Ok, I'm going to have to assume you supported Bush.And then I'm going to lol at you for talking about how vital it is for the President to exercise leadership over the executive branch.
10/8/2008 9:59:54 PM
10/8/2008 10:03:17 PM
obama will have a lot of help from his chicago buddies who no doubt expect him to return the many favors he owes ... starting with this guy
10/8/2008 10:24:13 PM
For everyone who said Obama basically cannot lose at this point (coughCNNcough)...Latest Zogby Poll:
10/8/2008 10:50:35 PM
10/8/2008 11:00:32 PM
well in fairness, you do often have shitty grammar and spelling...its not the worst trait to have but i know you acknowledge itand that doesn't change the main point of my post which is that TSB != the USA...if TSB were indicative of the country's political climate, Obama would win 90-10%...in reality, he'll probably win 52-48%[Edited on October 8, 2008 at 11:44 PM. Reason : .]
10/8/2008 11:42:30 PM
I can't believe there are people sucking Henry Kissinger's dick and saying he is an asset to McCain (or that he endorsed McCain). Either way, how is Kissinger a good thing?War criminalApproved MANY massacres and genocidesEngineered some massacres and genocidesIndicted/wanted on war crimes and genocide charges in many countries, including Western countriesAnd a full-on assholeOne of the vilest humans ever to live, right up there with Hitler and Stalin.
10/8/2008 11:47:16 PM
right up there with Hitler and Stalin?0EP...you have a strong point going, and then you completely fuck it all up by comparing HENRY KISSINGER to ADOLPH HITLER AND JOSEPH STALINnot the way to make your point, trust me i know]
10/8/2008 11:51:34 PM
its not like he won the nobel peace prize or anything
10/9/2008 1:28:05 AM
so winning the nobel peace prize cancels genocide?and if i brought up Ayers here to show you he has changed since he is a univ prof, you are still going to say he is a terrorist.oh, and a 3rd i-am-sure hypocrisy on your part: Yasir Arafat won the nobel peace prize, but i am sure you (and most americans) see him as a terrorist.
10/9/2008 1:37:08 AM
10/9/2008 1:38:41 AM
^^NSSM 200 was an overblown research paper...genocide is murdering an entire group of people, not limiting food supplies to particular countriesand yeah arafat was definitely a sponsor of terrorism, but "you people" (some tsb liberals) have given arafat a free pass because of his nobel prize, so why are you blowing kissinger's actions out of proportion?as far as ayers, i hope he's changed, but all i bet he's changed is his agressiveness...i believe he still has the same ideals...regardless of how much he's changed, he clearly has some major problems with the country, so much that he hates the country...doesnt seem like the type of company a presidential candidiate should take^i'm pretty sure he was trying to say that Obama supporters were idiots, not Americans...which makes sense to me! [Edited on October 9, 2008 at 1:45 AM. Reason : .]
10/9/2008 1:43:55 AM
10/9/2008 1:44:14 AM
its fine if you post while you're drunk, but you already called me out for that in another thread, and i already PMed you acknowledging that you were correct]
10/9/2008 1:45:33 AM
Bttt for tonight's debate at Hofstra.... let's see if it changes anything (I'm doubtful)
10/15/2008 9:28:19 AM
Obama will win this one, just like the others. It's easy when you're right.
10/15/2008 10:20:38 AM
^ Obama could get cocky and mess up.I don't think he will, but he may.
10/15/2008 11:35:41 AM
McCain is basically walking into a trap tonight. Obama challenged him to bring up the Ayers thing "to his face", and McCain then promised that he would. Now, Obama has had all the time in the world to prepare the perfect counterpunch and McCain can't back down because he would look weak to his base. Should be quite entertaining to see how this plays out.
10/15/2008 12:22:45 PM
Plus, polling is indicating that the Ayers attacks actually hurt McCain.
10/15/2008 12:34:18 PM
10/15/2008 12:39:01 PM
How's that?Maybe most people just see through the stupidity of the attack.The fact that you can't is indicative of your bias.
