I didn't realize there were that many playoff teams...I have a better chance than I thought I did.
11/29/2011 12:17:24 PM
for those of you who want to continue this league next year, how do you want to go about selecting the teams (and amount of teams) in the league? the playoff teams? first 8? or 10? to say they want in? Keeper league, or re-draft?
11/29/2011 1:11:06 PM
If we're going to start a keeper we should start everything over from the beginning.[Edited on November 29, 2011 at 2:15 PM. Reason : -]
11/29/2011 2:14:47 PM
aka, are there any teams that have "given up" by not setting lineups in the last few weeks? (Can't look it up right now) If so, they should be the first to get to the boot. Even if you can't make the playoffs you should set your lineup every week, it can make a big difference for those who are trying to get into the playoffs.^Agreed, we can't decide to do keepers now. Fred Jackson is a prime example. He was probably dropped (by me maybe, not sure if I drafted him in this league) and he would have been someone to hold on to if we were doing keepers.[Edited on November 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM. Reason : .]
11/29/2011 2:22:08 PM
11/29/2011 3:12:48 PM
Agree with the above posts. Weed out the people who dont participate weekly or give up once they cant make the playoffs. Once we do this a 10-12 league will be easy to make. Also, re-do the draft and decide beforehand if it will be keeper.
11/29/2011 3:23:22 PM
12/6/2011 8:03:58 PM
12/7/2011 2:12:55 AM
^ LOL I'm suprised it took that long for a call out. Well the difference with Pointspread is, it doesn't affect anybody if I don't play pointsspread every week. Actually, I made it easier on you since you don't have to check to find my 2 wins per week.
12/7/2011 7:49:31 AM
I have set my lineup every week and would like in. I agree with 10-12 people and would be ok with doing keepers after next year/$
12/7/2011 8:33:49 AM
got a question, do you like seattle's D vs the Rams or New England's D at Washington? i'm thinking both are a good start, just dont know which one would be better
12/7/2011 4:38:49 PM
i'll play and 10-12 is good. 14 has been frustrating but is a nice change up from 10. I think 12 would be a good number as you can actually find some people in FA.
12/7/2011 6:30:27 PM
looks like i've got wahoowa in back-to-back weeks...i kicked ass last week so hopefully it will happen again.
12/8/2011 2:44:57 AM
^ I heard Cam Newton pulled a hammy and might be out.
12/8/2011 8:22:19 AM
Well that does it for Marvin's Twits. Last minute call between Crabtree, Washington, and Brown at WR didn't work out too well , plus my own D dropping a -7 didn't help. I'll be back to win this next year[Edited on December 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM. Reason : Got outscored by 31 on Defense ]
12/12/2011 8:53:19 AM
#1 seed going in....eliminated in first round....as goes the fantasy season.
12/12/2011 8:54:50 AM
I'm done. My only reliable receivers/running backs were all hurting.Get well soon, Greg Jennings.
12/12/2011 12:12:58 PM
So in my money league playoff matchup it came down to Cruz for me vs Nicks for the other guy. I had a 23 point cushion going in, feeling good. On the last drive, I was pretty sure that Nicks brought in a 9 yard catch, but my stattracker gave it to Cruz. The other guy saw the same thing, and it also appears to be on a forum or 2 that the stat trackers messed up. I ended up winning the matchup by 4, but that catch takes 2 away from Cruz and gives them to Nicks. I own the tiebreakers, but am now vulnerable to any other stat corrections.-Anyone know a site that has any stat corrections from yesterday?-Anybody else see the play in question or may be affected by it?
12/12/2011 6:34:01 PM
I just had one of my best weeks all season when it mattered the least.
12/25/2011 12:17:23 AM