https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-business-sought-deal-on-a-trump-tower-in-moscow-while-he-ran-for-president/2017/08/27/d6e95114-8b65-11e7-91d5-ab4e4bb76a3a_story.html?utm_term=.fac2d3e5e8c6
8/27/2017 10:00:04 PM
All this Felix Sater stuff that's dropping is old I feel like. Remember hearing about it months ago...[Edited on August 28, 2017 at 12:48 PM. Reason : I do lol about how insignificant the Wiki emails releases are compared to this and Don Jrs though]
8/28/2017 12:45:07 PM
Yea the Sater stuff has been under investigation for quite a while now. But I believe this particular information is new, considering it mentions the pursuit of a deal in Russia during the actual campaign.
8/28/2017 1:45:23 PM
we now know that all the dates coincide with putin's endorsement and when trump adopted his friendly position on putin/russia
8/28/2017 2:54:41 PM
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/28/us/politics/trump-tower-putin-felix-sater.html
8/28/2017 3:45:01 PM
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-knew-moscow-tower-proposal-campaign-lawyer/story?id=49472342"I have nothing to do with Russia."
8/28/2017 5:23:11 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/30/trump-tower-russia-meeting-chuck-grassley
8/30/2017 2:55:20 PM
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nbc-news-reports-manafort-took-notes-on-donations-russian-lawyer
8/31/2017 4:32:08 PM
Doesn't suggest it, states the evidence indicates it:
8/31/2017 5:05:06 PM
I'm curious as to whether the DNC was referenced as a means to say, perhaps, that Manafort's notes contained a typo and that "RNC" donations should have actually been noted as "DNC" donations.
8/31/2017 5:10:29 PM
so hes prolly doimg this dprk stuff to pull the trigger as soon as anything from this starts to come down the pipe.
8/31/2017 6:45:52 PM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/348798-mueller-teams-up-with-irs-in-russia-probe-reportBREAKING: Special counsel Robert Mueller has reportedly teamed up with members of the IRS' Criminal Investigation unit that specialize in prosecuting financial crimes like tax evasion and money laundering in the ongoing investigation into collusion between President Trump and Russia.
8/31/2017 8:21:02 PM
8/31/2017 9:55:33 PM
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/903249294299471872
9/1/2017 1:49:30 PM
9/1/2017 1:55:09 PM
When you lay it all out like that it begs the question: how the fuck has no one been indicted yet?
9/1/2017 2:23:18 PM
because it's a serious issue, and potential constitutional crisis, so you have to make damn sure your case is rock solid
9/1/2017 3:53:24 PM
^also, thanks for posting all of that, looks like it took forever. absolute insanity
9/1/2017 3:57:12 PM
^^but they make it look so easy on CSIThis is rich:RT reporting the FBI is gonna search that Russian consulate in San Fran that got shut downhttps://www.rt.com/news/401770-searches-russian-consulate-sf/The twitters are reporting a steady stream of smoke from the top of the consulate (destroying evidence being the obvious explanation)https://mobile.twitter.com/jpaceDC/status/903699071520690176
9/1/2017 4:09:09 PM
^FBI would never be able to do that unless Russia asked them to. When it comes to compounds like that, if told to vacate the country they box every single thing up and ship it out via diplomatic transit. If it's a rush job, they'll burn anything sensitive and destroy any machines too difficult to move quickly such as cryptography equipment. So to be honest, nothing seems out of the ordinary to me here.
9/1/2017 4:28:59 PM
^I'm with you on everything after your first sentence, especially since its a rush job they are in full on shred/incinerate mode right now. However, everyone should expect that the FBI will absolutely be going into the building after the deadline (there likely won't be much for them to find).[Edited on September 1, 2017 at 5:44 PM. Reason : 0]
9/1/2017 5:44:02 PM
THEYRE BURNING THE PEEPEE TAPE. ITS THE ROSETTA STONE TO FINALLY GETTING THE EVANGELICALS TO TURN ON TRUMP. WE NEED THAT FUCKIN TAPE!!!!!!!
