User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » AI zealots credibility watch Page 1 [2], Prev  
TreeTwista10
Les Dewdisdog
149644 Posts
user info
edit post

The target="_blank" tag would be a nice touch

[Edited on September 5, 2025 at 2:24 PM. Reason : oh snap he is using them now ]

9/5/2025 2:24:01 PM

CaelNCSU
All American
7628 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"risk = hazard + outrage
"


If the house has a swimming pool and a gun the child instantly dies.

Modernity is hiding and moving risk. Executives not responsible for killing people. Normies can't be given responsibility for their own actions. Or pooling risk when you shouldn't across populations.

Like in the above example from Freakonomics, I'd wager if you dig in the swimming fatals are all super young, and the risk factor decreases dramatically as the kid gets better at swimming.

Quote :
"Children under the age of 5 are the most vulnerable group, accounting for 75% of all fatal pool- or spa-related drownings and 77% of nonfatal, emergency department-treated injuries "


So older than 6 you hit a huge drop off and it becomes more like 1 in 90k. The gun thing would be better done by homes and not guns and correcting for parent home/not home. Context matters.

[Edited on September 5, 2025 at 2:47 PM. Reason : a]

[Edited on September 5, 2025 at 2:48 PM. Reason : o]

9/5/2025 2:38:31 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
38968 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"For comparison, driving in the US results in 12 in 100,000 deaths (not including life changing injuries which arguably should probably be accounted), smoking something like 192 in 100,000 and the smoking companies lied about it for many years. 1 in 5 smokers can be expected to die in a lifetime as opposed to about 1 in 90 drivers (and the risk scales as you get older"


These are two things that absolutely need more regulation/avoidance! Driving regulations should almost definitely be stronger. Everybody speeds bc the penalties are so minor. Drivers kill pedestrian and get traffic violations instead of manslaughter. And they are both already age limited, for primary user anyway. Our society has also made it so a car is pretty much required anywhere in the US, people deal with more risk when faced with necessity. AI is not a necessity, yet anyway, so let's set up the proper regulations and responsibilities NOW before it becomes so ingrained it's impossible to peel back.

9/5/2025 3:28:51 PM

CaelNCSU
All American
7628 Posts
user info
edit post

^ broadly agree as long as it's not used to stamp out competitors and regulation isn't used to keep Zuck, Altman, and Elon as the new lords of the world.

9/6/2025 2:14:18 PM

CaelNCSU
All American
7628 Posts
user info
edit post

https://gabrielweinberg.com/p/ai-surveillance-should-be-banned

9/6/2025 3:32:00 PM

thegoodlife3
All American
40035 Posts
user info
edit post

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-bubble-building-spree-55ee6128

Quote :
"Spending on AI Is at Epic Levels. Will It Ever Pay Off?

Tech companies pour hundreds of billions into data centers, taking on heavy debt, but current revenue is relatively tiny; echoes of dot-com bubble

This week, consultants at Bain & Co. estimated the wave of AI infrastructure spending will require $2 trillion in annual AI revenue by 2030.

By comparison, that is more than the combined 2024 revenue of Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Nvidia, and more than five times the size of the entire global subscription software market.
Morgan Stanley estimates that last year there was around $45
billion of revenue for AI products.

The sector makes money from a combination of subscription fees for chatbots such as ChatGPT and money paid to use these companies' data centers.

How the tech sector will cover the gap is "the trillion dollar question," said Mark Moerdler, an analyst at Bernstein."


Quote :
"*The AI boom = one of the costliest building sprees in world history

* Past 3 years' commitments are greater than the cost of building the U.S. interstate highway system

* Consumers must spend $800 billion on AI within a few years, to justify investment from 2023-24"


https://bsky.app/profile/mims.bsky.social/post/3lzqmcknerc2m

[Edited on September 26, 2025 at 1:58 PM. Reason : .]

9/26/2025 1:58:23 PM

The Coz
Tempus Fugitive
28278 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm certainly not going to pay for a service for which I haven't found a valuable personal use case while "free".

9/26/2025 5:57:31 PM

rwoody
Save TWW
38968 Posts
user info
edit post

https://www.404media.co/openais-sora-2-copyright-infringement-machine-features-nazi-spongebobs-and-criminal-pikachus/

10/1/2025 8:40:16 PM

moron
All American
35124 Posts
user info
edit post

As a software engineer I’m spending about $100/month on ai

Easily my most expensive monthly service at this point

10/1/2025 10:41:28 PM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » AI zealots credibility watch Page 1 [2], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2025 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.