10/28/2006 6:26:07 PM
10/29/2006 10:58:05 AM
no, actually, it doesn't.polls suggest that he's going to win reelection which is what this whole case is all about anyway.not only that, as an agent of the state, he has very broad immunity - not only will he never suffer any consequences, his actions also enjoy the support of 50% of the population in durham, and all the "civil rights" leaders in the nation have his back bigtimeif anything, this year is probably one of his happiest and most satisfying. I mean, wouldn't you feel like you were the shit if you successfully played an entire demographic to achieve your goals? I know I would
10/29/2006 11:12:10 AM
Criminal immunity yes, but not federal civil rights immunity - and certainly not immunity from professional discipline. I would feel LIKE shit if I got my law license taken away from me. Which is likely what will happen in this case.
10/29/2006 3:01:39 PM
lol bullshiti'm not saying he doesn't deserve it, just that the white lawyering establishment would never touch this issue. Jesse Jackson and the BPP made sure it became about race instead of the facts[Edited on October 29, 2006 at 6:24 PM. Reason : s]
10/29/2006 6:22:27 PM
10/29/2006 7:08:21 PM
^ Uh. . ."showed my ass" how?
10/30/2006 2:54:52 AM
PS: "PWNT all around"? You're insane!
10/30/2006 2:59:36 AM
The "PWNT all around!" thing was a joke.And you showed your ass when you bragged about prejudging the Kobe Bryant situation.
10/30/2006 3:02:46 AM
I knew it didn't smell right from the beginning. And I was right:"When Bryant's accuser underwent her medical exam, swabs were taken from her vagina and thighs. Also, fabric samples were taken from the yellow underpants she wore to the exam and the purple pair worn during her encounter with Bryant. Initially, this evidence was analyzed by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation at the crime lab in Denver, which found that the pair worn to the exam contained a semen stain belonging to a man other than Bryant. The defense subsequently ran its own forensic tests on the underwear and the swabs collected from the accuser. The analysis was performed by a private lab in Ventura, Calif., operated by Marc Taylor, a former L.A. Medical Examiner's Office criminalist who worked as an expert witness for the O.J. Simpson defense team. Taylor's lab reported that it found sperm from a man other than Bryant -- identified as Mr. X -- in both pairs of the accuser's underwear and on the swabs taken from her body."http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2004/magazine/08/31/scorecard0906/index.htmlKobe doesn't need to rape a woman. He gets more pussy thrown at him than most men would see in dozens of lifetimes. As for O.J., I didn't bring him up but I agree with the guy who did. Some of us remember that he killed two people. And understand, I was a big fan of Juice--before he turned to murder.
10/30/2006 3:27:04 AM
I've always been inclined to think that OJ was innocentI'll never understand this auto-guilt mechanism[Edited on October 30, 2006 at 7:01 AM. Reason : s]
10/30/2006 7:01:20 AM
10/30/2006 7:25:52 AM
10/30/2006 8:20:57 AM
10/30/2006 1:42:28 PM
and there are plenty of women that would be willing to give it to kobe any way he wanted them to, it's not silly it's just that there are women that throw themselves at men with money/celebrity status
10/30/2006 3:27:50 PM
10/30/2006 5:20:46 PM
exactly
10/30/2006 5:42:59 PM
sounds like something went down, but it was over-exaggeratedshe obviously felt aggrievedif she were that disillusioned, why would she even get herself into it? i don't think she's that complicatedif she were after publicity, surely we would've heard more by nowif anyone's guilty in the legal sense, it's nifong, but i doubt he's guilty of much
10/30/2006 8:06:56 PM
I haven't forgotten about the t shirts for the Dook basketball game.Got Rape? with Duke logo on front
10/30/2006 8:10:52 PM
10/31/2006 2:54:28 AM
^ Rough sex can cause the same type of "injuries." And some girls like it rough. By the way, concerning the O.J. thing, my fiancee's former boss testified in the trial as a statistician. He had a photo of the "bloody glove" and the probability numbers that O.J. did it framed and hanging in his office. After seeing the trial and seeing those astronomical probability numbers, there is no doubt in my mind that O.J. did it. In addition, when he got off on murder charges, why did some people feel the need to cheer and celebrate?
10/31/2006 3:11:53 AM
^^i am in no way saying that a famous or rich person couldnt commit rape, i am just saying that in your given comment about kobe having to rape somebody b/c he is bored with sex when in reality there are plenty of women out there that would let him anything that he pleases. At the same time i can also see a celebrity overstepping their boundaries with the reasoning that "hey i'm rich and famous you know you want it".So i am def not putting it past any person to rape somebody
10/31/2006 3:51:35 AM
i really dont see how the video aids in the player's defense.why is it hard to believe that the accuser had recovered from the pain of the attack in the 9 days in between her alleged attack and alleged performance? athletes "play through the pain" all the time, yet a dancer doing the same is discredited?and the inconsistency of her emotions regarding the alleged attack seem absurd why? plenty of people have ups and downs following a traumatic incident. just because she didnt stop going to work and become homeless and depressed and stop eating, her story becomes harder to believe?
