more juice than I ever dreamed.". "

It's not just Clinton, it's the entire DNC, their donors, and their media.

The liberal media is the primary reason Trump was taken seriously. (Including all of the leftists on this site bumping threads with tabloid "Trump just said _____???!!!" articles.

11/3/2016 2:15:03 PM

Quote :

"The liberal media is the primary reason Trump was taken seriously."

[Edited on November 3, 2016 at 2:29 PM. Reason : learn to edit posts you dumbfuck]

11/3/2016 2:28:51 PM

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794247777756860417

Linking to R/TheDonald now..

11/3/2016 3:58:23 PM

if it adds up...the source doesn't matter

11/3/2016 11:03:22 PM

Yes, it does. He is shitting on his legacy and legitimacy doing this type of thing. I realize I've had this conversation with you before and you don't see it that way but he has done this over and over and with false stories this year (most notably the Seth Rich stuff but also other GatewayPundit nonsense as well such as the earpiece).

I will not question the authenticity of documents he releases. He does have a sterling record in that manner. But this other stuff needs to stop.

(I don't blame from a business perspective by the way. WikiLeaks is as hot as it as ever been and he has a legion of new frothing at the mouth fans. Just read that story on Macedonia and Facebook -- same type of thing. Good on him for capitalizing on it.)

[Edited on November 4, 2016 at 6:31 AM. Reason : X]

11/4/2016 6:28:57 AM

I'd really recommend listening to the Pilger Assange interview. I think you have a warped perspective of Wikileaks, which I can understand given the media coverage of them.

[Edited on November 4, 2016 at 11:09 AM. Reason : The older one, new one comes out tomorrow]

11/4/2016 11:00:58 AM

That's fair. I have some busy work I need to finish this afternoon so I'll take a listen. Where can I get it?

11/4/2016 11:10:36 AM

https://youtu.be/VsYv0WfBJU0

Skip to 8 min if you get bored listening to them talk about govt censorship.

[Edited on November 4, 2016 at 11:17 AM. Reason : .]

11/4/2016 11:13:25 AM

Quote :

"10 minutes ago Glenn Greenwald said in a response he had no doubt WikiLeaks would publish anti-Trump stuff if it had any -- he then deleted"

ha

11/4/2016 12:10:53 PM