Quote :

"Translation: "Don't worry about. You were right and I don't want to look wrong.""

I posted a link. You avoided discussion and then declared yourself winner.

Why do you even bother posting on a discussion board? You're useless.

10/1/2012 10:45:28 PM

Quote :

"Seriously dude, google search yourself. You do this all over the Internet. "

You mean I'm the same person all over the net?

10/2/2012 12:43:13 AM

You are at least most of the people with your username. They post about the exact same topics in the same style, and in the daing websites were you acted unstable in message boards they listed your same town.

GeniusXboy is Josh Lazernick, please just talk to someone Josh.

10/2/2012 6:49:08 AM

You're creepy dude. I know a lot of people's real names, facebook accounts, personal lives on TWW but I don't broadcast that shit. Learn some respect.

10/2/2012 10:04:16 AM

http://therapists.psychologytoday.com/rms/prof_results.php?city=Virginia+Beach&county=Virginia+Beach+City&state=VA&spec=202

10/2/2012 10:06:24 AM

To be fair, once you walk into a therapist's office and say "People on the internet told me to come here." you're going to get told to sit down, no matter how crazy you are already.

10/2/2012 4:39:05 PM

So I haven't been here in a long time... is this salisburyboy?

10/4/2012 11:04:39 AM

Note: Do not answer any questions by msb2ncsu. He doesn't do simple research before posting stupid questions.

10/4/2012 1:48:29 PM

TN not calling their DMV a DMV == ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!

10/4/2012 2:17:59 PM

You're retarded.

10/4/2012 5:03:55 PM

i don't get the salisburyboy thing

Edit: nevermind i get it. searching from the linked username only showed 2 threads but google explained it.

[Edited on October 4, 2012 at 5:50 PM. Reason : .]

10/4/2012 5:46:01 PM

Another user that that the troll patrol used to harass.

10/4/2012 5:49:19 PM

Quote :

" Kucinich: US 'Immeasurably' Closer to War in Syria Democratic congressman: Obama deployed troops 'without notifying Congress'"

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/10/10/kucinich-us-immeasurably-closer-to-war-in-syria-kucinich-us-immeasurably-closer-to-war-in-syria

10/10/2012 9:22:11 PM

He notified them today - within the 48 hours required by the war powers resolution

10/10/2012 9:33:28 PM

You don't get it Jazon.

You just don't get it and you never will.

10/10/2012 10:39:41 PM

We've had troops in Syria for over a year now.

10/11/2012 2:09:14 AM

WTF does that have to do with population control???

10/11/2012 9:14:32 AM

Quote :

"You don't get it Jazon. You just don't get it and you never will."

Sucks for me.

But since you're teaching us all a big lesson, you probably shouldn't post completely irrelevant shit.

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 9:32 AM. Reason : ]

10/11/2012 9:30:23 AM

wars = population control

...?

10/11/2012 9:50:48 AM

Quote :

"New details emerge of second U.S. facility in violent Benghazi WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A public clash in Congress on Wednesday over photographs depicting the location of a second, semi-secret U.S. facility in Benghazi, Libya put the spotlight on a compound said to be more secure than the public American mission where U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens died last month. When State Department officials, describing the chain of events on the night Stevens and three others died in a terrorist attack, displayed commercial satellite images of the two U.S. facilities, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, sharply accused them of divulging classified material. "I was told specifically while I was in Libya I could not and should not ever talk about what you're showing here today," Chaffetz said at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. A congressional aide confirmed he was referring to the second site. The existence of the second compound has been widely reported in accounts of the September 11 violence in Benghazi, often being referred to as a "safe house" or "annex" to the temporary U.S. consulate. State Department officials at Wednesday's hearing said the photographs were not secret."

http://news.yahoo.com/details-emerge-second-u-facility-violent-benghazi-004216667.html



Nobody questions what else they are told not to talk about and anything they don't talk about is a conspiracy theory, right? The logic is as flawed as the statement itself.

10/11/2012 11:24:51 AM

What is this thread even about? Does anyone know anymore?

I'm sure it all ties in nicely to ^ but does any rational person get it?

10/11/2012 11:26:54 AM

Each post is a point of interest. It's no difference from simple surveillance tracking process for the activities of the US.

10/11/2012 11:33:58 AM

We are all very confused what this has to do with a discussion about population control and birth control.

Did you mean to post those in this thread?

