User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » Django Unchained (Tarantino's next film) Page 1 2 3 [4] 5, Prev Next  
EuroTitToss
All American
4790 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ YEA I LEARNED THAT FROM EMINEM IN 8 MILE.

1/4/2013 11:07:01 AM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

As a Tarantino fan, I can safely say this is much worse than even Jackie Brown.
This is officially his worst movie and one that shouldn't have been made.
I don't know what made Tarantino movies great in the 90's but whatever it is doesn't exist anymore.

For shows like Seinfeld it was Larry David not Seinfeld.
Maybe Tarantino had a sidekick we didn't know about.

1/5/2013 7:12:22 AM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

lol

1/5/2013 12:01:11 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

In all seriousness, there's no doubt in my mind that this movie would've been significantly better had Sally Menke edited it.

1/5/2013 12:18:51 PM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"vinylbandit

In all seriousness..."


I hope you're not implying that I wasn't being serious.

1/5/2013 4:12:50 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYYBJ8XRdh4

Samuel Jackson teases a fox news reported for not saying n-word. brings the lols if not posted already.

1/6/2013 11:08:39 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

The scene with Ben's skull was a trip back to my childhood. I have heard that logic many many times from racist old men, and leo just brought it to life. some crazy shit.

At one level this was the same story/plot as IB, but the two seem more connected like it is part of a series or something.

[Edited on January 7, 2013 at 1:37 AM. Reason : dp]

1/7/2013 1:35:46 AM

moron
All American
34142 Posts
user info
edit post

^ huh? You know living people that believed that??

1/7/2013 1:40:01 AM

ajohnson1
All American
1527 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"As a Tarantino fan, I can safely say this is much worse than even Jackie Brown.
This is officially his worst movie and one that shouldn't have been made."


there is nothing official about that statement. but your opinion is noted.

imo, pulp fiction > reservoir dogs > basterds > kill bill > django >>>>> jackie brown > death proof

1/7/2013 9:11:54 AM

Money_Jones
Ohhh Farts
12521 Posts
user info
edit post

^i pretty much agree with that ranking, might put kill bill=Django

1/7/2013 10:47:01 AM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

I think that if you are going to group the Kill Bills that basterds and Django should be grouped. QT has stated that they belong together and that he one day hopes to make a third movie where the "victimisers become the victoms".

Jackie Brown was a great film, just a very unQT type film. Also death proof was a great film, but more of a short story.

1/7/2013 1:14:05 PM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

death proof was great. i don't know what's wrong with y'all.

1/7/2013 6:45:24 PM

Pupils DiL8t
All American
4960 Posts
user info
edit post

I would most likely separate Kill Bill into two parts when ranking Tarantino's films.

I don't know why, but I think I would rank Jackie Brown on par with Pulp Fiction; it's one of my favorites, but I find it difficult to not enjoy any of his films.

Also, I would consider Four Rooms's chapter "Penthouse - 'The Man from Hollywood'" more of a short story than Death Proof; Wikipedia lists Death Proof as having a running time of 114 minutes.

1/7/2013 7:03:48 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

That's the inferior DVD cut, though.

The release version was much shorter, something like 85 minutes.

1/7/2013 8:26:56 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

Wiki strikes again

1/7/2013 9:07:39 PM

Pupils DiL8t
All American
4960 Posts
user info
edit post

^^
What was in those additional 29 minutes that made it so inferior? Just pointless dialogue?

1/7/2013 9:52:14 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

There's a really long scene that establishes how focused Stuntman Mike is on the second group of girls, but it really only serves to make him a weirdo instead of a cool movie madman.

There's also some extra stuff in the bar with the first group, including the full lap dance scene. It's entertaining enough (especially since it's set to "Down in Mexico"), but it's not as entertaining as imagining what the scene is like in the "SCENE MISSING" version.

The long version isn't bad, but it drags quite a bit and feels like even more than the extra half hour it is.

