2/14/2011 11:08:09 AM
2/14/2011 11:12:29 AM
maybe you're right in that we've probably dug ourselves into a hole too deep to get out of.But adder's point was that, putting Lowe aside, NCSU has had a pretty tough ACC schedule so far. We've played all the teams in the top half of the conference. Our remaining schedule should allow us to pick up some wins.
2/14/2011 11:15:30 AM
I really only see us beating Georgia Tech in Raleigh, and just maybe VA in Charlottesville (but you know we're an awful road team so maybe not). Giving us 2 more wins and 5 ACC wins total.I would think that is the most realistic prediction, but you never know with some of you guys.[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 11:22 AM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 11:19:58 AM
2/14/2011 11:22:49 AM
2/14/2011 11:27:52 AM
^^ you really are terrible[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM. Reason : in my Steve Erkel voice]^ but do you think we're going to win? I doubt we'll be favorites in either one of those games.[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 11:30 AM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 11:28:05 AM
^nah dude. you are. you make up arguments. you constantly complain. you bitch. you berate the college team you supposedly support. you make up more arguments. yo attack anyone who tries to say something good about the college team they support. you bitch. and make up more arguments. and you are a terrible troll too.
2/14/2011 11:32:55 AM
2/14/2011 11:36:08 AM
the saddest thing about that DBR article was seeing our cumulative ACC record under Lowe compared to the rest of the leagueDuke 51-20UNC 48-22Maryland 42-29Virginia Tech 40-31(tie) FSU and Clemson 39-32Wake Forest 33-37Boston College 33-38Virginia 29-44Georgia Tech 27-44Miami 24-47N.C. State 22-49
2/14/2011 11:36:39 AM
2/14/2011 12:07:57 PM
it would be nice for Lowe to put together a run and go out on a high note.
2/14/2011 12:08:40 PM
2/14/2011 12:20:13 PM
2/14/2011 12:33:56 PM
oh that's right. oh that's right. oh that's right.... comical.
2/14/2011 12:52:02 PM
2/14/2011 1:04:14 PM
Bullet's contribution to the thread in the last page:
2/14/2011 1:04:56 PM
2/14/2011 3:12:49 PM
^^you really are terrible man. there's a reason you've been suspended multiple times (yet keep coming back)
2/14/2011 3:19:33 PM
2/14/2011 3:22:42 PM
2/14/2011 3:32:50 PM
I agree with everything he said. The UNC comment kinda stings, but that seems to be the perception. I do think we'll need to open up the wallet this time around.This is one of those situations where you get what you pay for, and Lowe has to be one of the lowest paid coaches in the ACC.
2/14/2011 3:38:20 PM
I'm curious Ohboyeeee, do you go to school or have a job or anything? You seem to spend your entire day from sunrise to sunset being the very next reply anytime anyone posts in this thread. Surely you have something more important to do than spend every waking moment on TWW.
2/14/2011 3:43:52 PM
Is that right? I'm curious to know why you (and Bullet) are so obsessed with all of my posts to the point where you are actually monitoring my TWW usage. Surely you have something more important to do than that?Why does it upset you when I post on TWW? That's kind of weird. Send me a PM if it really does bother you so much and we can talk about it. In the mean time let's try not to derail this thread.[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM. Reason : stalkers]
2/14/2011 4:13:16 PM
lets try not to derail this 280 page troll thread
2/14/2011 4:19:53 PM
My bad for derailing this serious thread.So let's get back to it. What are we discussing.... ah yes, our coach's credibility.Now where were we? What was the argument?
2/14/2011 4:30:56 PM
2/14/2011 4:42:49 PM
Actually, I got suspended for doing what you and Bullet are doing right now.
2/14/2011 4:45:56 PM
for supporting our basketball team?
2/14/2011 4:52:31 PM
It's easy to understand why the most ardent Lowe supporters want to derail this thread. The motive is obvious. It's easier to troll people and derail the thread rather than having to admit that you were 100% wrong on your judgment of Lowe's credibility throughout this entire thread since 2007. Meanwhile some of us were calling for a new coach 2 or 3 years ago as soon as we saw that our teams were in a constant state of disarray.Still credible though, right?[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:15 PM. Reason : []
2/14/2011 5:13:37 PM
Who are "ardent Lowe supporters"?Who is saying he is "credible"?Are you really that slow?You're really stuck on this "i'm 100% right, and you're 100% wrong", aren't ya?
