7/21/2008 2:34:56 PM
7/21/2008 2:42:20 PM
I saw the movie Saturday afternoon at Crossroads (in theater 1). The focus was rather dull and there was a large, lighter than normal block of the screen in the top left corner. I didn't complain during the movie because I didn't want to leave, and there were just too many people in my aisle. Afterwards, I went to guest services to complain. They ended up giving me back the money for the ticket, and I decided that I'll definitely see it in IMAX downtown next time. Awesome movie!
7/21/2008 2:45:30 PM
7/21/2008 2:47:05 PM
anyone know where I can find the main score of the movie?
7/21/2008 2:47:32 PM
^ The score's out on CD...try Amazon.
7/21/2008 2:49:22 PM
pretty funny story:http://tinyurl.com/6ozxtti dont know how i would've handled that situation
7/21/2008 2:51:53 PM
I would have definitely gotten kicked out
7/21/2008 2:57:08 PM
Yeah...every time I talk to someone about the movie and about how great Ledger was...I also mention how sad it is because we will be deprived of his acting in the future (not to mention future roles as the Joker). I was one of the few people that were optimistic when he was named to play the Joker role. He might not have the best movie resume (but honestly...its actually pretty good), but I've always felt like he was a good actor.However...thinking about it...I believe it would have been difficult to bring him back in another movie. He's such a captivating character, that it would be hard to bring him back and not have him in a huge role like he was in TDK. I couldn't imagine another Batman film where Joker would play a minor role (at least with Heath playing him). Oh well...those are just my thoughts.And going back one more time to two-face...I really only remember him from the cartoons. And the cartoons didn't have him as grotesque as the comic books. So I guess I'm a little off-base if they're trying to be original. But if you're going to go that route, I think they could have made it more grotesque and less fake. I didn't think his face looked gross at all...it was almost comical to me.
7/21/2008 3:00:29 PM
You have to strike a balance...it needs to be grotesque but also easy to deal with. You can't have people holding back vomit at every appearance of your main villain (assuming Harvey plays a significant part in the future).
7/21/2008 3:02:32 PM
For some reason I have a feeling it will change a little bit for the next movie. Probably not drastically...but open wounds like that will change/heal/scab up after a little while.
7/21/2008 3:11:38 PM
they said it was originally a lot more gruesome but they cleaned it up a lot
7/21/2008 3:45:10 PM
SpoilersSomeone please answer these questions b/c I'm in Puerto Rico and the movie still isn't out so I had to watch a cam and didn't understand the story fully.Whats the deal with everyone expecting more two-face. I got the impression that he died at the end of the movie.Also, was that the scarecrow in the beginning and if so wasn't he against the Batman copycat?After watching TDK I wouldn't even mind if the third movie had Joker as the main villain again seeing as how he played it so well. Maybe I'm an asshole but I thought the guys at the end not blowing up the other ships was kind of corny and I expected Joker to blow them both up to make them pay. Did he attempt to do this or not I couldn't tell.I read some Batman but not enough to have ever heard of Deadshot, is he a legit comic villain?Maybe I didn't catch it earlier but who was that first guy Two-Face killed at the bar that was bald?I totally missed Alfreds story about Burma, did he say some dude was throwing out ruby's or what was the deal?Why did Joker break a broomstick and say he was hiring or something, what were they supposed to do in order to work for him? Were they supposed to fight to the death or something?Wasn't Batman's new suit less bulletproof and knife resistant but made him more agile?
7/22/2008 2:57:28 AM
7/22/2008 5:14:06 AM
is groundbeef five? and/or retarded?
7/22/2008 5:58:01 AM
^hahaha, i was wondering the same.....i was just so stunned at that paragraph i felt the need to answer
7/22/2008 5:59:51 AM
7/22/2008 7:56:56 AM
The guy can't get shot and live?? This is a move ya know.
7/22/2008 8:24:13 AM
come on, folks. Two Face isn't dead.geeeeez.and yeah, JOKER JOYRIDE FTMFW
7/22/2008 8:27:21 AM
Sure, but at least have him say "ouch" or maybe even grab his shoulder or something in a later scene to acknowledge the fact that he got shot. Otherwise it's pointless.
7/22/2008 8:27:44 AM
I think it's been said before, but I wasn't that upset about ledger passing until I saw this movienow I'm really upset
7/22/2008 8:42:14 AM
7/22/2008 8:47:10 AM
I remember thinking he did not get hit but I would have to watch again
7/22/2008 8:49:01 AM
He did not get hit
7/22/2008 8:51:11 AM
saw it a second time, the sniper barely misses.
