11/15/2008 3:35:06 PM
11/15/2008 3:35:22 PM
he did coke, he "fried his brain from coke"stop talking
11/15/2008 3:36:05 PM
11/15/2008 3:36:54 PM
you didnt read obama's bio obviously .. he did coke, frequently[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 3:39 PM. Reason : crack, im sorry][Edited on November 15, 2008 at 3:41 PM. Reason : you certainly dont hear this on msnbc]
11/15/2008 3:38:03 PM
[/thread]
11/15/2008 3:41:41 PM
seriously, man. i'm with you.why isn't the liberal media continuously reporting on this, everyday. i need updates. there is certainly nothing more important going on in the world than obama's admitted drug use several decades ago.[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 3:58 PM. Reason : .]
11/15/2008 3:57:42 PM
Obama has been honest about his past in that area. Bush was evasive, which drew more scrutiny. Plus, Bush had a reputation with alcohol and partying, which was the bigger issue because it was responsible for his shitty college performance, not so much his coke use. Obama did not have these issues. So your contention that Obama admitted to doing the same thing or has done the same thing as Bush is wrong. And the media didn't give the same scrutiny with Obama in this area because he was not as evasive about it. And, I think Bush's mini-stroke moments led to more curiosity about his past because people wondered whether it would affect his capacity to be president. Obama's cognitive ability has never been a negative.[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 4:12 PM. Reason : .]
11/15/2008 4:11:47 PM
are you kidding meit would be headline news if bush had admitted to it, which he hasnt, unless youve seen him do it then no evidence .. barack has admitted to it .. congrats, his morals are just as badyou still havnt answered why its big news when liberal journalists reports it, with little or no proof, and kept obama clean, like i said, hes been free of any media scutiny[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 4:19 PM. Reason : ]
11/15/2008 4:19:04 PM
You fail at making any kind of intelligent reply, so I have nothing more to say.
11/15/2008 4:24:24 PM
k ... amuse me, answer the claim[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 4:42 PM. Reason : being forthcomming does not condone the use]
11/15/2008 4:40:57 PM
^^^How does admitting to prior drug use make one's morals bad?
11/15/2008 11:07:14 PM
-- Barack Obama experimented with drugs in high school.-- George W. Bush "experimented" with drugs as a pilot in the Texas Air National Guard, and as a 30-year-old republican campaign worker.clearly, George W. is the superior moral person. because he found Jesus and that's what stopped his boozing, coke snorting ways.
11/16/2008 1:23:07 AM
^You are entirely missing the point (and promoting anit-Bush propaganda while defending Obama for doing the exact same thing).They both delved into illegal practices. Both men! Both were wrong.Now lets take the first step towards removing your political blinders.........Say it with me......Bush and Obama were wrong. One more time....Bush and Obama were wrong.....Bush was wrong.....Obama was wrong.....
11/17/2008 10:22:15 AM
I actually don't believe that either one of them was wrong for drug use if it didn't interfere with their normal daily lives and they managed to continue being productive.that being said, it appears if this stipulation doesn't apply to bush as he readily admits that his use adversely affected him and did so during a stage in his life when his judgment has more weight, namely being a parent.the times in their life where they partook in these similar actions are hugely different. doing drugs in college when you have little responsibility and when the ones you do have solely affect you is tremendously different than doing so when you're a father to two and have a wife.
11/17/2008 12:25:06 PM
First off, A crime is a crime. Illegal is illegal. Both men lacked judgement and both are PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE for their actions.If you want to argue for a change in federal and state law for drug legalization thats fine, but thats not what were discussing here. They were both wrong! I want to see if you guys can just admit that Obama was wrong for once in your lives.
11/17/2008 12:53:11 PM
I hold you PERSONAL RESPONSIBLE for such crap posts
11/17/2008 12:55:51 PM
11/17/2008 1:09:28 PM
IR Serious CatThis R Serious PostHey hooksaw, what do you think of MSNBC?[Edited on November 18, 2008 at 4:45 PM. Reason : .]