1/8/2013 1:57:09 AM

lafta
All American
14880 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"pulp fiction > reservoir dogs > basterds > kill bill > django >>>>> jackie brown > death proof"


This i can live with,
I just cant believe some people who said this the best movie they've ever seen
also why it was nominated for best picture is beyond me

1/11/2013 2:17:49 PM

ShinAntonio
Zinc Saucier
18947 Posts
user info
edit post

It's a good movie, but too damn violent for me. I could go my whole life without seeing that dude get ripped apart by dogs again. Otherwise I enjoyed the humor and characters.

I don't get all the hate for Tarantino as an actor. I'm not saying he's fantastic or anything, but if we didn't know it was him I doubt his cameos would elicit all the criticism.

1/12/2013 5:00:31 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

did he have a cameo in basterds?

1/13/2013 10:35:12 AM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

He's one of the dead Nazis in the first scene with the Basterds.

1/13/2013 12:09:35 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148439 Posts
user info
edit post

1/13/2013 8:44:50 PM

BiggzsIII
All American
5016 Posts
user info
edit post

Saw the movie last night, and I enjoyed it. The audience I was with a very mixed crowd age wise and race wise and the overall thought was that we all enjoyed it a lot and thought it was a very good movie worthy of the commercial success.

As for: The scene with Ben's skull was a trip back to my childhood. I have heard that logic many many times from racist old men, and leo just brought it to life. some crazy shit.

I too have heard this from many older (I would assume racist persons).

Very glad the movie got nominated for awards, and I plan on seeing it again.


III

1/13/2013 9:15:36 PM

EuroTitToss
All American
4790 Posts
user info
edit post

Damn, where are ya'll from that you heard this shit in childhood?

1/13/2013 9:17:58 PM

ssclark
Black and Proud
14179 Posts
user info
edit post

Most of the people here have parents born in the 50s and 60s and grand parents born in thr 30s and 40s .... Hrll my great grandma was born in 1909 and died when i was 15... Lets not act like racisim wasnt an inssue in the US in the 20th century

1/13/2013 10:19:27 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

Could some of these TWW gun enthusiasts make themselves useful and go through the fact/fiction with the guns in this movie? I am calling you all out.

I participated in civil war reenactments when I was a kid and all infantry men had muskets. Pistols and Henry Rifles were used but very uncommon. They tried to keep it as accurate as possible. I am not sure if Hans's rifle that he was using was a Henry or not, so I am gonna look into it.

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Django_Unchained

Welp, that was easy. I was right on the Henry and muskets.




[Edited on January 13, 2013 at 11:59 PM. Reason : s]

1/13/2013 11:44:14 PM

BiggzsIII
All American
5016 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Damn, where are ya'll from that you heard this shit in childhood?"


Statesville, NC (Iredell County)...you be amazed what people around here have said in my youth (and now a days)


III

1/13/2013 11:46:45 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

For me it was big bad Badin, and also when I lived in Fl. I have heard this several times.

1/13/2013 11:53:30 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Most of the people here have parents born in the 50s and 60s and grand parents born in thr 30s and 40s .... Hrll my great grandma was born in 1909 and died when i was 15... Lets not act like racisim wasnt an inssue in the US in the 20th century"

my great grandfather was born in the 1850's

1/14/2013 5:55:17 AM

ssclark
Black and Proud
14179 Posts
user info
edit post

Mom 1960.

Gma 1935

Great grandma 1909

1/14/2013 9:05:52 AM

jbrick83
All American
23447 Posts
user info
edit post

What was the "logic" from the skull scene you guys keep bringing up?

1/14/2013 10:50:04 AM

BiggzsIII
All American
5016 Posts
user info
edit post

Logic: That Africans had nodges in their brain/skull that made them more apt to be subservient and obedient to "Masters" and not try to resist or over take said masters.

Not exactly word for word from the movies, but that was the basis I always heard (along with several other BS tales)


III

1/14/2013 11:02:16 AM

ssclark
Black and Proud
14179 Posts
user info
edit post

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrenology

1/14/2013 11:14:42 AM

nOOb
All American
1973 Posts
user info
edit post

I enjoyed that album.

1/14/2013 11:20:54 AM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

i first learned about Phrenology in "Philosophy of Science" with Austin... everybody's favorite philosophy course.

1/14/2013 4:21:59 PM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

There is a DVD release of this floating around on the internet. I got mine today.

