Oh, well that's good enough for me.
6/26/2013 8:48:09 PM
Dude just used Wikipedia as a source...
6/26/2013 11:51:48 PM
I should mention here that the drugs that transgender children may take to delay puberty are not permanent; shortly after they're stopped, puberty will progress normally.It's highly unlikely that by the time the puberty-blockers are taken, she would have any doubt about her gender identity; in fact, people usually know before they enter school, and the only reason for taking puberty-blockers is to make medical and surgical transition, which almost always starts at age 18 and never long before it, more seamless by preventing the irreversible effects of the sex hormones that are associated with the wrong gender identity (that is, the results would be worse if the trans teen were made to go through puberty before HRT and GCS, and puberty usually ends a year or so before the age of majority).
6/27/2013 6:21:47 AM
6/27/2013 11:13:32 AM
6/27/2013 11:34:46 AM
Quick reminder:Smath is an educator.
6/27/2013 2:30:14 PM
Using hormones to purposefully cause a child's genitals to not grow correctly is horrific. You are advocating for disfiguring a child because of a mental condition that is not well understood or defined, and sometimes reverses its self during adolescence on it's own? You are quite a piece of shit.
6/27/2013 2:40:48 PM
lots of hyperbole flying around on both sidessmath, i agree that you shouldn't automatically put a kid on hormone treatment when they think they might want to live as a girl. that's why no one does that, ever. they have to remain that way for years before a psychiatrist will give them the go ahead.
6/27/2013 2:56:29 PM
hyperbole in the soap box????
6/27/2013 3:01:12 PM
Another set of parents that should be shothttp://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/07/12/Transgender-At-Age-6-Family-Embraces-Decision-To-Let-Daughter-Live-As-Boy
7/13/2013 11:29:13 AM
i was meh about that whole article until
7/13/2013 12:02:00 PM
For pete fucking sakeThe kid is 6 years old. 6 year olds don't know the implications of their decisions and how it will affect their future lives.I'm about to give up on our species.
7/13/2013 3:51:09 PM
They do know their own gender identity, however; it's not a "decision"Here's a more reliable source for the story: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/transgender-at-6-for-tyler-and-his-parents-no-second-thoughts/2013/07/11/eab8b398-ea0f-11e2-a301-ea5a8116d211_story.html
7/13/2013 3:56:44 PM
A child that age doesn't even fully understand the differences between males and females.
7/13/2013 4:01:35 PM
Gender identity is not dependent on some conscious, intellectual understanding of the difference between males and females but is largely inborn: http://lgbt.ucsf.edu/pdfs/O'Hanlan%20Plenary.pdf[Edited on July 13, 2013 at 5:15 PM. Reason : Quick reminder, Smath74 is an educator.
7/13/2013 5:14:16 PM
yes, we have covered this. i have also explained that it is unethical to alter a child's hormones so he or she doesn't develop properly.
7/13/2013 5:38:03 PM
and you are wrong in the case of transgender children
7/13/2013 8:11:21 PM
that's your opinion, which I think is wrong. it's not like a kid who has diabetes and you give them insulin. that is clear cut, and the medical community would agree on the treatment.This is something that is far from being well understood, and among medical professionals it is far from agreed upon that children should be given hormones to prevent the natural development of their bodies.
7/13/2013 9:04:10 PM
^why do you keep bringing up hormones? children are not given hormones, and they aren't given puberty blockers until the first signs of puberty (10-12). if he still wants to be a boy after 4-6 years, don't you think that's enough time?http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/transgender-kids-get-puberty-blocking-drugs-sex-changing-hormones/article547465/[Edited on July 13, 2013 at 9:28 PM. Reason : .]
7/13/2013 9:27:03 PM
7/13/2013 11:01:42 PM
How is it that if I spank my kids, some people think that is abuse, yet this is completely ok?
7/13/2013 11:16:42 PM
^^
7/13/2013 11:20:54 PM
7/13/2013 11:28:37 PM
puberty blockers aren't hormones, and lewisje already told you that they're reversible[Edited on July 13, 2013 at 11:32 PM. Reason : .]
7/13/2013 11:32:10 PM
My post:
7/13/2013 11:36:52 PM
[Edited on July 13, 2013 at 11:47 PM. Reason : fuck it]
7/13/2013 11:46:02 PM
7/14/2013 4:33:30 AM
you say that like it is well agreed upon. it is NOT. it is a very controversial topic within the medical community... in fact most mainstream doctors don''t support it. this is a link to the first google search i found on the subject, but it tends to back up all of my points...1. doctors do NOT agree that these drugs are appropriate for a variety of reasons.2. one of the reasons is that it is not well understood and the effects of the drugs DO cause lifelong changes3. and there is not a reliable way to diagnose these disorders and many people first "diagnosed" with gender identity disorder turn out NOT to have it.
