Voting fraud against Ron Paul Victory in North Dakota


http://youtu.be/Myh5VdVpX9g

3/7/2012 10:39:42 PM

The only Caucus read aloud and is a landslide for Ron Paul.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btN5cCoTOpM&feature=youtu.be

[Edited on March 7, 2012 at 10:41 PM. Reason : nevada]

3/7/2012 10:41:11 PM

Paul's performance was well in line with polling expectations, but hey maybe those were rigged too. All of them. Except the ones on the internet with no IP caching.

He depends on voters aged 18-28, literally the most unreliable voting bloc in existence when it comes to turnout.

His rallies are large but that's largely owed to the convenient fact that you can attend rallies in states other than your own.

Seriously, it's just getting sad and pathetic now. Paul isn't getting robbed, he never had much in his pocket to begin with. His fans are so caught up in the insular world they made for themselves on the internet they really can't fathom that he's not so popular outside their forums. Now they're going full-on Alex Jones to try and explain how reality isn't matching up with their delusions.

3/8/2012 9:29:06 AM

...says the man who turns a blind eye to the evidence of corruption in at least 10 states so far including New Hampshire, Maine, Nevada, Iowa, Georgia, South Carolina, Florida, North Dakota, Alaska, Arizona.

Quote :

"Paul's performance was well in line with polling expectations, but hey maybe those were rigged too. All of them. Except the ones on the internet with no IP caching. "

The people who run the polls and the people who run the exit polls are the same people.

I call it the hoarder syndrome. How naive can you be when the shit is piled up around you and you can't see it? It's right there in front of you! Everywhere around you!

At what point do you give up and say "fine, you're right. I guess I am a hoarder."

"There is "rat feces" everywhere, the country smells like shit and is falling apart, nobody is happy, our liberty is being walked all over" but somehow you like to live in the shit hole!

[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 11:50 AM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 11:49:39 AM

Quote :

"The people who run the polls and the people who run the exit polls are the same people. "

I'm talking about these polls, dipshit: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html

Are you telling me that Gallup, PPP, Rasmussen, Fox, NBC, WSJ, Pew Research, AP, McClatchy, Quinnipiak, Bloomberg, CBS, USA Today, and the rest are all part of one conspiracy?

[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 11:54 AM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 11:53:34 AM

Are they connected to mainstream media? I can't tell. I need some help.

[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 11:55 AM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 11:55:04 AM

Mainstream Media: noun - Every source of information that is not dailypaul.com

3/8/2012 11:58:13 AM

Quote :

"Mainstream Media: noun - Every source of information that is not dailypaul.com"

Seriously, where are you supposed to research if you can't trust officials reporting of facts? what resources do you use?

You know hypothetically, what IF the news being broadcasted is wrong? How do you convince a stranger that the news is wrong?


[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 12:29 PM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 12:07:55 PM

dude's got to be trolling at this point

3/8/2012 12:11:11 PM

fine, if you're going to go take this into trolling territory and laugh, I'll just continue posting evidence so that other people to make up their mind.

I can't help the mindless.

3/8/2012 12:14:07 PM

It's one thing to believe this news outlet has X agenda, and this news outlet has Y agenda. It's another thing to believe that 2 dozen news outlets and polling organizations share the exact same agenda, are all colluding in a grand conspiracy against a fringe candidate. I don't singularly trust a single one of those pollsters, but taking all of them as a group it's a little hard to believe Paul is actually, secretly polling well above Romney and Santorum but every news organization is engaged in a conspiracy to hide that.

I mean, honestly, can you think of a grander conspiracy theory than that? How could it actually become less plausible short of Paul being a reptilian?

Quote :

"I'll just continue posting evidence so that other people to make up their mind."

A picture of a rally is not evidence of anything except that Paul fans don't mind roadtrips to multiple states.

[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 1:45:59 PM

Carol Paul: Election fraud confirmed


Carol Paul breaks her silence and tells a WTPN activist that half of Ron Paul’s votes are being thrown away during a post-AZ GOP debate viewing party appearance backstage.

The normally very quiet, Carol Paul, wife of Republican GOP candidate, Dr. Ron Paul, was seen here on tape blaming election fraud as the culprit behind some of Ron Paul’s caucus losses in the 2012 race for the Republican nomination.

