everyone does it guys, it's ok
7/31/2013 5:30:13 PM
Yes, it was an excellent troll move, albeit unbecoming of the office of Governor. Meanwhile the WRAL comments are left wondering why the protestors didnt take the "kind gesture" and "gift"
7/31/2013 6:13:16 PM
^^not at all what I said, but ok.
8/1/2013 9:55:49 AM
His twitter feed is straight up trollin' me today:@PatMcCroryNC: Our people deserve better and I know you will join me in making sure education is the leading factor in North Carolina’s economic comeback.@PatMcCroryNC: It’s about unleashing teachers & focusing on outcomes that will produce highly qualified workers for well-paying jobs.@PatMcCroryNC: Education is more than testing, pay scales & rankings.There are like a dozen more.
8/1/2013 10:59:21 AM
McCrory (or more likely, his handlers) are completely tone-deaf to the surrounding situation they've stirred up. He's gone after this first term.
8/1/2013 11:01:41 AM
That's what we need. Teachers.....UNLEASHED! I don't know how he's selling this shit, but bravo!
8/1/2013 11:33:22 AM
^^^is that really his twitter?
8/1/2013 11:35:44 AM
It's verified.
8/1/2013 11:37:28 AM
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/08/01/mccrory-claims-nc-education-budget-largest-in-history/He certainly has good timing. Giving a speech AFTER he has already signed these things to law.McCrory the troll.
8/1/2013 5:02:22 PM
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/08/mccrory-continues-to-drop.html
8/14/2013 1:03:52 PM
And of course as I said in the GOP credibility thread he doesn't even understand the Voter bill he signed.
8/14/2013 1:20:33 PM
BREAKING NEWS: GOV. PAT MCCRORY HAS VETOED LEGISLATION THAT WOULD HAVE REQUIRED PEOPLE APPLYING FOR WELFARE BENEFITS TO PASS A DRUG TEST. IT MARKS HIS FIRST VETO AS GOVERNOR.+1
8/15/2013 12:09:23 PM
http://www.wral.com/mccrory-issues-first-veto-rejecting-welfare-drug-testing/12779555/
8/15/2013 12:23:38 PM
^Wow, I just scanned through the comments on that story, and the GOLOers are NOT happy about this. Not at all.[Edited on August 15, 2013 at 1:26 PM. Reason : ]
8/15/2013 1:26:16 PM
8/15/2013 1:32:18 PM
Does this mean he trusts the PPP poll more than his internal poll?
8/15/2013 3:13:36 PM
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news%2Flocal&id=9207709
8/16/2013 9:48:49 AM
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/rachel-maddow/52769481/#52769481bigtime now, we made rachel maddow
8/16/2013 9:56:45 AM
I believe you saw that posted somewhere else.
8/16/2013 10:05:58 AM
^^^more on the large raises McCrory gave his staffers:http://www.wral.com/young-mccrory-staffers-get-big-government-salaries/12781585/
8/16/2013 10:11:39 AM
52k for an exec asst to the governor really doesn't seem that bad. If you don't make that and you're whining about it, change careers and get a better job.The other salaries are a bit much though.I have to question though, did anybody do this type of scrutiny with Bev Perdue and her staff rewards?
8/16/2013 11:03:55 AM
It's not even just the salaries that's concerning. A lot of these bureaucrats seem to have very little experience for the positions they hold.
8/16/2013 11:21:14 AM
It's just the GOP trying to rope in younger voters. By giving them directorial positions.
8/16/2013 11:26:11 AM
I do not think its the amount of the salaries that is the issue, it is that he gives his inner circle raises while cutting teacher pay, tenure, and benefits.
8/16/2013 11:27:02 AM
Why does the governors wife need an assistant? That seems like a lot of money and I don't really know what she would do[Edited on August 16, 2013 at 12:02 PM. Reason : ^ and I agree with that]
8/16/2013 12:02:11 PM
8/16/2013 12:45:26 PM
8/16/2013 12:46:39 PM
Has anyone in the GOP leadership commented on staffer pay, yet?Found it:
8/17/2013 8:58:28 AM
All the people mentioned in the article have well-manicured linkedin accounts. If I were a bit more bitter, I'd endorse them for cronyism.
8/17/2013 9:38:22 AM
LOL he didn't even fully read or understand the bill he signed, but he is fully behind it: http://www.icontact-archive.com/9-_swTffyq8WxRDCoLj0ArIbFV6ZX_CB?w=4
8/19/2013 3:05:53 PM
I thought secretaries were one of those little peon jobs that liberals wanted to be paid more?