9/1/2017 5:56:13 PM
^^Oh yea, I just mean they weren't going through breakdown phase because the FBI was showing up with a warrant on the Trump investigation. FBI wasn't getting in there at all until either they were invited in or until Russia had vacated completely.[Edited on September 1, 2017 at 6:02 PM. Reason : a][Edited on September 1, 2017 at 6:05 PM. Reason : a]
9/1/2017 5:57:19 PM
so now apparently there might be eyewitnesses from trying to get prostitutes into the hotel? not much left from the dossier now
9/5/2017 11:38:49 AM
http://www.newsweek.com/what-exactly-does-steele-dirty-russian-pee-tape-dossier-trump-contain-660327This is a good read for understanding the context of the dossier.[Edited on September 6, 2017 at 1:04 PM. Reason : a]
9/6/2017 12:59:33 PM
Seems like shit is coming to a head regarding social media's role. It's the part of this we need the most investigation into. To better understand how it can influence/manipulate people, and we can start having discussions (hopefully) on what should be done, if anything. It could very well govern how we interact on social media for the next decade (get ready for endless Captcha)
9/7/2017 7:06:26 PM
Social media was geared 99% towards getting Hillary Clinton elected. Any "investigation" into the role of social media is a poorly disguised excuse to legitimize the suppression of opinions not financially beneficial to the likes of Facebook and Twitter.
9/8/2017 6:23:12 PM
lol
9/8/2017 7:22:23 PM
Adorbs
9/9/2017 2:39:11 AM
free speech bish. maybe if you invested in education, you wouldn't have to worry about people being swayed by social media. Controlling people with propaganda works both ways. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
9/9/2017 3:37:18 AM
I clearly left my statement open ended:
9/9/2017 8:27:11 AM
they profited off of groups like Correct The Record and Shareblue a hell of a lot more.
9/9/2017 3:22:06 PM
http://www.newsweek.com/russia-russian-spies-bronx-diplomats-2016-election-donald-trump-hillary-662320
9/10/2017 8:27:25 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/susan-rice-house-investigators-unmasked-trump-officials/index.html
9/13/2017 8:28:20 PM
^considering the UAE's involvement in 9/11, it's seems legit AF to unmask who they were meeting with.This made me say wow:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/facebook-enabled-ads-jew-hatersAfter reading it's not quite as sinister as the headline, but it was still interesting reading about facebook's ad targeting capabilities. It's a vast width of categories, and some of those categories are disgusting.
9/14/2017 6:28:10 PM
^agree entirely. the whole situation is just amazing
9/14/2017 7:21:39 PM
http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/15/media/facebook-mueller-ads/index.htmlSo Mueller got a warrant so he could get the Facebook ads. I guess we can assume there is probable cause that a law was broken.
9/17/2017 9:18:04 AM
Sounds like he is getting all the pieces if he includes the bot/Russian agent accounts.. this hopefully will be a concrete improvement/update at the FEC. Because a million dollar ad campaign on tv/radio is nothing to a million dollar Facebook ad campaign + hired commentors.
9/17/2017 12:19:32 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/18/politics/paul-manafort-government-wiretapped-fisa-russians/index.html
9/18/2017 8:12:57 PM
So we're supposed to believe the Trump lawyers are just so stupid that they talked about the case at a sidewalk table across the street from the new york times? Then after they saw a new york times reporter sitting next to them alone and taking pictures, they continued to talk about specifics?? Get real!
9/18/2017 10:49:39 PM
You can believe whatever you want. To you, Trump's a political genius, so have fun with whatever world you're living in right now.
9/18/2017 10:52:57 PM
I live in the world where Donald Trump is the presidentBut why did you post that article with an emoji and no editorial? What about Trump's wiretap claims from months ago that everyone said he was crazy for? Now that we have this information, isn't he vindicated for what seemed like a wild claim? Seems like another example of Trump being ahead of the curve so I'd love to hear your take.[Edited on September 19, 2017 at 12:07 AM. Reason : most liberals live in a world where hillary is the president and we are being occupied by russia]
9/18/2017 11:48:35 PM
9/19/2017 12:11:24 AM
^^not even close
9/19/2017 1:10:26 AM
When you guys just say no and give no reasoning on the day of, it reaffirms the idea that you are waiting for someone to write a narrative that fits your predetermined conclusion.
9/19/2017 2:34:54 AM
It's quite simple. Obama didn't wiretap Trump as he claimed. Obama has nothing to do with a FISA surveillance on Paul Manafort.Surveillance on Paul Manafort is not a wiretap on Trump Tower by a "sick guy."It is LOL-worthy that Trump supporters see this as a win, though.
9/19/2017 5:50:57 AM
^^it's weird that you ask dumb questions and then expect detailed answersBut nym partially got you started. Trump made 3 claims in that infamous tweet, the manafort news supports none.1. Obama did it (no, FBI and fisa courts)2. Tapped Trump tower (no, tapped manafort)3. Found nothing (no, found suspicious activity)So like I saidNo
9/19/2017 7:23:54 AM
9/19/2017 7:56:25 AM
9/19/2017 9:33:24 AM
9/19/2017 11:47:49 AM