After last week’s Presidential debate, an activist for the “We the People Network” found a way through security to make it backstage, just prior to a scheduled speech Ron Paul was due to make at the New Life Bible Church in Mesa, AZ, minutes after the final GOP debate on Wednesday, Feb. 22.

Little did the activist know that simply finding a way to talk with Mr. and Mrs. Paul backstage would turn into such a potentially huge story, with Mrs. Paul coming forward, without being prompted, to explain her thoughts on the final results of some of the caucuses that have taken place during the campaign season.



http://www.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/carol-paul-election-fraud-confirmed

[Edited on March 8, 2012 at 7:40 PM. Reason : .]

3/8/2012 7:39:54 PM

“They said, well, they just wrote them on paper, and they can’t recount them, so they just threw them out.” - carol paul

3/8/2012 9:53:22 PM

poor guy if true, but had you rather him get elected and then killed?

let the nice old man retire in comfort.

3/8/2012 10:26:18 PM

Attn: Jesus

[Edited on March 9, 2012 at 4:04 PM. Reason : .]

3/9/2012 4:04:23 PM

Quote :

"poor guy if true, but had you rather him get elected and then killed?"

Ron Paul has a couple decades left to live, max. If we keep going in this direction, it's not poor Ron Paul...it's poor us. We will be left to clean up this shit.

[Edited on March 9, 2012 at 4:07 PM. Reason : ]

3/9/2012 4:07:06 PM

3/9/2012 10:03:48 PM

Nevada vote fraud official



As if anyone who’s been paying attention over the last few weeks is actually surprised, another caucus state is taken down by GOP officials, permanently altering the outcome of yet another election, rendering its results forever in question.

This time, however, the people of Nevada are the immediate victims of mounting state GOP scandals, as the historical “First in the West” Nevada Caucus has been officially rendered a fraud, and the unwitting citizens and voters are once again left holding the bag.

So far, the overall magnitude of the circumstances has gone largely unnoticed by the people of the US in general, but that didn’t deter NV GOP Chairwoman, Amy Tarkanian from filing her resignation the very next morning on Sunday, as obvious and rampant, widespread election fraud is sweeping through the country in an establishment elite attempt to hide the real results, in favor of a pre-chosen candidate, despite the wishes of the American people.

Very similar to the circumstances that played out in Iowa just weeks ago, also forcing a state GOP official there to recently submit his own resignation, precincts across the state of Nevada are now coming up with mismatching numbers, missing votes, and ultimately and permanently unverifiable results, rendering the entire United States 2012 election process a total failure and, so far, unrecoverable.

After almost every Caucus thus far, the election has to be ultimately rendered meaningless. with the only real solutions being independent Grand Jury investigations, total do-overs, or simply allow the establishment and it’s minions to steal the nomination away from the people and the candidate they are actually trying to choose, and simply give it to Mitt Romney instead.


http://m.examiner.com/conspiracy-in-denver/nevada-vote-fraud-official?cid=PROD-redesign-right-next

3/9/2012 11:08:20 PM

Why are you using Examiner.com as a source? It is a news blog aggregate, and this particular blog is written by a guy who almost exclusively posts about Ron Paul and only posts about conspiracies in general.

[Edited on March 9, 2012 at 11:57 PM. Reason : .]

3/9/2012 11:50:58 PM

Quote :

"Attn: Jesus"

Fucking Christ, dude. Come off it, already.

Your cell-phone pics of modest to medium sized crowds are not impressing anybody.

Here's a rule of thumb for you about photography. If you can make out the brand of jeans the person is wearing in the pictures foreground, then you aren't going to get a shot that shows a huge crowd. I can literally make out the bald spot on Paul's head in every picture you post.

3/10/2012 2:47:07 AM

Aww. Don't get mad. I'm just plotting another point in the timeline so you won't miss how an audience can turn from a crowded room in a pavilion to a crowded public park with hundreds of thousands.



Keep your eye on the ball. If you can't see the growth from the last time I posted, I know you are lying.

3/10/2012 4:08:13 AM

Quote :

"Why are you using Examiner.com as a source? It is a news blog aggregate, and this particular blog is written by a guy who almost exclusively posts about Ron Paul and only posts about conspiracies in general."

Pro-Ron Paul sources are the only ones that can be trusted, all others are MSM

3/10/2012 12:03:53 PM

I am now convinced that Ron Paul will be the nominee.

3/10/2012 12:05:06 PM

Now you're learning

3/10/2012 12:28:00 PM

3/10/2012 1:04:53 PM

Why is the 10th amendment there? Everyone knows that shit doesn't count anymore.