8/19/2013 4:10:23 PM
who says that? that secretaries should make $52k (or $70k)? which "liberals"? [Edited on August 19, 2013 at 4:18 PM. Reason : ]
8/19/2013 4:18:11 PM
The ones that put question marks inside quotations.No seriously,I dont know anyone specific? The ones that want fast food workers paid $21/hr?You're only spotlighting these noobs because they work for McCrory. Were there people in similar capacities paid the same under Perdue? Would it have mattered if there were?
8/19/2013 4:22:34 PM
I'm spotlighting them because some of them got huge raises, are getting very large salaries, and many don't seem to have much experience at all in the managerial positions they now hold.Yes, if I found out the same think happened for Purdue, and I read an article where her husband had an "executive assistant" that was making $70k, I'd probably link it in the "Purdue Credibility Watch".(and i will always put my punctuation outside of quotations)[Edited on August 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM. Reason : ]
8/19/2013 4:39:00 PM
Fair enough.In that case, "just sayin."/shrug
8/19/2013 4:39:51 PM
(I take that back. After thinking about it some more, if i'm quoting a full sentence, I'll put the punctuation inside the quotations. But if I'm just quoting a phrase, like in both posts above, i put the punctuation outside the quotes, because it's not linked to the phrase.)[Edited on August 19, 2013 at 5:04 PM. Reason : ]
8/19/2013 4:43:42 PM
god dammit, where is froshkiller when you need him
8/19/2013 4:59:30 PM
those salaries for those positions is not really the issue (salaries seem fine to me). the issue is that we suspect that those people don't have much experience since they were hired from things unrelated to HHS and are very young (which we assume means limited experience, particularly in the HHS field); basically, good old fashion political cronyism. (although I don't understand why the first lady needs an executive assistant)
8/19/2013 5:45:56 PM
kind of like that brown guy was the head of FEMA that time, same principal
8/19/2013 10:14:26 PM
Well certainly these kids shouldnt be given any responsibilities similar to that in the event of another Hurricane Floyd.I would be very upset!
8/20/2013 11:20:43 AM
People can be exposed to undue suffering when government positions are filled with unqualified people just to reward their campaign contributions.
8/20/2013 11:21:22 AM
http://www.wral.com/mccrory-signs-landfill-bill-balks-at-leaky-trash-trucks/12810701/
8/23/2013 1:11:28 PM
8/23/2013 1:20:52 PM
He actually out-loud used the phrase 'job creators'. Credibility lost. Lock the thread.
8/23/2013 1:28:46 PM
Allowing landfills at the edges of state parks, wildlife refuges and gameparks, and at the same time easing regulations on landfills will most certainly lead to job creation! He's keeping his promise![Edited on August 23, 2013 at 1:31 PM. Reason : ]
8/23/2013 1:29:00 PM
at the edge of really means 1 or 3 miles
8/23/2013 1:36:18 PM
you forgot leaking garbage trucks. because that creates jobs like none other.
8/23/2013 1:37:10 PM
If this was a democratic administration, the headline about H74 would be "State requires landfills to investigate waste gas-to-energy option!"In regards to landfills:5 miles from wildlife refuge1 mile from game land500 feet from state gameland IF a.The waste disposal unit will only be permitted to accept construction and demolition debris waste, b. The disposal unit is located within the primary corporate limits of a municipality located in a county with a population of less than 15,000, c. All portions of the gameland within one mile of the disposal unit are separated from the disposal unit by a primary highway designated by the Federal Highway Administration as a U.S. Highway2 miles from state parkso basically, the only change is that if you can be closer to game land if its only construction debris and its seperated by a highwayIn regards to leachate- it look slike now they only have to camera inspect leachate lines every 5 years, everything else looks the same. this is the only part that I'm upset about. the standard used to be every year, but you could extend if to 2 years if you had continuous flow monitoring. Extending it to 5 years may be fine, but they should have included the continuous flow monitoring requirement.
8/23/2013 1:45:25 PM
He also signed the bill today that delays the Jordan rules yet again.
8/23/2013 2:29:41 PM
leaking garbage trucks can be cited which means the damage is already done when they are caught. As for the term "job creator" that is just ridiculous.
8/23/2013 2:43:12 PM