10/15/2008 1:38:25 PM
i heard all that same shit about rev wright when that was supposedly nothing...until obama was 'forced' to cut ties with him and then condemn the main father figure in his life...just bam, 20 years of being a spiritual leader, and then kicked to the curb after some soundclips showed who he truly was...and then all the obama supporters jumped on that bandwagon when the dalai bama gave them the signal, and proceeded to not condone wright's comments any longerbut please, call me biased for questioning the past relationship of a man who wants to be the next president of the US, and a man who was content in bombing US govt buildings...you're enlightened enough to see through the "stupidity" of the attack...]
10/15/2008 1:56:47 PM
^^ exactlythe Wright attack had more substance than these Ayers attacks.The Ayers attacks are so baseless and ridiculous, McCain would be an idiot to try and bring it up during the debate.McCain has tried the character attacks in the past 2 debates and failed miserably. He should really try and explain why he thinks his health care plan and tax plan are better for America. At worst, he can't lose ground if he does this well.
10/15/2008 1:58:22 PM
10/15/2008 2:03:00 PM
^ haha that statement is not disingenuous at all.
10/15/2008 2:04:26 PM
i'm just gonna stop....obama supporters cannot be reasoned with...they think he has done no wrong...theres no point in continuing this...holla
10/15/2008 2:05:34 PM
ha, i can certainly see the media bias towards obama, and against mccain. but honestly, sometimes mccain just steps in it
10/15/2008 2:06:16 PM
^^ I read that as you admitting defeating and walking away with your tail between your legs.I accept your concession.
10/15/2008 2:07:11 PM
call it whatever you want to call it, thats what obama supporters do anyway
10/15/2008 2:09:00 PM
^but wait...you're back? [Edited on October 15, 2008 at 2:16 PM. Reason : asdf]
10/15/2008 2:16:29 PM
Twista just can't stop going back on his word in this thread.
10/15/2008 2:18:10 PM
where did i say i was leaving the thread? i said i was abandoning the argument, which i did (reading comprehension FTL)thanks for proving my point about obama supporters calling things (stopping an argument i can't win) whatever they want to call them (leaving the thread forever)but fuck that, lets take some cheap shots at treetwista since he isnt in love with obama]
10/15/2008 2:43:58 PM
Idiots gave advice and sloth it gave no answer.
10/15/2008 2:46:33 PM
Semantic quibbling + intellectual dishonestyTwista's calling cards
10/15/2008 2:46:37 PM
constantly trolling non obama supporters while calling them out for trollingnutsmackr, mcdanger, etc's calling cardsof course you both could prove me wrong by talking about the debates instead of talking about TreeTwista10...]
10/15/2008 2:48:09 PM
Where the honor of the day is don't listen, attack
10/15/2008 2:49:38 PM
well thats kind of how presidential debates work nowadays
10/15/2008 2:54:19 PM
nothings forgiven in the four corners of hell.
10/15/2008 3:01:42 PM
are those markov chains?
10/15/2008 3:54:27 PM
10/15/2008 4:06:18 PM
10/15/2008 4:09:31 PM
^ this guy's a retad
10/15/2008 4:11:33 PM
anyone who doesn't pledge their undying affection to obama is a retard, amirite
10/15/2008 4:12:22 PM
^^no, thats not true actually[Edited on October 15, 2008 at 4:13 PM. Reason : ]
10/15/2008 4:12:52 PM
nah, he really is a retard, i heard about him. dude's dumb as fuck
10/15/2008 4:12:54 PM
no i dont think you did actuallydo you make up lies habitually?[Edited on October 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM. Reason : ]
10/15/2008 4:13:32 PM
I'm surprised you know such a large word, how long have you been working on your undergrad degree now?
10/15/2008 4:14:51 PM
ill have a diploma with a double major from the same university as youbut somehow weve gone off course of what really matters here[Edited on October 15, 2008 at 4:17 PM. Reason : bttt]
10/15/2008 4:16:33 PM
you know just because youre black, doesnt mean youre obligated to vote for obama
10/15/2008 4:18:54 PM
10/15/2008 4:21:14 PM