http://pamshouseblend.firedoglake.com/2013/01/02/illinois-gop-chair-asks-republican-lawmakers-to-support-marriage-equality-bill/
1/2/2013 9:14:24 PM
Interesting...
1/2/2013 9:25:58 PM
1/3/2013 2:01:04 AM
I realize this is nit-picking, and it happens to plenty of politicians, but i figured i'd put it herehttp://www.wral.com/idaho-senator-pleads-guilty-in-va-to-dwi-charge/11941953/
1/4/2013 12:33:29 PM
Sounds like he was cheating on his wife, got drunk and ran a red light on way home
1/4/2013 1:16:55 PM
http://www.newsday.com/news/republican-party-seems-as-divided-angry-as-ever-1.4409569
1/5/2013 4:23:19 PM
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/01/15/1452861/walter-jones-muslim-books/
1/15/2013 6:47:42 PM
for a House Republicans retreat
1/17/2013 12:51:53 PM
That's something they should be studying. I'd break the lecture into two bullet points:- Don't refer to all black people as criminals or welfare queens- Don't talk about rape, ever, in fact avoid anything possibly related to female organs[Edited on January 17, 2013 at 1:22 PM. Reason : ]
1/17/2013 1:21:22 PM
^^One start on the "communication with minorities" front could be this:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_color
1/17/2013 1:33:35 PM
My god you are so partisan, what they wrote is fineJesus
1/17/2013 4:16:34 PM
You've misunderstood the situation if you read that as partisan.
1/17/2013 4:25:38 PM
You are trying to criticize them for using "minorities" when using that is fineYou also assume they only mean "persons of color" and not other minorities. Without seeing an agenda, I'm not sure how you made that assumption. It's dumb partisan criticism
1/17/2013 5:16:30 PM
i think the funnier part is they're having a meeting about how to talk to black folks on a fucking plantation
1/17/2013 8:12:44 PM
1/17/2013 8:36:39 PM
Now this is just lovely,http://news.yahoo.com/gop-eyes-election-laws-091622720--election.html
1/18/2013 12:21:14 PM
This country was designed without democratic elections for a reasonso lets make elections more democratic
1/18/2013 12:34:57 PM
^^ It's not really any different from all the calls after Bush's elections to eliminate the electoral college completely and go with a popular vote. It's also not without precedent, Maine and Nebraska already do something similar.^ Well, depending on how it's allocated, it could still have the benefits of the electoral system. Consider for example NY state, which other than the NYC / Long Island area, actually tends to vote republican. A proportional system would give a voice to that large swath of the state. On the other hand, a directly proportional system would basically have all the problems of proportional voting. They could allocate by district, but that has the potential for the same problem that the winner take all system has in that if you're a small blue or red enclave in a larger opposite district, your voice is more or less meaningless.[Edited on January 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM. Reason : sdh]
1/18/2013 12:37:16 PM
Also, requiring the designated voters to vote for the winner reduced the power of the electoral college as well.
1/18/2013 12:40:32 PM
^ Yeah, that and the direct election of the VP rather than the VP simply being the second place candidate.
1/18/2013 12:55:15 PM
1/18/2013 1:07:01 PM
Honestly it's a bit more nuanced than I expected. I would not be surprised in the least if one suggested that electoral college votes be proportional to land area with a straight face.
1/18/2013 3:56:26 PM
1/18/2013 8:21:14 PM
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-york-city-leading-gop-mayoral.html#disqus_thread
1/19/2013 1:24:20 PM
Crazy news out of Virginia today. While the Senate democrats were attending the inauguration, the Republicans redrew the districts and eliminated a Democratic seat. Democrats controlled the Senate.http://www.bluevirginia.us/diary/8554/breaking-while-dems-distracted-by-inauguration-virginia-senate-gop-stages-a-coup
1/21/2013 4:57:37 PM
^ democrats? it was just one guy that didn't vote....there are 40 senators and 39 of them voted on thishttp://www.dailyprogress.com/news/article_f1baf8ae-6418-11e2-abf8-0019bb30f31a.html
1/21/2013 8:23:37 PM
doesn't change the fact that it was a bitch ass move by the republicans
1/21/2013 9:48:59 PM
I don't think they'll get away with it. How can they redistrict in a non-redistricting year? All they did was fuck themselves for the next couple of years and get a ton of negative nationwide press.
1/21/2013 10:03:49 PM
1/22/2013 11:32:36 AM
Lemme show you yokels how we yankees do gerrymandering, and we do it RIGHT!The PA GOP is now trying to change our EV system so that each districts get an EV, rather than winner takes all.Pennsylvania Popular Vote: Obama 52-46%District-By-District: Romney 70-30%[Edited on January 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM. Reason : If ya can't beat em, cheat em!]
1/22/2013 1:51:46 PM
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/23/boehner-says-obamas-focus-is-to-annihilate-the-republican-party/?hpt=hp_t3I dont know why but I laughed at the Lou Holtz part.
