no but i really wish the holocaust would be accurately depicted, as opposed to its current portrayal as a crime against the jewish people. go ask 10 people how many people died in the holocaust and who was killed in the holocaust. most of them will say the jews were killed and not mention anyone else, and also most of those who respond with that will say that 6 million people died in the holocaust when it was actually more like 15 million. The jewish population made up less than half the deaths. Therefore the most common depiction of the holocaust--most of which is a result of how its taught-- is not an accurate view of history. This cannot be denied.5million Russian deaths, 3 million Ukrainian deaths and 1.5 million Belarusian deaths. Those crimes were racially motivated, but when do they get their sympathy?
5/25/2007 11:40:33 AM
Where are you getting those numbers?
5/25/2007 11:58:50 AM
5/25/2007 12:09:17 PM
5/25/2007 12:11:07 PM
All 200k of them?[Edited on May 25, 2007 at 1:08 PM. Reason : ps, you visited wikipedia to look up the numbers, and saw the big section on roma. ]
5/25/2007 1:07:35 PM
no actually i didn't. i learned about ww2 in high school. (though often i do utilize wikipedia). . .i just don't like blanket statements like the one that he made.
5/25/2007 1:22:11 PM
5/25/2007 2:58:04 PM
5/25/2007 4:29:08 PM
i dont have time to go into all of this because i'm leaving for vacation but i will address everything in detail later, but for now let me say you're being incredibly obtuse especially when it comes to your examples.first hand, if you're not even practicing the religion then i dont consider you a jew because i do not consider caucasians to be ethnic jews. end of story. please tell me how a european person is middle eastern ethnic.
5/25/2007 5:03:33 PM
Where did Germany get the fuel to burn all those bodies?
5/25/2007 9:00:49 PM
Since we're going into all the crimes of WWII, I'll mention the two million or so ethnic Germans who died as a result of being expelled from Eastern Europe.
5/25/2007 9:18:46 PM
Yeah. Want to know about a REAL "holocaust"? Try the horrific fire-bombing of Dresden. Or the 3 million Germans slaughtered by the U.S., Soviets, & Allies after WWII was over.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/04/15/bomac14.xml
5/26/2007 12:17:11 AM
^ Why is that more believable than the slaughter of the Jews?
5/26/2007 12:23:02 AM
diversity is like mixing shit with ice cream to make the ice cream taste better
5/26/2007 1:44:09 AM
let's all go marry our siblings then!
5/26/2007 1:46:17 AM
It was not part of their blood,It came to them very lateWith long arrears to make good,When the Saxons began to hate, They were not easily moved,They were icy-willing to waitTill every count should be provedEre the Saxons began to hate. Their voices were even and low,Their eyes were level and straight,There was neither sign nor show,When the Saxons began to hate. It was not preached to the crowdIt was not taught by the State,No man spoke it aloud,When the Saxons began to hate. It was not suddenly bred,It will not swiftly abateThrough the chilled years aheadWhen Time shall count from the dateThat the Saxons began to hate.
5/26/2007 1:59:21 AM
How long did it take for the Saxons to start writing shitty poetry?
5/26/2007 2:04:28 AM
how long did it take Jew propaganda to make whites start hating themselves?
5/26/2007 2:12:10 AM
Oh, now, Salisburyby, you just tried to answer a question with another question.And I am doing some real soul-searching, but I can't find the part of me that hates white people as a group. Maybe it's blocked out by the very large, vocal part of me that says your poem was shitty.
5/26/2007 2:23:20 AM
I'm so hurt that you think the poem was "shitty". I'm going to go cry now.
5/26/2007 2:36:39 AM
question: Why is that[salisburyboy's previous post] more believable than the slaughter of the Jews?answer: diversity is like mixing shit with ice cream to make the ice cream taste better
5/26/2007 4:04:53 AM
Salisburyboy, look, you can't just put random words in quotation marks like that. It isn't as though I meant something other than what you would normally take shitty to mean. There is no double entendre. I used exactly the word that I thought most adequately described the poor quality of your ethnocentric poem with a grating rythm and childish rhyme scheme.
5/26/2007 11:38:50 AM
Why do you feel the need to try to convince us again that you really think the poem is "shitty"?Reminds me of how people who claim to believe in the theory of evolution explain/defend their "belief" in it.
5/26/2007 12:13:56 PM
5/26/2007 1:44:34 PM
There we go again, putting things arbitrarily into quotation marks.
5/26/2007 1:55:07 PM
Elvis Presley is part Jewish.WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?!?!?
6/1/2007 11:40:44 PM
Elvis Presley is was part Jewish.
6/2/2007 12:48:07 AM
Elvis lives on.And you're an ugly, obnoxious bitch.
6/2/2007 4:15:10 AM
and you're a vapid cunt.[Edited on June 2, 2007 at 10:45 AM. Reason : ]
6/2/2007 10:45:27 AM
from that article:
6/2/2007 12:21:05 PM
6/5/2007 12:37:45 PM
6/5/2007 12:42:11 PM
6/5/2007 12:58:16 PM
you wish I was a homo like you
6/5/2007 1:22:14 PM
seriously, why all the hate?
6/5/2007 1:23:00 PM
it's time good people learned to hateie, to hate that which is evil and those seeking to destroy all that is good
6/5/2007 1:27:54 PM
now if you could just define evil and good for the world, we'll be in business
6/5/2007 1:43:50 PM
6/5/2007 2:22:49 PM
I think its cute that you can't have a rational discussion or defend your ideas.However you did call me a homo. Well done. You must be proud of yourself.Now go write some poetry and crank out another pretty collage.
6/5/2007 6:28:13 PM