Is this a Young Turks nerd??[Edited on October 10, 2019 at 9:55 PM. Reason : Yep. ]
10/10/2019 9:54:45 PM
He’s an Assadist, too.And fwiw, I had no idea he was a comedian. He basically just rails on the establishment non-stop which is fine, but also is neck deep in disinformation.** also, lol at giving one fuck about Ellen and posting about her in a thread criticizing the Democrats. She and GWB both suck. What does that have to do with Democrats? Did I somehow stumble into Glenn Greenwald’s twitter feed on TWW?[Edited on October 11, 2019 at 7:40 AM. Reason : C]
10/11/2019 7:37:52 AM
Change in effective tax rate since 1962We essentially have a flat tax now in our country[Edited on October 11, 2019 at 7:58 PM. Reason : ]
10/11/2019 7:57:42 PM
good, except that we need to get the top .01% and above up to where the top .1% is, which I've been saying forever.
10/11/2019 10:35:46 PM
Lets leave the red lines where they are and put gray or black lines back where they used to be
10/11/2019 11:13:04 PM
10/11/2019 11:50:38 PM
I could be okay with this tax structure if we had a progressive federal property tax of sorts.
10/12/2019 12:43:32 AM
10/12/2019 1:16:36 AM
^
10/13/2019 4:42:55 PM
Every single democrat voted for the resolution against withdrawal from Syria. You are officially the party of war.
10/16/2019 6:28:00 PM
^god you’re a dumbass
10/16/2019 7:18:16 PM
HELL YEAH WE’RE THE PARTY OF WARBACK TO BACK WORLD WAR CHAMPS UNDER DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTS!!!!1
10/16/2019 7:19:31 PM
I wonder how the green party members of congress voted
10/16/2019 7:22:40 PM
The real irony is that they are all voting for a resolution condemning the president's refusal to continue to circumvent the law while simultaneously pursuing impeachment of said president. That circumvention of the law is in regards to fighting ISIS indefinitely in Syria without ever voting for an AUMF or declaration of war. Also ironically, they won't vote on impeachment articles. So is the law and procedure laid out by the constitution important or not? Its hard to keep up at this point.
10/16/2019 8:06:50 PM
What is happening? https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/schumer-democrats-overturn-tax-deduction-cap-66442477The world is turned upside down.
10/22/2019 1:48:50 PM
Lhttps://twitter.com/whitehouse/status/1186707420602601472?s=21Why would this admin have even a 5th grade level understanding of statistics.
10/23/2019 9:36:36 AM
AOC is fuckin’ greathttp://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/1187088925719969793Zuckerberg is the opposite of fuckin’ great
10/23/2019 4:06:48 PM
Such an own goal for some of these goober :cough:Biden:cough: to get on Trump about lynching then have to stammer and stutter when it turns out the idiots said the same thing about Bill Clinton. Do some self-OPPO research! Then it's worse when they try to say "oh yea sorry but his is worse for some reason." Just say "I fucked up and it's bad in both situations"
10/23/2019 4:44:10 PM
Are threesoms credible or no?
10/24/2019 12:23:36 PM
^^^How about when Al Green asked how Zuk doesn't know the race and sexual preferences of the CEOs for the 21 organizations.https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1187033479395061761Almost as good as Maxine Waters telling Zuck that standing for free speech is above the law.https://twitter.com/YahooFinance/status/1187011255917150208But easily the best was Posey (R) asking Zuck if he thought vaccines were harmful. (I came for the grandstanding, but staid to watch Zuck laugh at a congressman.https://twitter.com/jonsarlin/status/1187027878564782081
10/24/2019 3:37:01 PM
10/27/2019 11:54:42 PM
10/28/2019 12:54:50 AM
i'm not sure if open testimony is the right decision yet (maybe, not sure) since the closed door testimony was working so well, but are democrats going to at least have an attorney do the questioning?
11/6/2019 6:10:15 PM
Schumer praised Peter King today. (not the Iowa racist King, the NY racist King)
11/11/2019 4:01:16 PM
https://twitter.com/politico/status/1197114895390646272?s=21JFC.Shame Matt Jones didn’t jump in on this a lot earlier. He would at least put some tepid pressure on Mitch.
11/20/2019 8:50:51 AM
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/471723-independents-souring-on-impeachment-underscores-risk-for-democrats
11/26/2019 2:37:16 AM
democrats have not had a cogent media strategy (or seemingly any kind of coordinated strategy at all) to go along with the impeachment inquiry and that's a very dangerous failurethe media will not report this fairly on their own, democrats have to be pushing the media every single day
11/26/2019 8:56:29 AM
I enjoyed both of these clips.https://twitter.com/LisPower1/status/1199343847370674176
11/26/2019 1:27:50 PM
If you need a coordinated media strategy to sell an impeachment offense, then its not an impeachable offense.
11/27/2019 1:30:11 AM
Top notch legal analysis, lol
11/27/2019 7:33:13 AM
Not only that but it’s so insanely hypocritical for the guy who is OBSESSED with the media manipulating people to all of a sudden say “lol, media doesn’t matter” if you have the goods.