10/31/2006 9:08:45 AM
yes
10/31/2006 10:01:26 AM
wow, this is still going on?
10/31/2006 11:16:21 AM
yes, and just wait till the trial starts. If they have one.
10/31/2006 11:19:01 AM
in the N&O today
10/31/2006 11:50:41 AM
I read somewhere that the second stipper has hired someone (or been "contacted" by people) to help her "spin" this situation her way. She lost all credibility when she agreed to that. She is just another attention whore (zomg, literally?).
10/31/2006 1:04:36 PM
I know it's off-topic, but as far as the Kobe case goes, I'm with BridgetSPK. I won't make a judgement about whether or not it was rape in Kobe's case, but the number of women willing to throw themselves at a celebrity has nothing to do with how likely the celebrity is to rape a woman. Rape is less about sex and more about power. Even God's Gift to Women is capable of rape, and possibly even inclined to commit it.
10/31/2006 9:34:56 PM
likewise, false accusations of rape are about power
10/31/2006 9:36:02 PM
^^ Maybe, maybe not - but it does have a lot to do with the ability of those women to make false accusations of rape, which of course is what this entire thread is about.
11/1/2006 12:36:34 AM
11/1/2006 3:51:12 AM
If the newspapers are not going to print the accuser's name, they shouldn't print the names of the accused unless there is a conviction. My bad. I thought the newspapers might want people to believe they're impartial.Thinking about it, maybe it's better for people to realize they're yellow journalism.
11/1/2006 11:03:31 AM
i think the lying bitch should be charged with crimes once its found she is lying.
11/1/2006 12:59:42 PM
I wonder if you could get both Nifong and the stripper on libel and slander and conspiracy to comit libel and slander charges.
11/1/2006 1:31:23 PM
not a chance in hell
11/1/2006 1:32:20 PM
I don't know which is worse:1) The accuser is lying and nothing really happenedor2) She did in fact get rapedOn one hand I would never want someone to be raped. On the other hand, if she is lying, this will have lasting effects because it will cause more people to make horrible comments like, "i think the lying bitch should be charged with crimes once its found she is lying" and it will deter others from ever reporting it.
11/1/2006 2:34:21 PM
I love Nifong's campaign signs...They're so creative:keepNIFONG
11/1/2006 4:44:50 PM
11/1/2006 5:05:43 PM
To enjoy such imunity wouldn't he have to act in his responsibilities as a prosecuter? Couldn't you argue that he was negligent in his duties and shouldn't enjoy such immunity? Not saying you could win it but would it be possible to argue it succesfully?
11/1/2006 8:42:35 PM
^and that's what they would determine in a civil suit
11/1/2006 8:50:09 PM
I was responding to the "lying b***h" comment. My fear is that it would serve to encourage people to dismiss accusers as "lying b***hes" prior to trial.
11/2/2006 9:59:33 AM
^^^ Not really - prosecuting people is within his duties as prosecutor. The whole reason for immunity is to protect against negligence suits for someone acting within their official duties.^ If it becomes so clear that the person is lying, then what's wrong with it?
11/2/2006 6:32:15 PM
Double edged sword as far as the lying bitch thing goes.No, people who make the accusation shouldn't be discountedBut I dont think that means that those who clearly make the accusation falsely should go unpunished. The solution though would be to only punish in clear cases of lying where a seperate trial could be made to really determine that, not just in cases where the defendant is found innocent.[Edited on November 3, 2006 at 2:53 AM. Reason : .]
11/3/2006 2:53:34 AM
there is no way they would win a federal civil rights claim. Nifong would ahve to be depriving them of some constitutional right which he is not doing. You cant even argue equal protection because being rich is not a protected class
11/3/2006 10:34:14 AM
I fail to see how it is "clear" she is lying, if your opinion is based upon information made public via the defendants on 60 minutes, the other Stripper, and the internet. Coupling this with "armchair" legal analysis does not make something "clear"
11/3/2006 12:08:01 PM
I think those guys did it. Nifong would not be going this far to make a bafoon out of himself. If someone sais they were raped, then by god give them their day in court.
11/3/2006 12:13:56 PM
Mike Nifuck:WHAT A FUCKWAD!
11/3/2006 12:33:01 PM
Nervous Nellie Brodhead:
11/3/2006 12:36:48 PM
11/3/2006 12:49:41 PM