Quote :

"What's ironic is that the people who believe in Creationism support survival of the fittest through free market solutions."

Except in many cases, they don't.

What is ironic is that many of the people who believe in evolution also believe that the government (made up of individuals, and only quasi-representing the people) can manage ridiculously complex economies.

4/10/2012 4:05:17 PM

[Edited on April 10, 2012 at 5:51 PM. Reason : n/m]

4/10/2012 5:51:05 PM

I'm going to disagree with your statement then make a statement just as broad and stereotypical as yours!

4/10/2012 7:13:47 PM

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-population-control-holocaust

This is kind of funny, just how everything population control is taken to equal eugenics and stuff. Some people just don't like the term.

4/16/2012 1:00:25 PM

Does this week's decision mean that we might soon hear about the new regulations and taxes that represent the coming of real population control.

educate yourself about this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21

6/29/2012 4:03:47 PM

Meh. More trees. Less humans.

6/29/2012 4:40:34 PM

"New World" Order.


Old World as you know it ends December 21, 2012.

6/29/2012 4:42:19 PM

Is that what the aliens told you?

6/29/2012 6:34:39 PM

No, that's what the world is telling me.

7/1/2012 1:20:34 AM

06.22 - 06.29

Nepal 06.18?

Does not compute!

7/1/2012 7:39:09 PM

Video from the 150,000 Tokyo protest

"I bring you another special report from Tokyo. The Ghost Letter Reports was on the scene for a Anti-Nuclear protest in central Tokyo which quickly grew from 60,000 to well over 150,000 people in a matter of several minutes." Historic Anti-Nuclear Protest In Tokyo. June 29th 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTV2CrGPI80&feature=youtu.be

7/3/2012 1:09:32 PM

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/30/world/asia/thousands-in-tokyo-protest-the-restarting-of-a-nuclear-plant.html?_r=1

Quote :

"Estimates of the crowd’s size varied widely, with organizers claiming 150,000 participants, while the police put the number at 17,000. Local news media estimated the crowd at between 20,000 and 45,000, which they described as the largest protest in central Tokyo since the 1960s. "

^ and you believe them?

7/3/2012 1:32:33 PM

Quote :

"Local news media estimated the crowd at between 20,000 and 45,000"

The only thing I believe is
1) people suck at counting
2) there were a sizable amount of people in the protest.

[Edited on July 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM. Reason : .]

7/3/2012 4:41:54 PM

What will the new world look like?

Help me envision the future, oh Genie Sex Boy.

7/6/2012 10:37:58 AM

1984

7/6/2012 1:14:53 PM

7/6/2012 1:44:30 PM

Bush 1991 NWO Speech



http://youtu.be/7a9Syi12RJo





You don't think Obama is part of the NWO?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grqWQIcNsNY&feature=player_embedded#!



[Edited on July 6, 2012 at 1:57 PM. Reason : .]

7/6/2012 1:50:40 PM

Oh, are you one of those now?

7/6/2012 2:06:45 PM

but is Obama with the NWO Black and White? or the Wolfpac?



or

7/6/2012 2:14:29 PM

Quote :

"Oh, are you one of those now?"

Depends on what you mean by "one of those"

Do I believe in the actually news clips of the presidents talking? Yes.
Do I care about the music and other bs that people added to the video? No.

Either way, you're going to blow it off and laugh because you're "one of those" people.

7/6/2012 2:18:42 PM

Quote :

"Do I believe in the actually news clips of the presidents talking? Yes."

do you actually believe in using the correct word?

7/6/2012 2:24:28 PM

So tell us all about the NWO. I'd love to know more.

7/6/2012 2:26:22 PM

Basically, Hulk Hogan is a punk-ass bitch and whichever side Sting is on is going to run shit.

7/6/2012 2:52:42 PM

I doubt you'll read it, but here is your answer because sometimes the answer to something this big is TL;DR.


http://www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/chronologies/cuddy-nwo.htm


this is written by Dennis Cuddy.

Quote :

" Dennis Cuddy received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education. Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. He has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch. "

7/6/2012 3:09:10 PM

I'll certainly read it, though I was hoping that you would actually articulate your opinion on it instead of posting a link.

7/6/2012 3:32:24 PM

^^ that is an extraordinarily worthless quote.