7/22/2008 8:53:31 AM
7/22/2008 8:53:52 AM
I was a little confused about that whole part actually. So Batman recovered the bullet fragments from the wall and analyzed it for fingerprints. So the prints from the bullet fragments were from the dude that lived in the apartment he went to (where the policemen were tied up), right? And was that an intentional clue left by the Joker?
7/22/2008 9:00:17 AM
I don't think he was trying to set Joker up or anything ... Joker just happened to use that guy's gun (or, had that guy push in the round) to kill a guy named Harvey and a guy named Dent.And when Batman found out who the guy was, he realized Joker was probably using that person's residence to set up the Mayor at the police commissioner's funeral.It was just some guy with an adjacent window. Wayne was hoping to show up and stop a sniper. Instead, he walked in on an automated window that opened to create a distraction for Joker.
7/22/2008 9:05:47 AM
^ding ding ding
7/22/2008 9:09:02 AM
That still doesn't address the question:So the joker knew that someone would be able to trace the killings back to that apartment, even though it required some amazing - unknown to the public - batman forensics to arrive at that conclusion. They also planned on whomever to arrive at the apartment at the precise moment needed to create the distraction. Not the hour before, or a day later.Yeah, it's a movie. Just sayin'.[Edited on July 22, 2008 at 9:16 AM. Reason : -]
7/22/2008 9:15:30 AM
He didn't know Bat-gizmos were gonna trace anything to the apartment.There was a camera on a tripod set up in the window. That would have been distraction enough with how paranoid everyone was ... Wayne just happened to be there at the wrong time.
7/22/2008 9:19:23 AM
yeah, it didn't matter if someone was in the window or not, they cops would have still fired at a blind that instantly opened with some apparatus pointing at the mayorit was just extreme bad luck that wayne was there
7/22/2008 9:35:56 AM
My bad. I thought Wayne actually triggered the blind opening. Maybe it was that clock timer or something. I'd have to see it again.[Edited on July 22, 2008 at 9:37 AM. Reason : -]
7/22/2008 9:36:29 AM
This is why you should have already seen the movie twice
7/22/2008 9:38:12 AM
^^of course it was the clock timer
7/22/2008 9:48:01 AM
They probably had it coming....bitches.I wonder if he talked to them in "Batman voice" after he beat their ass.
7/22/2008 9:53:42 AM
they probably saw the movie, and then asked if he actually did anything worthwhile in itthe only thing people are talking about is the joker and two face anyway
7/22/2008 10:05:04 AM
I didn't really care a lot about two-face, but I liked the scene when he's like "you're lucky...but your driver isn't" and buckles up
7/22/2008 10:32:42 AM
As for the "realism", its not very realistic at all. The DNA results come back the next day and why would they even have the DNA of those three people on hand unless they had done some sort of crime which I doubt considering there positions.Also, how did the judges DNA get on the card from merely flipping the card over during the court case because DNA does not come from fingerprints. Did the judge not think it was weird that a Joker card was in her case files?
7/22/2008 10:44:02 AM
^ did they say there were three sets of DNA or three sets of fingerprints?
7/22/2008 10:59:13 AM
^^I don't remember the details...But all of those people holding public offices (judge, DA, and Mayor)...wouldn't their fingerprints be on file?? And I can't remember if they said DNA or fingerprints. If they said fingerprints, then that would make sense.And I completely forgot about the corniness of the boats and blowing up. I will say that it was pretty corny (especially the guy who had been bitching the whole time not pushing the button...but not Devo not doing it, because that kind made sense)...however...it did fit in perfectly with the story/ending where Batman was saying that they needed Harvey Dent and such.
7/22/2008 11:25:40 AM
^ deebo, not
7/22/2008 11:42:12 AM
Yeah...my bad.
7/22/2008 11:43:36 AM
I dont know, the random broadway musical scene killed it for me
7/22/2008 11:46:50 AM
it was DNA, not fingerprints.and the judges DNA didn't have to get on the card from her handling it in court. Though it's possible. It's possible this is a different card all together.It wouldn't be too hard to the joker's goons to get DNA from 3 people. Watch CSI, that shit is everywhere!
7/22/2008 11:48:15 AM
Chalk this one up to bad timing:http://omg.yahoo.com/news/report-batman-accused-of-assaulting-mom-sister/11062?nc
7/22/2008 12:24:53 PM
^by you:
7/22/2008 12:30:41 PM
Dammit But being accused and arrested are two different things[Edited on July 22, 2008 at 12:39 PM. Reason : ]
7/22/2008 12:34:25 PM
His mom and sister must be real bitches. Don't fuck with your meal ticket.
7/22/2008 12:53:52 PM
Bale's Mom: I swear that I'll never insult you as an actor again!Bale (in Batman voice): SWEAR TO ME![Edited on July 22, 2008 at 12:55 PM. Reason : in Batman voice]
7/22/2008 12:55:23 PM