10/11/2012 12:01:31 PM

I didn't think anyone reads this thread since I unintentionally highjacked it from page one.

10/11/2012 12:06:11 PM

so then why are you posting in it?

10/11/2012 12:11:20 PM

Easy to keep track of. I can access these "bookmarks" from any computer.

Why do you even care?

10/11/2012 12:19:13 PM

Because you seem schizoid

10/11/2012 12:22:25 PM

Well, let's see if there's some truth to your prognosis.

schizoid
Use Schizoid in a sentence Origin
schiz·oid
[skit-soid] Show IPA
adjective
1.
Psychology . of or pertaining to a personality disorder marked by dissociation, passivity, withdrawal, inability to form warm social relationships, and indifference to praise or criticism.


dissociation - nope
passivity - nope
withdrawal - nope
inability to form warm social relationships - I can, I just don't want to because it means compromise.
indifference to praise or criticism. - yes. why? because "Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" and praise is just a demotivational factor since I don't have to try as hard to meet expectations.

10/11/2012 12:41:45 PM

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001934/

boom

10/11/2012 12:51:44 PM

Quote :

"Symptoms People with paranoid personality disorder are highly suspicious of other people. As a result, people with this condition severely limit their social lives. They often feel that they are in danger, and look for evidence to support their suspicions. People with this disorder have trouble seeing that their distrustfulness is out of proportion to their environment. Common symptoms include: Concern that other people have hidden motives - It's a well known fact that EVERYONE has hidden motives, except for those without the capability of thinking that deep like my grandmother who is the sweetest lady you'd ever meet. When she does have hidden motives, you can always expect that it's something pleasant. As far as the government, there is more evidence than not to be suspicious about hidden motives. All you have to do is look at history. Expectation that they will be exploited by others - This is a reasonable expectation since I don't know when someone is or isn't exploiting me. It's more safe to assume everyone will exploit you than noone will exploit you. The only way to get passed this expectation is trust. There are numerous people I trust, such as my bank, my employees, and my vendors. I accept the fact that I may or may not be exploited and will be exploited at least once by an organization big and/or small by the time I die. Inability to work together with others - I can't communicate my thoughts efficiently or thoroughly enough. I'd ask someone to do something precisely and 99 times out of 100, the result never comes out the way I want. I don't have a problem talking to computer because 1) I can predict how it will respond to a command 2) If the computer doesn't respond the way I want, I have time to analyze, rephrase, or research my command. 3) I don't have to use inflection in my voice to get a point across. Because I know my shortcomings exist, I cannot be expected to hold other people upto the same strongcomings I possess such as math, science, and logic. For example, I get mentally frustrated to know someone has the inability to understand how money works and is constantly in debt. At the same time, I know you get mentally frustrated that I can't communicate with you at a precise and accurate level. Social isolation - nope, I work in public every day of my life, I know people from the site IRL, I have an entire group of people I associate with in the liberty movement. Detachment - I choose not to attach myself. It's petty. It's like crying when someone takes away your teddy bear as a child. The world is not affected by your attachment. It's all in your head and it's arbitrary to everything and everyone but to you. Hostility - I get mad just like everyone else who gets frustrated. For instance, yesterday when you said the national convention was just a show and that I'm the only one that takes it seriously, but you turn around and comment on Romney as if his policies were real. Stuff like that is just so ignorant that it really does piss me off. "

You're lucky that I take to time to explain my thinking process because I know you would never do the same in return.

10/11/2012 1:37:20 PM

The most proven and effective means of population control is to raise the general standard of living. People tend to be more conscious of their family planning when they actually live an in environment where they can have reasonable aspirations for a career. This is why the birth rate curve always closely follows the income curve, and why Japan, Europe, and America all have low, if not unsustainable birthrates.

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:08 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:07:59 PM

I thought birthrate coincided with free time.

10/11/2012 2:23:43 PM

I've never heard that, and that wouldn't explain why so many poor people with 2 or 3 jobs have so many kids.

10/11/2012 2:26:30 PM

Obviously not a perfect correlation, but it makes sense. More money = better education, better access to birth control, better life prospects that would be cut short by having a family early, etc. You want people to have fewer kids, give them a life and opportunities such that there's incentive to remain individualistic for a longer period of time. That way, when they finally do decide to have kids, they're usually already infertile from age!

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:27:29 PM

Quote :

"I've never heard that, and that wouldn't explain why so many poor people with 2 or 3 jobs have so many kids. "

welfare, child support

10/11/2012 2:31:39 PM

Do you actually, seriously, literally believe that welfare and child support make having additional children profitable?