7/14/2013 7:07:35 AM
Even though I didn't say it directly earlier, I'll admit that I thought it was well agreed upon; my best guess is that there just isn't enough research to show that drugs prescribed to block precocious puberty are also effective in transgender cases to the satisfaction of the FDA, and that's because generally there is massive opposition from Rethug-oriented groups against research about human sexuality, because it offends their religious beliefs.Anyway, I'll post the link you referred to: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jun/15/local/la-me-transgender-kids-20120615and right before the "doctors remain divided" section:
7/14/2013 9:04:35 AM
7/14/2013 12:22:09 PM
7/15/2013 7:04:32 AM
jesus dude.
7/15/2013 2:24:28 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2416674/Leo-Waddell-transgender-boy-12-vows-fight-doctors-decision-ban-having-hormone-jabs.html
9/10/2013 11:39:22 PM
I guess that's the downside of socialized medicine (I mean real socialized medicine, not Obamacare): When your assigned doctor makes a bad call, it's hard to circumvent it.
9/13/2013 12:41:00 AM
http://www.wral.com/charlotte-leaders-lgbt-groups-tell-lawmakers-to-leave-transgender-ordinance-alone/15558793/
3/17/2016 10:35:45 PM
sexual predators are sexual predators who aren't protected by any lawit's really that simple
3/17/2016 10:42:49 PM
Wasn't the guy that sponsored that Charlotte nonsense a convicted sex offender?
3/18/2016 1:41:42 AM
I don't really care either way, I doubt there will be competition for the urinal so worst case I'll have to wait if I need a stall, but I can see how having a man in a women's bathroom or locker room can make a woman uncomfortable.
3/20/2016 7:04:22 PM
i get why people are against this, but they aren't thinking it through. Without this law, you'd have people with beards who otherwise look just like any man forced to use a woman's bathroom because they were born female, or you'd have a person you'd never know wasn't a woman having to walk into a men's bathroom. The ordinance just makes legal what transgender people are doing anyway. You could be seeing a person born a woman in the bathroom at your job or other businesses at not even know it right now.It doesn't allow any random dude from walking into the woman's bathroom and facing no repurcussions.
3/21/2016 12:26:38 AM
I have always wondered...Is there solidarity within the LBGT community? For example do most/all gays and lesbians support the agenda of the transgender community. I don't think anyone gives a shit about a dude wearing a dress but i wonder what the support of your average homosexual is regarding trans issues like "trans-women" (aka a dude in a dress) going to the womens room, chopping off dicks, and/or all the parents claiming their 6yr old daughter is really a boy.
3/21/2016 11:31:49 AM
I personally don't understand why they are all grouped under LGBT. I guess because if they were just "T" there wouldn't be enough to actually form a group. At least not one with any influence. I'm sure some gay people dislike having the negativity that comes along with the "T."
3/21/2016 12:31:54 PM
This is what I'm intrigued about!For the most part it seems that beyond the Kim Davis born-again Christian types and those that are insecure in their own sexuality, people are at least tolerant of same-sex couples generally being present in open society (though friction rises with marriage and adoption potentially). The "T" aspect of the group seems to be intent on breaking what are considered generally acceptable societal norms and involves psyches that some could argue if symptomatic of real emotional/mental disorders rather then being a characteristic of an individuals personality. Wearing a dress as a guy is one thing. Though the discussion of 7 yr boys, that are allegedly internally girls, using the womens room and chopping off genitals the make oneself a female is a whole lot different than 2 dudes making out in the park.While i could understand how they see themselves as all in the same boat, defying historical societal norms, it seems that the LBG part of the group risks en-flaming a large portion of society and creating a lot of friction against achieving many of their general goals by advocating for the T part. [Edited on March 21, 2016 at 1:28 PM. Reason : a]
3/21/2016 1:25:35 PM
a portion of LGBTs don't support bisexuals either. of course you aren't going to have complete solidarity in a group that makes up ~10% of the world.gay people were and still are considered to be breaking societal norms. are y'all for real right now?[Edited on March 21, 2016 at 1:31 PM. Reason : .]
3/21/2016 1:30:02 PM
3/21/2016 2:05:27 PM
If I go into a women's bathroom now, what will happen?Unless I'm acting like an asshole will anything really happen?
3/24/2016 11:33:54 PM
How are you going to use the bathroom? They don't have urinals in the ladies room.
3/25/2016 8:57:55 AM
[Edited on March 25, 2016 at 9:49 AM. Reason : ^ surely you can't be *that* stupid]
3/25/2016 9:49:22 AM
3/25/2016 10:44:29 AM
I was being somewhat facetious, but I don't consider it a stupid question. Plenty of people have plenty of questions about how this brave new world we live in will operate - most of us on here did not grow up where these norms were accepted, hell the Crying Game didn't even come out until 1992.
3/25/2016 10:51:59 AM
people with penises can still pee in toilets...? they can even sit down to pee if they want.
3/25/2016 1:38:27 PM