8/1/2011 2:37:48 PM
Arguing about how relationships *should* be practiced is like arguing how *religion* should be practiced, imo.[Edited on August 1, 2011 at 2:42 PM. Reason : .]
8/1/2011 2:40:26 PM
8/1/2011 2:41:48 PM
You honestly think that?
8/1/2011 2:42:56 PM
Probably not. Most white knighters aren't "dom"[Edited on August 1, 2011 at 2:47 PM. Reason : ]
8/1/2011 2:47:20 PM
8/1/2011 2:55:50 PM
how dom do you want the guy to be? if you want sub 24/7, you have to know those guys are not interested in letting you love anyone else, but some of them are down for loaning you out to friends after they feel like you're under control or you could get in a multi-sub situation. I doubt many serious masters are advertising themselves that way though. but if you want really want discipline on a regular basis, it always spills over to real life, including your friends. A truly dominant man will not allow you access to his feelings until he is certain he has real control over you. on the other hand, maybe there's something in all those limp-wristed guys that attracted you to them, and submission isn't what you're truly into. Do you want to be controlled or explore the limits of freedom? I think you should choose which scene really interests you. If the people you're with are trying to do something in between it may be that they are not genuinely interested in either. In any case, the fact that you have been deceived by people posing as dominant suggests that you need to focus more on initial selection and that whole butt-sniffing phase. If their socializing well with your friends is really important, don't keep them away, even at the very beginning. Same if having a dominant partner is truly a requirement. If it's something you insist on, you need to find out that their interest is genuine from the get-go, not slowly introduce it later and hope for the best. It's tempting to be a bit plastic and hyper-interested in their passions, and play down yours that you find embarrassing during that time period to facilitate bonding, but it's deceptive. Unfortunately it's a common element in courting, but only going to leave you frustrated if you employ this tactic or don't notice when others do it.
8/1/2011 3:08:36 PM
8/1/2011 4:00:43 PM
quagmire, can you please detail for us the length of your relationships just like sylver was kind enough to do?
8/1/2011 4:37:23 PM
I like how the posts stop here ^gg
8/11/2011 12:18:42 AM
I don't understand this thread. If you wanna fuck around, then fuck around. You don't have to put a cute name to it or defend yourself. It is your vagina, do what you want, when you want. If you decide you want to get married, then get married. And if you want to divorce in a few months, then get a divorce. Welcome to the 21st century. We're so glad you could join us.
8/11/2011 12:37:44 AM
pm sent
8/11/2011 12:39:13 AM
it's a shame this isn't in chit-chat[Edited on August 11, 2011 at 1:36 PM. Reason : hot dog + hallway]
8/11/2011 1:36:30 PM
+1 for move to chit chat
8/11/2011 1:50:49 PM
8/11/2011 1:53:00 PM
-1 move to chit chat
8/11/2011 2:00:36 PM
8/11/2011 3:24:11 PM
i love it how people keep feeding the attention whores on here.
8/11/2011 4:33:59 PM
it's tww what did you expect?
8/11/2011 4:38:32 PM
8/11/2011 5:07:56 PM
8/11/2011 8:02:53 PM
8/11/2011 11:04:53 PM
8/12/2011 12:16:00 PM
8/12/2011 12:38:45 PM
I highly doubt open and honest polyamory is sustainable.In my experience, at least one party gets emotionally attached after repeated fucking. Usually the female, or submissive one, but not always.I'd wager we are genetically wired for that response.
8/12/2011 2:07:16 PM
8/17/2011 5:37:06 AM