3/10/2012 1:26:39 PM

Nor the Second Amendment.

3/10/2012 1:29:12 PM

updated 16 minutes ago

WASHINGTON — Rick Santorum has overwhelmingly won the Kansas Republican presidential caucuses.
----------------------------------
By Rachel Rose Hartman | The Ticket – 1 hr 54 mins ago


Rick Santorum has won the Republican presidential caucuses in Kansas.

Santorum holds an overwhelming lead with 61 percents of the precincts reporting, capturing 53 percent of the vote--only about 7,700 people--so far. Mitt Romney is in second with 17 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich with 16 percent and Ron Paul with 13 percent. If his large lead holds up, Santorum stands to gain a substantial number of Kansas' 40 delegates.



[Edited on March 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM. Reason : .]

3/10/2012 3:41:42 PM

another lawrence, ks shot

3/10/2012 5:02:40 PM

Mitt Romney: 1,522,033 likes this
Ron Paul: 902,980 like this
Rick Santorum: 173,538 like this
Newt Gingrich: 294,691 like this


Winning a lot of elections for being the least liked.






2,500 turn out at our St. Charles County Town Hall in Missouri today.

3/10/2012 5:12:03 PM

Do you really think Facebook likes are a good barometer for how people are going to vote?

3/10/2012 5:36:03 PM

Yes. Do you really think it doesn't?

3/10/2012 6:02:52 PM

Yes, I don't believe that because Santorum has the least amount of Facebook likes means he shouldn't be winning primaries.

3/10/2012 9:38:25 PM

I'm guessing you haven't taken probability and statistics.

Quote :

" Mitt Romney: 1,522,033 likes this Ron Paul: 902,980 like this Rick Santorum: 173,538 like this Newt Gingrich: 294,691 like this "

There are 2,893,242 total "likes" among all the candidates.

Most polls only poll 3-10 thousand people, yet we have a sample size 1,000 times bigger.

Unknown variable?: how many people have duplicate likes across two candidates?
Unknown variable?: how many people have duplicate accounts liking the same candidate twice?
Educated guess: 1 in every 50 people have duplicate likes or accounts which skews the numbers.

I've been tracking 'likes' since 12/4/11 here http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=621268

If you plot data on a graph, you'll see that the increase is almost linear. We can conclude manipulation of the numbers are minimal and negligent.

All candidates have equal probability of being skewed or liked by the 2.7 MILLION other "likes" that exist, yet santorum was the least skewed and followed legitimately for a reason.

Can you please explain this?



[Edited on March 10, 2012 at 10:03 PM. Reason : .]

3/10/2012 9:59:47 PM

How many are voting age, how many intend to vote, what percentage of the voting population is covered by fb, how many liked more than one person, so many unknowns....

3/10/2012 10:07:00 PM

Quote :

"How many are voting age, how many intend to vote, what percentage of the voting population is covered by fb, how many liked more than one person, so many unknowns..."

Arbitrary because all candidates have equal chance to obtain likes by any voting age, intent to vote, and covers the same voting population.

3/10/2012 10:16:08 PM

You're average rank and file republican isn't on facebook, because they're too busy watching Jay Leno and cutting out coupons.

[Edited on March 10, 2012 at 10:21 PM. Reason : ]

3/10/2012 10:19:35 PM

^^ and yet, we know that the vast majority of RP's supporters are young. We know that most young people are tech savvy and most older people aren't tech savvy. Less tech savvy means, among other things, less likely to use Facebook. Now, can you see how such a thing might have an effect on the number of "Likes" a candidate has?

3/10/2012 10:25:04 PM

Quote :

"You're average rank and file republican isn't on facebook, because they're too busy watching Jay Leno and cutting out coupons."

Everyone with a computer is on facebook.

My whole family is on facebook.

All my friends are on facebook.

90% of my customers are on facebook, all ages. all races. all classes.

3/10/2012 10:27:43 PM

I'm not. And most of my family isn't, either. But, carry on with your scientific data sampling of facebook likes and cell phone pics.