11/27/2019 8:02:57 AM
I think you missed misunderstood my post unless you believe media has convinced everyone Trump should NOT be impeached. My point is that the impeachment (and removal) is reserved for the president doing something so egregious that we cannot even let him go on with his term. This isn't an election its more like a criminal court. Its a high bar and I feel like needing to convince someone about it tells you that it wasn't so obviously egregious. It needs to be egregious without doubt. Simply "doing bad thing" is not necessarily impeachable and the public will decide if it was bad enough in November. Of course the media can and does manipulate people. Do you think the MSM (aside from fox) hasn't been pro-impeachment? Maddow, Cuomo, Tapper, Lemon etc have been doing "here's why this is so bad" explanations the whole time. You know I know because I keep them on everyday. I've always said if something is so bad you wouldn't need to say "heres why this is so bad"[Edited on November 27, 2019 at 1:25 PM. Reason : the real problem is they chose to impeach him on the least bad bad thing he's done]
11/27/2019 1:24:12 PM
https://constitutionus.com/
11/27/2019 1:32:56 PM
a president can only be impeached if he commits a crime earl understands.like shitting in someones unwilling mouth.
12/4/2019 7:37:54 PM
I didn't say that. I said its 'like' a criminal court. it doesn't have to be a crime but it still needs to be "so egregious we can't let him finish out his term" and it needs to be proven to the degree of a conviction. Its much more than "did a bad thing". And just to be clear, I think Trump has committed impeachable offenses, the democrats just aren't using them to impeach him. Probably because they too would be implicated in the high crimes Trump is guilty of. We are actively running concentration camps and impeaching the president over a slick phone call. What kind of message does that send? That is part of why Pelosi has no credibility. Oh, and she doesn't hate the president, she simply thinks he's trying to destroy the country for personal gain. Don't mess with her.https://twitter.com/thesavionwright/status/1202788686292758530[Edited on December 5, 2019 at 11:26 PM. Reason : added a tweet for that one kid who hates tweets]
12/5/2019 11:10:54 PM
12/6/2019 7:58:27 AM
fucking seriously? hand trump a win right now for a deal people don't even like?https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-09/pelosi-white-house-near-handshake-deal-on-new-nafta-agreement
12/9/2019 4:01:35 PM
Lol, such utter stupidity.“Donald, please take this huge win and show the country that you can rise above this impeachment nonsense and govern.” - NancyHow can she possibly think she will get any credit whatsoever from any “swing” voter on this. JFC.At least give people like Bernie and Warren a chance to campaign on more labor protection in a renegotiated deal 15 months from now.
12/10/2019 12:06:50 AM
They're having back to back press conferences for impeachment and trumps trade dealThis is insane
12/10/2019 8:27:35 AM
Gotta please that business daddy.But maybe not... Fox will hype the trade deal, but it will be swallowed by the impeachment news tonight. This move could deny a lot of the weight of that win for the administration.[Edited on December 10, 2019 at 10:31 AM. Reason : ]
12/10/2019 10:11:19 AM
Hahahaha, and Republicans are attacking Pelosi for taking so long on USMCAFucking shit show
12/10/2019 11:57:51 AM
https://thehill.com/homenews/news/474204-democrats-worried-by-jeremy-corbyns-uk-rise-amid-anti-semitismWorthless assholes. I'm surprised they haven't tried to pull this with Bernie even though he's Jewish.
12/12/2019 1:01:02 PM
If this impeachment thing was serious, they wouldn't send it to the senate to die and would wait until they win the senate. They would just keep it in the house and keep investigating through the election.
12/12/2019 8:58:56 PM
Doesn’t make sense to impeach a president in congress after he’s out of office. Trump is facing criminal charges when he leaves office but there’s a concern of statute of limitations and pardons if he gets re-elected. Voting trump out now subjects him to criminal prosecution. I think this is annoyingly why they kept the articles of impeachment to two constitutional issues... it doesn’t interfere with the criminal process.
12/12/2019 11:22:17 PM
Theres 100% chance he gets acquitted in the senate. What good is securing the right to a criminal prosecution if its only coming after 4 more years of him being president?
12/13/2019 12:07:24 AM
^Speaking of hypotheticals, what good is waiting until after the 2020 election in the case that Republicans hold on to the Senate, genius?
12/13/2019 1:49:58 AM
I'm saying its obvious that if they were serious about it, they would keep it alive by keeping it in the house. This would not involve waiting as there is still a lot more that can be done. It would involve more investigation, more testimony and maybe even more articles. They've only scratched the surface on what they could do. This is the quickest impeachment in history.
12/13/2019 2:09:40 AM
12/13/2019 2:26:29 AM
Well its all about context. I probably should have used 'prolong' instead of 'wait' the first time because you took it to mean "Merrick garland style, sitting on hands, doing nothing" when I clearly stated "keep investigating through the election".
12/13/2019 11:04:38 AM
Yea I don’t get the strategy here. The Dems had a chance to just bog down trump for the next 18 months or whatever it is in a bunch of hearings and investigations one after another. Should have just been 18 months of this and then if he got re-elected maybe push forward and maybe a more favorable Senate situation. Allow the impeachment to loom and be an issue during the election. People already don’t understand / care about some Ukraine Biden scandal and most don’t care about some “know it all professor” telling them why it matters. Yes big deal to anyone who understands what he’s doing but that’s not most of America honestly. People don’t really care and this now goes to the Senate where he is 100% acquitted as they will control the way it’s run and presented. It hands the Republicans such an easy win. I don’t get what they expected out of sending this to the Senate? Did they really think even one Republican would fall out of line? Right now every Dem should be on TV talking about how the president picks on teenagers trying to make the world a better place. Hammer home done lowest common denominator talking points - what the Republicans are great at.[Edited on December 13, 2019 at 11:50 AM. Reason : .]
12/13/2019 11:49:52 AM