7/6/2012 3:49:27 PM

^^ Dude, wtf??? That was not written by David Cuddy.

Quote :

"Arranged and Edited by John Loeffler "

Do you see why no one takes you seriously when you lie like that?

7/6/2012 3:55:44 PM

A Chronological History of the New World Order

by D. L. Cuddy, Ph.D.

Arranged and Edited by John Loeffler

7/6/2012 3:57:20 PM

You are a literal retard.

7/6/2012 4:08:49 PM

I'm the literal retard?

because you can't read?

7/6/2012 4:12:05 PM

Quote :

"Senate set to approve controversial UN gun treaty As the United Nations prepares its final push to ratify a controversial gun treaty, the U.S. Senate is set to approve the measure which critics say will not only give away U.S. sovereignty but directly attack the individual gun rights of American citizens, according to a report published Thursday at Stand Up America. Democrats still hold the majority in the Senate. Known as "the U.N. small arms treaty," the measure would regulate private gun ownership, according to firearms rights watchdog groups. Retired Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who has been at the forefront of citizen opposition to the treaty, stated, There has been a decree by the administration by the president and the secretary of state saying that our president will sign the United Nations small arms treaty, which is about how we will buy sell and control individual private weapons,” Boykin warned. “That means the United Nations, an international body will decide how you and I as Americans can buy and sell our weapons, how we control those weapons, who is authorized to have those weapons and where they are. This is a dangerous trend. The treaty has been in the works for several years, and both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have expressed full support for the measure, which critics say is an underhanded attempt to implement massive gun control without having to go through the normal legislative process in Congress. Obama stated during the 2008 presidential campaign that he would not seek to push gun control through Congress due to the fact that he does not have the votes. And on that point he is correct. Gun control has fallen on hard times in America over the past two decades. Increasingly states are enacting laws that give citizens greater leeway in self defense, many approving bills that allow citizens to carry guns either openly or concealed without having a permit from the state. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in two monumental cases in 2008 and 2010 that most of the anti-gun laws in the District of Columbia and in Chicago were unconstitutional. The ruling also clarified the definition of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, stating that the right to bear arms is an individual rather than a "collective" right. Thus, known gun opponents such as Obama and Hillary Clinton immediately went to work to devise plans, under the radar, to attempt to change the tide of public opinion about firearms and implement gun control without the approval of Congress, according to government whistleblowers and watchdogs. One plan was to send U.S. firearms to Mexican drug cartels as a means of padding statistics that would "prove" the administration's contention that "90 percent of the firearms used by the cartels come from the United States." The other plan was to bypass Congress and use the U.N. to trump U.S. law by signing a treaty that would grant international supervision over the sale and possession of guns in America. But the plans have been met by heavy opposition. Congress has exposed the scheme inherent in the Fast and Furious operation, leading to contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder. Hillary Clinton has been implicated in the scandal as one of the original masterminds behind the scheme. And over 130 members of Congress have openly expressed their opposition to the U.N. small arms treaty. The Senate is also considering another U.N. based treaty called "The Law of the Sea," which is intended to regulate international waterways but would hand over U.S. sovereignty to international entities, according to critics. President Reagan refused to approve the treaty in 1982 due to sovereignty issues. But Obama and Hillary Clinton have pushed for its ratification. Both bills have created a firestorm of controversy due to their encroachment on the Bill of Rights and the final authority of Congress to regulate international commerce. According to the U.S. Constitution, only Congress has the authority to regulate international commerce pertaining to the United States, and thus, critics say that the treaties are blatantly unconstitutional. Proponents of the bills often engage in what opponents say is "Orwellian newspeak" in their frantic attempts to get the treaties approved. The Law of the Sea Treaty, for example, is being promoted as a method of "protecting U.S. sovereignty" in spite of the fact that it does nothing of the sort. And the small arms treaty is promoted as having nothing to do with individual gun rights but is rather an attempt to address gun sales by "rogue nations." But the gun treaty applies directly to the United States and lumps the nation together with so called "rogue nations." Thus, the treaty would directly impact gun sales in the U.S. and by extension the gun rights of individual citizens. http://www.examiner.com/article/senate-set-to-approve-controversial-un-gun-treaty "

Closer to New World Order or Closer to freedom, liberty, and American values?