[Edited on March 10, 2012 at 10:48 PM. Reason : ]

3/10/2012 10:44:42 PM

I'm hearing from underground sources that Ron Paul won Virgin Island

Paul: 29%

Romney: 26%

Santorum: 6%

Gingrich: 5%


but....Mainstream Media is reporting this:

Quote :

"Romney wins Virgin Islands GOP Caucus Associated PressAssociated Press – 2 hrs 9 mins ago ST. THOMAS, U.S. Virgin Islands (AP) — The Republican Party chairman in the U.S. Virgin Islands says Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney has won the territory's GOP caucus. Chairman Herb Schoenbohm says Romney can count on seven delegates from the Virgin Islands. He already had three superdelegates before Saturday's caucuses and he picked up three more in voting in St. Thomas and St. Croix. After the vote, an uncommitted delegate switched to Romney. Ron Paul got one delegate, and one delegate remains uncommitted. Residents of the U.S. Virgin Islands can participate in primaries but like residents of nearby Puerto Rico cannot vote in the general election."

You decide.

Underground information

Quote :

" Submitted by GCN3030 on Sat, 03/10/2012 - 23:10. The total delegates reported on the Virgin Islands GOP website must be wrong because they list 6 delegates for Ron Paul: The delegate count for Ron Paul at the bottom must be wrong since there are 6 delegates listed as Paul supporters: Robert Max Schanfarber 29 (11 STX, 18 STT) Paul Joshua A . Schanfarber 21 (5 STX, 16 STT)Paul Geoffrey Wolfe 18 (5 STX, 13 STT) Paul Roseann Wells 15 (2 STX, 13 STT) Paul Michael Wilson 15 (2 STX, 13 STT) Paul Eddie Jane Simmons 14 (1 STX, 13 STT) Paul — http://vigop.com/ "

[Edited on March 11, 2012 at 12:19 AM. Reason : .]

3/11/2012 12:00:08 AM

CNN not releasing Virgin Island numbers. Claims Romney win

http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/vi







[Edited on March 11, 2012 at 2:08 PM. Reason : .]

3/11/2012 2:04:55 PM

If Ron Paul has so much support around the nation (which you keep claiming) and keeps getting screwed by the Republican party in their primaries why doesn't he just make an independant bid and beat both Obama and the Republican nominee in the real election?

3/11/2012 3:20:23 PM

Geniusboy should change his name to selection bias boy.

3/11/2012 3:28:36 PM

starting to sound more like salisburyboy if you ask me

3/11/2012 3:32:44 PM

Quote :

"If Ron Paul has so much support around the nation (which you keep claiming) and keeps getting screwed by the Republican party in their primaries why doesn't he just make an independent bid and beat both Obama and the Republican nominee in the real election?"

He ran as Republican in 2008 and was blackballed by the media and dubbed as an unelectable candidate. That's because everyone knows [used as a fact, not speculation] that independents will never win.



When you step back and think about it, parties shouldn't shape and influence the politician, politicians should influence and shape the party. Ron Paul is Ron Paul no matter what party name he's running under.

In 2008, the majority of the nation still had trust in the media to report honest stories. The majority of population were aware their votes didn't count ("I'm not voting because my vote doesn't count") The suspicions were there, but again how do you prove it?

What's happened since 2008?

Bailouts for the rich
No tax increase on the rich. (Middle Class pays 33% of their paycheck, Upper Class only pays 13%)
Inflation
Quantitative Easing
NDAA, SOPA, H.R. 347 (Assaults on the last remaining sections of the constitution)

What has formed because of the assault of freedom:

Wikileaks
Occupy Wall Street
Ron Paul

Groups with an agenda, and no other agenda, that expose the truth and lies of politicians for the gain of society.




Americans are tired of these fabricated candidates. The government has been playing the American people for years. We flip flop to democrat president to republican president and back again and each time the American people are told what they want to hear, and then we're stabbed in the back after they're sworn in.


For the first time, the candidates are just dumb enough to expose themselves as puppets.

Then you have Ron Paul. Ron Paul is on record for having the same message... FREEDOM! LIBERTY! and the CONSTITUTION!

Please don't take my word for it.

Prove me wrong.



[Edited on March 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM. Reason : He did, mistergreen]

3/11/2012 4:06:43 PM

i thought ron paul ran as a republican in 2008.

3/11/2012 4:16:16 PM

You're right, he ran as Libertarian in 1988. My bad.

3/11/2012 4:30:33 PM

Black Americans support for Ron Paul


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Zd_uQx9ulSY#!

3/12/2012 2:50:07 AM

Does that video convince you that a majority of black voters would vote for Ron Paul?

3/12/2012 10:17:31 AM