Maybe the right should grab their bootstraps and get their shit together.
2/22/2017 9:50:04 AM
2/22/2017 10:32:59 AM
It's a hack and a troll so doesn't care.
2/22/2017 10:37:43 AM
Sweden is the rape capital of the world. They literally had to stop tracking the stats of rapists, and then stop tracking rapes all together to avoid revealing how immigration isn't working.I'm assuming Trump did what he normally does: gets the leftist media to talk about what he wants them to talk about (subject wise).
2/22/2017 10:40:52 AM
Nope, we don't need the EPA http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/13-whatever-happened-to-acid-rain
2/22/2017 10:45:17 AM
^^Oh, so you eat up the Sweden narrative, too? How unsurprisingly hypocritical of you[Edited on February 22, 2017 at 10:45 AM. Reason : ^^]
2/22/2017 10:45:39 AM
He gets his news from Sean Hannity. What do you expect.
2/22/2017 10:49:34 AM
^^ I'm not using anecdotal, or cherry-picked evidence to suggest something. I don't even have to point to the numbers, because the fact that Sweden is deliberately hiding the evidence is all the proof you need. The migrants come from a culture that isn't compatible. Though the hypocrisy of leftists bitching about nonexistent "rape culture" in college then turning a blind eye to an actual rape culture from Islamic countries is hilarious.
2/22/2017 10:56:48 AM
sounds like a narrative to me.please provide proof that Sweden is deliberately hiding evidence, and has "literally" stopped tracking "the stats of rapists". what are your sources for these claims? and why do you trust them?(i know, why am i bothering? but i really am curious about the psychology of internet trolls. in this case, i wonder if it a complete act and it recognizes its hypocrisy but the joy of trolling is too overwhelming to care, or if really is that hypocritically stupid)
2/22/2017 11:02:58 AM
JCE visits Sweden often and has seen it with his own eyes!Facts are hidden. You'll never know without visiting!!!
2/22/2017 11:06:09 AM
Sweden's rape numbers are high because it has one of the broadest legal definitions of rape and counts multiple rape/assault charges as individual incidents.
2/22/2017 11:15:47 AM
^^^message_topic.aspx?topic=646702&page=1I love it when Bullet feels brave enough to take a break from trolling and spamming and actually tries to challenge something. We will see how many posts he lasts.[Edited on February 22, 2017 at 11:17 AM. Reason : ^^^ 2 many SJWs]
2/22/2017 11:16:33 AM
oh boy, let's!
2/22/2017 11:18:05 AM
2/22/2017 11:23:29 AM
I asked it to provide sources and explain why he trusts those and it posted a link to a TWW thread. It would be nice if it could just provide some sources that confirm the claims that it made, and explain why it trusts those sources. It seems to me it trusts sources when they reinforce its beliefs, but otherwise it's just the media pushing narratives.[Edited on February 22, 2017 at 11:37 AM. Reason : ]
2/22/2017 11:30:46 AM
Soros is gonna go broke if the GOP keeps setting up these town halls
2/22/2017 11:45:46 AM
When was the last time JCE left the continent?
2/22/2017 11:47:11 AM
Supposedly it was recently in California (doubtful though)
2/22/2017 11:55:18 AM
He screens his potential vacations by the local Taco Bell Yelp reviews.
2/22/2017 12:02:26 PM
2/22/2017 1:38:45 PM
so i take it that Nya Tider (New Times) is one of the credible media sources you recommend?
2/22/2017 1:46:57 PM
Not sure, I don't read Sweden News sources. I'm sure it will be taken down by the government soon though
2/22/2017 1:51:20 PM
i mean you give everyone such a hard time about using fake news sources, i wanted to make sure that's a source i can trustis it fake news or are they credible?
2/22/2017 1:57:02 PM
When I google Springare, the top sites are: Foxnews, wikipedia, breitbart, bluelivesmatter, express.co.uk, and RT. Are you sure they are credible and not just trying to push a narrative? After quickly looking into many of your recent claims, i'm noticing that each one was recently covered in the last day or two on Foxnews. I don't know if that can be trusted as a completely credible source.And what makes you trust the claims of some random retired swedish cop? How do you know that guy is credible? How do you not know he had some greivance and has an agenda to push a false narrative.You really need to explain your logic on what you trust and find credible versus what is fake and pushing an agenda. Because the more you try, the more it just sounds like you trust stories that fit your beliefs, and dismiss the others.[Edited on February 22, 2017 at 2:01 PM. Reason : ]
2/22/2017 1:57:43 PM
Well fortunately that is all just supplemental to your original request. The first quote from Wikipedia answered your challenge. Ignore the rest if you don't trust it, though I would say the fact that the cop is being arrested for speaking up about it speaks volumes.
2/22/2017 2:08:33 PM
but how can i know if the cop has been arrested for speaking up, which media source should i use to check?for example, even brietbart and fox say nothing about an arrest. i think you are making that up, i think the arrest is fake news. [Edited on February 22, 2017 at 2:14 PM. Reason : .]