2/14/2011 5:21:01 PM
i dunno why i'm even gonna address this but
2/14/2011 5:23:22 PM
so after Lowe's first season does not equal 2 or 3 years ago.I can't believe I have to explain that to you.[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:29 PM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 5:29:12 PM
ok so halfway through his 2nd season then = 3 years agoyou were ready to fire him less than 2 years into his tenurenow we can keep arguing mathematics, or you can respond as to whether or not you wanted him fired before he even finished his 2nd season
2/14/2011 5:30:54 PM
Everything (except our head coach) has to be qualified for you doesn't it, Tree.At the end of his 2nd season I wouldn't have had any problems if he was let go.And who cares what day I wanted him fired 3 years ago, I was right. Can you at least admit that?[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:38 PM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 5:35:21 PM
2/14/2011 5:40:03 PM
2/14/2011 5:40:36 PM
I'm saying he hasn't been firedAnd it would be about as braindead as you to fire him midseasonEDIT:
2/14/2011 5:41:15 PM
Ha Ha. No no no. Read your own quote again please kindly, good sir:
2/14/2011 5:45:18 PM
^^^Meh...I wasn't calling for a coaching change 2/3 years ago and I honestly didn't even discuss Lowe's coaching ability...but I was also not happy with the hire, and after two years, I didn't think he was a good enough coach to make it here. For the couple years after that, I was hoping that he would get better as a coach and that maybe his offensive and defensive strategies would better suit the players that he was bringing in. But obviously that hasn't happened.I felt the same way about Amato after our 10-win season. That three game losing streak after starting 9-0 showed a lot of coaching deficiencies. There were a lot of other "doh" moments before and after that year as well. So although there was definitely not any heat on his seat after that year, I didn't have a good feeling about him being our head coach.
2/14/2011 5:46:23 PM
God damn
2/14/2011 5:46:36 PM
1. i havent ghost edited a single post in this thread since you 'called me out' on it last night, i supposed since you like to argue about stupid shit in sports talk, like semantics and editing posts2.
2/14/2011 5:47:28 PM
oh hey, Ernie!^ hmmmm... think real real hard about it. Try to use some common sense here. Is he the right coach for the job (you clearly think he is though b/c we beat WF yesterday apparently)? [Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 5:47:32 PM
2/14/2011 5:49:01 PM
Hey tree, is there an easy cheap way to get tac mask pro? Or do I need to just keep spamming grenades and hope for the best?
2/14/2011 5:49:26 PM
Let me try this again just for you Tree.ACC standings past 5 years-------------------------AllotherACCTeams------NCSU <--- dead last
2/14/2011 5:50:11 PM
only 'easy' ones are the 20/20 gas grenades since they work on people in 2nd Chance, whereas it seems stuns and flashes don't count towards the 20^9th place last year = DEAD LASTlemme guess, this season it goes:1. Duke2. UNC3-1011. Wake ForestDEAD LAST. NC State[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:51 PM. Reason : you are a worthless post]TreeTwista: "How were you right about him being fired if he coached as recently as yesterday"MilkBoner: "ZOMG YOU THINK WE SHOULD KEEP HIM BECAUSE WE BEAT WAKE"TreeTwista: "No, I'm simply pointing out that you were wrong about him being fired, since he wasn't fired"MilkBoner: "BULLSHIT YOU WERE CLEARLY SAYING HE SHOULD BE HERE BECAUSE WE BEAT WAKE"[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:53 PM. Reason : WHAT A RETARD]
2/14/2011 5:50:40 PM
Cumulative record over 5 years and we are dead last, but you knew exactly what I was talking about. I was right that he needed to be fired. We could have used these past three years to rebuild, but now we're 9th 10th in the ACC!! Yay! Thanks for coming out.[Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:54 PM. Reason : jj.][Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:55 PM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 5:53:36 PM
he hasn't been here 5 years
2/14/2011 5:54:16 PM
he hasn't been here just one year either, but he's still on the sidelines, MUST have been 100% correct call to retain him after each year of suckage... makes perfect sense to me. [Edited on February 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM. Reason : .]
2/14/2011 5:54:36 PM