1/17/2013 5:58:54 PM

vinylbandit
All American
48079 Posts
user info
edit post

Oscar voter BanjoMan

1/17/2013 6:37:21 PM

rwbrantl
Veteran
279 Posts
user info
edit post

Jackie Brown is a fucking awesome movie.

1/18/2013 9:18:01 AM

BanjoMan
All American
9609 Posts
user info
edit post

Yes, very good. I love it. Is it pure blacksploitation?

1/18/2013 6:57:31 PM

wilso
All American
14657 Posts
user info
edit post

1/18/2013 9:59:03 PM

Klatypus
All American
6786 Posts
user info
edit post

lol^

^^I was under the impression it was making fun of blacksploitation

1/19/2013 11:09:50 AM

rjrumfel
All American
23027 Posts
user info
edit post

I didn't like it. Overdone with the blood, didn't seem realistic at all.

Or course it was a Tarantino film.

Also, the hood scene was an obvious reference to the klan, but they didn't turn up until after the Civil War.

[Edited on April 20, 2013 at 1:51 AM. Reason : sda]

4/20/2013 1:44:33 AM

LudaChris
All American
7946 Posts
user info
edit post

^Dynamite wasn't invented in Germany until 1867(movie set in 1858) either, but it's not suppose to be a history movie, just a fun movie.

The "Klan" scene had me rolling, thought it was great. When they were riding in I was thinking "I bet it's hard to ride and see through those little eye holes with the hoods moving around" haha.

4/20/2013 8:47:09 AM

ncstatetke
All American
41128 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"the Cobra “Big Bore” Derringer – didn’t exist in such a form until the 1980s. The Sharps Cavarly Carbine was first produced in 1874, whilst the Henry 1860 – well, you can guess what year that weapon first emerged (it’s in the name)."


http://whatculture.com/film/7-historical-inaccuracies-in-django-unchained.php/2

4/20/2013 8:54:58 AM

duro982
All American
3088 Posts
user info
edit post

^ Tarantino has actually referred to Django and Inglorious as "altered history." He's talked about wanting to do a third to make it a theme based trilogy. I guess similar to the man with no name trilogy, revenge trilogy (korean), etc.


Quote :
"Also, the hood scene was an obvious reference to the klan, but they didn't turn up until after the Civil War."


I thought that was actually the point. And particularly why they were going on about how they needed to be redesigned. They were the pre-cursor of the hoods the klan is known to wear, and the group was sort of the pre-cursor to the klan itself. It was sort of an "origin" and it works fine when you realize that just because a movie takes place in the past it doesn't make it a historical movie. And that it's Tarantino and you've seen other Tarantino movies, especially Inglorious Bastards which is most similar to this and equally inaccurate historically.


Quote :
"Overdone with the blood, didn't seem realistic at all."


If you go into a Tarantino movie and expect realistic violence and blood (especially post Kill Bill and Inglorious Basterds), you're going to have a bad time.

[Edited on April 20, 2013 at 10:15 AM. Reason : .]

4/20/2013 10:13:40 AM

ViolentMAW
All American
4127 Posts
user info
edit post

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOXP4dqDV3U

4/20/2013 12:08:21 PM

BridgetSPK
#1 Sir Purr Fan
31378 Posts
user info
edit post

I just saw it. I thought it was highly entertaining, which is what it was supposed to be, right?

4/20/2013 6:50:30 PM

Smath74
All American
93278 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Inglorious Bastards which is most similar to this and equally inaccurate historically."

wait... Hitler WASN'T killed in a french movie theater???

4/20/2013 7:49:32 PM

Bill Bixby
All American
517 Posts
user info
edit post

Exactly.

4/21/2013 12:27:26 AM

Cherokee
All American
8264 Posts
user info
edit post

I really enjoyed Inglorious Basterds. I'm not a Tarantino aficionado or anything, why do so many people dislike it? I thought the dialogue was awesome, the tension was built extremely well with each scene and the cinematography was great. And the villain absolutely stole the show.

4/23/2013 9:59:28 PM

 Message Boards » Entertainment » Django Unchained (Tarantino's next film) Page 1 2 3 [4] 5, Prev Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.