2/22/2017 2:11:18 PM
^^the first quote from Wikipedia doesn't answer my challenge. It just says the bra stopped releasing detailed data on rapes by immigrants since 1996. First off, why should I trust Wikipedia? And second, you're using that lone quote, with no other details, to justify all the other claims you're making? What does it mean "detailed data"? Does that mean they just stopped releasing some of the details they used to include, like their age? Or how long they'd been in the country? It says the Bra stopped releasing the detailed data. Did another agency continue or start to release data? Did the Bra stop releasing all rape data, or just immigrant rape data? Why did they stop in 1996? What was immigration like in 1996? I mean, if that's the only quote you're using , talk about spinning a "narrative". How do you not see that you do the exact same thing you criticize all the SJWs for doing? Oh right, you're just trolling while trying to push your narrative.[Edited on February 22, 2017 at 2:43 PM. Reason : What am I doing?]
2/22/2017 2:22:54 PM
You realize in the time it took you to type those 10 questions you could have just Googled the wiki quote to see the full context?The fact is you can't find out what % of migrants are responsible for what crimes because Sweden stopped tracking those factors in their data. I'm not sure how you are confused by that, or if you're just trying to troll since I don't think you ever actually post seriously.
2/22/2017 2:40:56 PM
LOL. That quote is credited to Larsdotter, Anna (3 February 2003). "Brottsoffer i skymundan" (in Swedish). Populär Historia. Retrieved 29 March 2015. Why should I trust that source? Why do you trust that source? Why do you trust Wikipedia? Do you know what Wikipedia is?
2/22/2017 2:46:18 PM
lol, no comment on the arrest fake news
2/22/2017 2:49:42 PM
http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/trump-exaggerates-swedish-crime/Is this more or less credible than Wikipedia?
2/22/2017 2:56:24 PM
2/22/2017 5:12:27 PM
2/22/2017 5:43:05 PM
I don't think anyone claims Trump is antisemitic himself. Hell his favorite child married a Jew (who is also his close adviser) and converted herself.But it's no secret the he courts antisemitic votes and his "anti-PC" rhetoric emboldens racist groups.
2/22/2017 6:17:49 PM
2/22/2017 9:13:13 PM
^Exactly, and neither was the Jewish reporter. I'm sick of this exchange:Reporter: Mr. President, Jews are being targeted.Trump: BUT I WON 306 ELECTORAL VOTES! THAT'S LIKE THE MOST EVER!Reporter: Obama had 365 and 332Trump: I MEAN THE MOST FOR A REPUBLICAN. EVER!Reporter: Bush Sr. had 426.Trump: WRONG! LIES! FAKE NEWS! IT'S WHAT I WAS TOLD!Reporter: So about that anti-Semitism...Trump:
2/22/2017 10:08:48 PM
Surfed over to the_donald with hopes of drinking in the tears of all those alleged transgender people that were so gung-ho for Trump. Unfortunately, I could only find "George Takkei is running a Hollywood child rape ring" conspiracy theories. Oh wells.
2/23/2017 7:51:35 AM
well they ban anyone with an opinion/narrative they don't like so...
2/23/2017 8:36:24 AM
#snowflakes
2/23/2017 8:38:29 AM
Because all trans people are a victimhood monolith that fits perfectly into whatever the DNC's agenda requires them to
2/23/2017 9:13:35 AM
seems like that is a pretty innocent assumption when you compare it to the assumption that all trans people are mentally disturbed and are out to rape our daughters in the restroom. The former leads to productive conversation on norms, the latter leads to neo-confederates dragging you behind their pickup truck through the middle of town. States Rights!!!!!!!!!
2/23/2017 9:32:50 AM
If a trans person uses the bathroom they identify with and someone complains that it upset them who is crying victim in this situation?Who actually had the victim complex?
2/23/2017 9:52:02 AM
Ironically enough it isn't "neoconfederates" killing trans people (though I can see how you would love that for a narrative).In terms of transgender homicides it is overwhelmingly black men killing black transgendered people. It's an awkward dilemma for leftists because they want to reference the dead transgendered people, but they don't want to reference black on black violence.
2/23/2017 10:44:00 AM
do you want to change the subject and talk about the fragile psyche of men?
2/23/2017 10:48:53 AM
You love to use statistics and data to refute arguments, so why is it you can't internalize that transgender folks attacking women in bathrooms is virtually non-existent?
2/23/2017 10:50:49 AM
Straw man.Where have I said that it is existent?
2/23/2017 10:53:10 AM
But look! Black dudes are doing something!!!Ignore the man behind the curtain!!!
2/23/2017 10:55:26 AM
Sources?
2/23/2017 11:01:31 AM
Also the "straw man" is what has been repeated by several state legislatures to defend passing bathroom Bills.
2/23/2017 11:03:53 AM
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-39049670
2/23/2017 11:18:32 AM