11/18/2008 4:44:49 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081217/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama;_ylt=AnX3o5SRE18V5pZB9bw1FCGyFz4D
12/17/2008 6:26:53 PM
Hearst Looks to Sell or Close Seattle Paper
1/14/2009 12:43:05 AM
1/22/2009 3:19:41 PM
I didn't realize this thread was hooksaw's personal blog.I recommend visiting this site: https://www.godaddy.com/
1/22/2009 3:24:04 PM
1/22/2009 4:34:01 PM
When journalist Donna Brazile was asked about stealing Obama's presidental blanket from the White House, she responds: “We have a black President. [holds up blanket] This is free.”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpkm0xdfghA
1/22/2009 5:35:47 PM
bush's cocaine thing was more about him being a horrible student.i dont even remember this being a big deal on the news.
1/22/2009 5:44:51 PM
bump by request
6/9/2009 6:45:59 PM
6/9/2009 6:51:30 PM
Yeah its hard to get credible news about our government these days. Most of the media outlets are too busy dealing with carpet burn on their knees.
6/10/2009 8:43:57 AM
lol
6/10/2009 9:22:46 AM
6/10/2009 9:23:29 AM
LONDON SHOCK FASHION: MICHELLE AND THE ORANGE SNAKEhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1191620/First-Lady-flamboyance-Michelle-Obamas-confident-duty-chic-London-city-break.html
6/10/2009 10:03:19 AM
The terrible shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Museum was the lead story on ABC's World News with Charles Gibson June 10, 2009--as it should have been. Yet, I do not recall any coverage by World News of the equally terrible shooting of a young U.S. soldier by a Muslim extremist on June 1, 2009. Why the difference, I wonder?
6/11/2009 2:30:29 AM
because muslim extremists typically try to kill soldiers while 88 year old ppl dont typically shoot up security guards at museums?
6/11/2009 2:35:57 AM
88 YEAR OLD NEO NAZIS WOOOOOOOOO
6/11/2009 8:49:58 AM
6/11/2009 9:26:51 AM
I have to admit, Im pretty impressed how most of the media is going after Letterman.http://www.charlotteobserver.com/747/story/774789.html
6/11/2009 11:19:02 AM
The Today Show is "the media"?
6/11/2009 12:50:33 PM
Its from NBC the officially sanctioned network.. still impressive. Most of the others have commented against his comments too.
6/11/2009 1:38:36 PM
So is Regis and Kelly also "the media"? As well? I'm just wondering how low on the vapidity line we have to go before it's no longer considered "the media"?
6/11/2009 2:59:54 PM
^x5 Are you serious? You consider that a valid response?^^^ Um. . .The Today Show is part of NBC News. Fail Boat really is a good username for you.
6/11/2009 5:08:24 PM
Ok, if you include The Today Show in with your MSM criteria then you absolutely have no reason to be critical of the MSM. I'm sorry your standards are so low.
6/11/2009 5:50:15 PM
^ It's not my standard. The Today Show is part of NBC News, period.
6/11/2009 6:12:37 PM
It absolutely is your standard. If you give two shits what The Today Show has to say about the state of the union, you've failed. Hard.
6/11/2009 6:42:58 PM
6/11/2009 8:36:26 PM
I'm not even debating that fact, so how the hell am I wrong you old fucking douche? You've owned yourself because you think The Today Show is a serious MSM outlet. There is no amount of posting over and over again that they do in fact deliver news that can save you from this. Now go get paranoid and disappear from the wolf web again.
6/11/2009 8:50:43 PM
^
6/11/2009 8:53:38 PM
Daltowned.
6/11/2009 9:21:50 PM
yes, lots of shows "deliver the news", but that doesn't mean they are "news shows"O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Hannity? According to your other thread, O'Reilly viewers are as well informed on current events as NPR listeners, but does that mean he is news? Sure, he delivers news, but with a healthy dose of commentary and snark. The Today Show? Regis and Kelly? The Early Show? Entertainment shows, which, yes, have some news content. What else do you expect them to talk about for 4 hours?
6/11/2009 9:58:09 PM
6/11/2009 10:36:35 PM