I have a lot invested in Obama, but not so much that I lose all rationability.
10/2/2008 2:35:50 PM
10/2/2008 2:36:27 PM
link?
10/2/2008 2:39:17 PM
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1008/McCain_pulling_out_of_Michigan.html?showall
10/2/2008 2:46:36 PM
well, that is the final nail in the McCain coffin.
10/2/2008 2:48:40 PM
^not necessarily. as much as i'd hate to say it, palin might pull a rabbit out of the hat tonight. not by demonstrating a commanding knowledge of the issues, but possibly by resorting to snottiness and name calling much like she did at the rnc. and if biden loses his cool, it could give the gop another palin bump. i hope i'm wrong though.
10/2/2008 3:22:21 PM
i love how people think she can somehow revolutionize things as evidenced by her initial base surge introduction. I mean, no one knew her and she was exotic so of course there would be a bump....However to think that would replicate because she is somehow a magical political figure as opposed to an inexperienced and generally awful politician is crazy to me. I mean, I guess there's a chance but I don't see how. I do know that the pundits will spin her talking in English as a WIN OMG COMEBACK KID but honestly, how will this change the predicament McCain's campaign finds himself in?
10/2/2008 3:30:21 PM
Obama's recent bump in the polls has little to do with either Obama or McCain, and everything to do with the economy and the fact a Republican is in the White House. It's not like Obama has some sort of amazing plan that will make everything better, hell, if anything some of his policies would make matters worse, listen to his rhetoric about "protecting American jobs, stopping outsourcing, etc" that is just protectionism. We know how well that helps a downturn economy You still have about 6-8% undecided in pretty much every poll, and that polls have been so volatile I find it hard to call the game just yet. Obama has been up 8%, down 6%, up 4%, tied, and up 3% in about a months time, that shows a finicky, unimpressed, and undecided electorate. Does it look good for Obama right now? Yeah, but that is because of the events of the past week which have been out of the hands of either candidate. I wouldn't be counting my chickens just yet.
10/2/2008 3:32:56 PM
Pulling out of Michigan basically signals that McCain is acknowleding his loss.
10/2/2008 3:34:40 PM
.. yeah, in Michigan. Michigan wasn't critical to their electoral strategy. Republicans haven't won Michigan since Bush Sr.
10/2/2008 3:42:08 PM
They have no electoral strategy. In order for McCain to win this year he needed Michigan. he's already bled off too many Bush states to not need Michigan.
10/2/2008 3:43:23 PM
Pulling out Michigan means he's essentially going to focus all his efforts on winning Pennsylvania and just hoping he gets lucky everywhere else.
10/2/2008 3:46:39 PM
10/2/2008 3:56:32 PM
Not unreasonable, and doesn't signal defeat. Michigan was a long shot to begin with. I doesn't have to win Penn either, though if he doesn't he can't lose Va, Fl, Ohio. He could still lose Co.
10/2/2008 3:56:47 PM
He can't afford to lose Iowa, New Mexico, or Colorado and still expect to win. Him losing those three Bush states signifies that McCain has to pick up a least 1 Kerry State to win and he won't do it.Obama already has 269 electoral votes from states where the margin is above 5%. Obama doesn't need to win any of the remaining battleground states and he is the de facto president due to the projected make up of the House of Representatives.[Edited on October 2, 2008 at 4:18 PM. Reason : .]
10/2/2008 4:16:20 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/74vm0/eight_words_can_win_biden_the_debate_tonight_now/lollercaust
10/2/2008 4:34:48 PM
McCain didn't quit nearly as early as Obamahttp://elections.foxnews.com/2008/08/22/obama-stops-advertising-in-red-battleground-states/
10/2/2008 4:38:09 PM
^
10/2/2008 4:42:21 PM
Yeah that's awfully inaccurate. It's Fox though, that says it all. Pulling out of Michigian is big news and to say it was always a long shot is just ignorant. In fact McCain was polling ahead of Obama there only 3-4 weeks back. Obama is spending and has spent a shitload in Florida and NC in particular. Virginia has seen ton of continued attention, hell he has nearly 50 campaign offices in that state alone! Only relevant ones listed here are Alaska, Montana, and Georgia - and come on, how is that suprising at all. Those are strong base states.
10/2/2008 4:56:59 PM
10/2/2008 5:11:48 PM
10/2/2008 5:54:57 PM
And here's an ad Obama has been running in Appalachia and the South: http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/new_obama_ad_in_south_stars_bl.phpSeems like a good ad to me.