Is this really a sincere belief that you hold, that welfare > costs of raising a child?

I know you used an emoticon, which might indicate you're being facetious, but it's hard to tell with statements like that, on a board like this...

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:34 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:33:26 PM

Quote :

"Do you actually, seriously, literally believe that welfare and child support make having additional children profitable? "

yes.

welfare is an excuse for women without a job or income to have children
and men must have 2 or 3 jobs to pay for child support/expenses for himself and for his children.


Yahoo explains it best:


How much money does the average welfare mom get per kid in California?
I'm curious how much these women get per kid.

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
More than the men who impregnated them do.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100210231414AAtplDg

10/11/2012 2:37:44 PM

Okay, you know that women get money for having kids.

Now you need to find out how much.

Then you need to know how much it costs to raise a kid.

Then you need to learn basic arithmetic.

Then you'll be able to explain to me why you believe it's profitable.

This is the basic procedure for explaining your position on an issue that involves numbers. I know this sounds daunting because it involves you doing some actual research instead of reading facebook and dailypaul.com, but this is what people with informed opinions do on a regular basis.

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:43:24 PM

Ironically enough, that very same yahoo answers page sums up your own position in all its stupidity:

Quote :

"I DON'T KNOW BUT IT IS WAY TOO MUCH"

10/11/2012 2:46:21 PM

Quote :

"Okay, you know that women get money for having kids. Now you need to find out how much. Then you need to know how much it costs to raise a kid. Then you need to learn basic arithmetic. Then you'll be able to explain to me why you believe it's profitable. This is the basic procedure for explaining your position on an issue that involves numbers."

Why do you need to know all of this if you already know that the government provides more than enough to survive comfortably.

10/11/2012 2:46:45 PM

I love how you're asking "Why do you need to know ALL THIS" when I'm literally only asking you for what amounts to two numbers. Benefits, and costs.

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:48:23 PM

Think about your question. What answer could possibly satisfy it?

10/11/2012 2:51:02 PM

So let me make sure I have this straight. You believe that all these women are putting themselves through 9 months of discomfort plus a few hours of the worst pain on Earth, years of nursing and hassle and close monitoring, food, school clothing, medical bills, and the 18,000 other headaches and expenses involved in raising a child, so they can collect a few hundred dollars a month for food. The child is, to them, entirely an instrument of wealth creation and they have no problem feeding the kid mac & cheese so they can eat lobster, because they are terrible heartless human beings.

You literally believe that these women are weighing those things and saying to themselves "Yes, I will definitely purposely impregnate myself and dedicate my entire life to managing children just so I can be a slumdog hundredaire" instead of going to a trade school once for 9 months and instantly upping their monthly income potential by thousands.

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM. Reason : .]

10/11/2012 2:51:29 PM

Quote :

"Think about your question. What answer could possibly satisfy it?"

An estimate of the cost of raising a child from ages 0-18.

An estimate of how much welfare a single mom can collect over 18 years.

X-Y = profit

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:54 PM. Reason : bear in mind there are lifetime limitations on welfare, it's not infinite]

10/11/2012 2:52:30 PM

Are you thrifty?
Are you frugal?
Do you buy USED?
Do you ask others for diaper donations or hand-me-downs to save money?
Do you know how to stretch a dollar?
Do you use coupons?
Do you save your money?
Do you have family that you can mooch off of?
Do you have friends that you can mooch off of?

10/11/2012 2:54:28 PM

Do you think raising a child is easier than having a job?

10/11/2012 2:57:33 PM

Quote :

"You literally believe that these women are weighing those things and saying to themselves "Yes, I will definitely purposely impregnate myself and dedicate my entire life to managing children just so I can be a hundredaire""

Yes, he actually believes this - and it's yet another reason why nothing he ever says can be taken seriously.

Quote :

"The most proven and effective means of population control is to raise the general standard of living."

[Edited on October 11, 2012 at 2:59 PM. Reason : ]

10/11/2012 2:57:57 PM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

10/11/2012 3:00:09 PM

Quote :

"Do you think raising a child is easier than having a job?"

I can imagine a situation in which raising a child is harder than having a job and I can imagine a situation in which having a job is harder than raising a child.

10/11/2012 3:00:53 PM

We all know you're very good at imagining things.

10/11/2012 3:02:26 PM