1/24/2013 8:51:08 AM
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/01/new-mexico-law-would-send-rape-victims-jail-aborting-evidence/61368/beyond disgusting
1/24/2013 12:31:29 PM
1/24/2013 10:08:57 PM
http://whotv.com/2013/01/27/the-insiders-brennan-and-kochel-part-4/
1/28/2013 2:03:32 PM
Sadly, he may just be an outlier. I doubt the GOP are in touch enough with reality to tell the Religious Right to grow up and accept equality. Oh, maybe someone can help me out with this. What is the Right's strategery behind their funding groups and think tanks pushing for a budget now? I know what they are up to with jumping on board with immigration reform now, but the budget thing is perplexing. And it's too convenient to simply say "Well, a budget is a good thing, and the GOP wants good governance." ....
1/28/2013 2:54:28 PM
Republican Party fractured. Libertarians want to move forward, but the Religious Right is going to continue to be a bunch of neanderthals for generations to come. Their policy goals no longer align.
1/28/2013 4:37:43 PM
Can you blame them?If you thought you were going to burn in Hell for NOT fighting for something, wouldn't you fight to the bitter end for it?
1/28/2013 5:43:56 PM
Yes, if I were dumb enough to believe that I would burn in Hell for doing, or not doing, something then I would probably fight for that cause. But I'm not that dumb.There is literally no argument left to be made to the Religious Right other than to call them fucking morons to their faces. It enrages me how stupid and ignorant they are even after being presented with the truth. They are destroying this country.[Edited on January 28, 2013 at 10:53 PM. Reason : ]
1/28/2013 10:51:09 PM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/30/tennessee-dont-say-gay-bill_n_2582390.html?utm_hp_ref=gay-voicesi'm so sick of the GOP claiming to be the part of small government
1/31/2013 9:43:12 AM
I am waiting for the NC GOP to start the anti flag burning amendment because they care about jobs.
2/1/2013 8:05:16 AM
^^^b-b-b-but it's not religion that's the problem, they'd draft/vote for bigoted and archaic laws for some other reason if they weren't religious, right?[Edited on February 1, 2013 at 9:32 AM. Reason : .]
2/1/2013 9:30:31 AM
2/1/2013 2:12:02 PM
Take it back for the lord!
2/1/2013 2:43:55 PM
Well, I was wrong. My inner cynic lead me to believe that the reason why the GOP was slobbering all over Kerry for Secretary of State was so that they would have a seemingly slam dunk chance of winning his seat in MA for Scott Brown. That is not the case however.Scott Brown not seeking Kerry's Senate seat
2/1/2013 2:54:22 PM
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-tea-party-is-not-the-problem-the-establishment-is/#.UQ8H9i1Wta8.redditHere comes the internal battle that destroys the party.
2/4/2013 7:48:18 AM
It's gonna be interesting, for sure. Perhaps not Karl Rove, but certainly many of his big donors sowed the seeds of the Tea Party by either financing or, at best, cheerleading. They didn't realize they were going to reap slack-jawed dolts standing in front of microphones that broadcast all over the nation. They thought they could control it and to some degree they did - this is just the latest attempt of them dropping cash to keep their power (spend money to make money). The problem is the big donors in the Republican party have a credibility issue of their own. They have produced two candidates, both of which the teahadists were kinda lukewarm toward, and neither could defeat the antichrist that is Obama - literally the most dangerous president in the history of the world.The tea party has lost some momentum, but a significant number of them will stay the course which makes the GOP splintering, I know you are praying for, a very real possibility. While we sit back and enjoy the show I can't help but start thinking of how democrats treat the "grassroots" parts of their party.
2/4/2013 9:16:13 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/04/conservative-victory-project_n_2616240.html?utm_hp_ref=politicsKarl Rove gears up to destroy Tea Party.Karl has said nutty things himself in the past few years, but I don't doubt his strategic prowess to shift the landscape.
2/4/2013 2:05:16 PM
Senator McCain credibility watch -1000https://twitter.com/SenJohnMcCain/status/298456316538662912
2/4/2013 2:32:51 PM
^ meh
2/4/2013 4:31:12 PM
A lot of the mega-rich donors are ultra-right wing though. So not only is Rove going to have to spend even more money on primaries to fend off the unelectable candidates, but he's going to have to do it with less money and against opponents who are pretty well off. The Republicans have truly ushered in their own demise.As for the future, I speculate the Democrats will enjoy about 10 years of dominance while a new conservative party organizes, probably the Libertarians. After that long the Democrats will probably have been bought out by corporate interests and they'll have to reform into a populist socialist party of some sort. Setting up any opposition to them depends on the Religious Right falling into total political obscurity though, which is already beginning to happen. No matter what happens though, the country is going to experience a much-needed liberal shift in policy.
2/4/2013 4:56:38 PM