10/2/2008 6:08:18 PM
10/2/2008 6:16:06 PM
^^ Seems a little blatant. Hey, these folks like bluegrass, right? Let's get a famous bluegrass artist to tell them to vote for Obama. Standard, but this sort of targeted marketing typically makes me a little uncomfortable. Like that update Google explained via personalized analogies.[Edited on October 2, 2008 at 6:29 PM. Reason : that's not to say the ad didn't appeal to me]
10/2/2008 6:19:01 PM
^ yeah, it's generic, but that's what works. Look at any successful advertising campaign, ever.People know that advertisers will put tits anywhere to sell something, and yet it still works.
10/2/2008 6:23:57 PM
funny how if that guy wasnt endorsing obama he'd be a "dumb redneck"
10/2/2008 6:25:01 PM
^ no, just the people listening to him
10/2/2008 6:26:05 PM
10/2/2008 6:50:00 PM
http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200881001026
10/2/2008 7:40:30 PM
^^seriously, you are retarded. Having a local favored son release a campaign ad is big and isn't stereotyping.
10/2/2008 8:18:40 PM
10/2/2008 8:33:47 PM
oh fuckhere we go
10/2/2008 9:03:43 PM
You know the Republicans have all but collapsed when Charles Krauthammer is writing off McCain. Sure, he backhands Obama as many times as he can in his limited print space, but in the end:
10/3/2008 1:20:09 AM
10/3/2008 8:16:14 AM
New Hampshire Battleground Poll: Obama +10from TIME: Real Clear PoliticsObama 53 (+6 vs. last poll, Sept. 23) McCain 43 (-6) Obama...BOOYA. It's only 4 EV's but this state is pulling away.
10/3/2008 9:20:04 AM
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/new_hampshire/election_2008_new_hampshire_presidential_electionAnother one from Rasmussen (the fox news poll) showing Obama +10 in New Hampshire. That means that New Mexico, Colorado, Iowa, and New Hampshire are at the moment out of reach for McCain. Now he has has to steal one of the Kerry blue states to even have a chance, and since he's pulled out of Michigan, the only one left with even a remote chance of turning is PA.
10/3/2008 9:47:20 AM
Well I don't think Colorado is out of reach for him. But now he is FORCED to defend a swing state with his life since he gave up on Michigan....all while bleeding support from NC, VA, FL, NV, MO namely that are all trending Obama...where each of them would spell disaster for him. UNLESS he thinks he can pick of PA which I just think would never happen. Basically, he has to win all of those above despite the trend, AND win Colorado which is polling better for Obama. PLUS we are operating that Ohio is a given for McCain but that ALSO is swing. Flat out, in terms of the EV I wouldn't want to be him right now.
10/3/2008 9:51:54 AM
imagine if mccain supporters actually participated in polls
10/3/2008 9:59:39 AM
imagine if they polled cell phones as well as land lines.
10/3/2008 10:04:53 AM
they're so maverick they won't even vote in Nov.
10/3/2008 10:06:21 AM
imagine if working class people were up at 12:30 on a weeknight submitting online polls
10/3/2008 10:07:46 AM
^ oh yeah of course, it's not the McCain supporters sitting around the house eating Wurther's Originals that pick up their rotary telephones...they're not supporting. It's just the Obama college kids.
10/3/2008 10:07:58 AM
i just wouldnt put too much stock in polls...didnt your high expectations and subsequent disappointment in 2004 where polls projected kerry to win teach you a lesson? why would you get your hopes up based on something as unreliable as telemarketing?
10/3/2008 10:13:46 AM
Never , at any point in 2004, did Kerry hold such a large lead in the national polls or in the individual state polls. It basically stayed within the margin of error up until election day.
10/3/2008 10:16:54 AM
10/3/2008 10:18:54 AM
10/3/2008 10:21:48 AM
10/3/2008 10:25:15 AM
2004 was much closer in national polls, though Kerry lost a few states where he was consistently polling higher. 2000 on the other hand, is somewhat similar to this year, where Gore had a large lead in polls, though I don't remember the polls being so volatile (changing so rapidly and widely).
10/3/2008 10:26:13 AM
10/3/2008 10:27:51 AM
did any of us say anything about exit polls?
10/3/2008 10:35:50 AM