7/8/2012 4:32:17 PM

A whole lot of unnamed critics and opponents in that article by Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner.

Quote :

"As an original foot-soldier in 'the Reagan Revolution' that led to the election of Ronald Reagan, Anthony G. Martin is no stranger to politics, particularly in the state of his birth, South Carolina."

For a guy who describes himself as "no stranger to politics", it's not real clear that Anthony G. Martin knows how our government works.

7/8/2012 4:43:19 PM

It's coming faster than you can imagine.

Obama Signs Executive Order To Control All Communications During A Crisis


Executive order on the whitehouse.gov webpage:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/06/executive-order-assignment-national-security-and-emergency-preparedness-

[Edited on July 9, 2012 at 12:10 AM. Reason : ..]

7/9/2012 12:08:11 AM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-garrison/martial-law-under-another_b_1370819.html

it was only a few months ago that they issued one that asserts that, in a crisis (as defined/determined by the sitting administration), the president has the "authority to commandeer all U.S. domestic resources, including food and water, as well as seize all energy and transportation infrastructure inside the borders of the United States."

apparently, most people are confident these gestures are benign, but I'm more suspicious.

[Edited on July 9, 2012 at 2:09 AM. Reason : ...]

7/9/2012 2:06:44 AM

^I see someone is awake

7/9/2012 3:11:54 AM

^^^^^it would appear that this is how they will take away our guns. Hopefully the senate isn't dumb enough to actually ratify this.

7/10/2012 8:39:31 AM

^not sure that you understand that the United Nations OWNS the senate. OWNS the presidency, and (proven by the healthcare ruling) OWNS the judicial branch.

The United Nation was founded and funded by the Rockefeller family and the other global rich elite.
Rockefeller even donated the land that UN headquarters rests on.

Rockefeller and the others are the people that make up the board of the Federal Reserve.

The Federal Reserve is making our money worthless on purpose by starting wars and creating money. This is the fastest method to collapse the richest country in the world. How do we know they want to make the money worthless? The color on the bills match monopoly money (Every square inch of monetary unit is designed and approved. There are no accidents in the design of our money. Winning the lottery has a better odds than having the colors match monopoly money coincidentally.

Now we know the small group of rich elite own the Federal Reserve, own washington, and own the United Nation. We also know George HW Bush said to the American people in 1991 that a New World Order would be achieved through the United States and that they would be successful.



[Edited on July 10, 2012 at 12:33 PM. Reason : .]

7/10/2012 12:13:52 PM

Quote :

"How do we know they want to make the money worthless? The color on the bills match monopoly money (Every square inch of monetary unit is designed and approved. There are no accidents in the design of our money. Winning the lottery has a better odds than having the colors match monopoly money coincidentally."

are you freakin' serious man? now i know you're bat-shit crazy.

7/10/2012 1:02:55 PM

I've been collecting coins since I was 8. Call me bat-shit crazy again.

7/10/2012 1:11:57 PM

7/10/2012 1:24:31 PM

^^wtf are you talking about (again)?

7/10/2012 1:48:37 PM

You're not a baby, I don't need to spoonfeed you what I'm talking about in that EASY sentence.

7/10/2012 1:54:59 PM

sorry brother, collecting coins is not analogous to claiming that the similiarities in color of U.S. and monopoly money is proof that the Federal Reserve is trying to make our money worthles.

7/10/2012 1:57:34 PM

You're right. Get ready to follow the logic brick road.

Given #1:
I've been collecting coins since I was 8. ->
I have experience and 22 years of passion in currency ->
I know there are no accidents in the design of our money (even the reeds (ridges) have a specific purpose)

Given #2
monopoly money colors came FIRST

Given #2a
Money under the Federal Reserve was never colored before. If color was meant for security, they would have colorized $100 bills, but they didn't.

Given #3
Monopoly money is worthless

Given #4


Given #5


Prove: Federal Reserve is trying to make our money worthless symbolized by matching colors of monopoly money.

1. The bills were given colors on purpose for a symbolic purpose Reason: Given #1, #2a
2. Monopoly money has long been the term for worthless money Reason: Given #3
3. The Federal Reserve gave legal tender monopoly color. Reason Given #4 , #5

Therefore, the Federal Reserve is trying to make our money worthless symbolized by matching colors of monopoly money.


Is it true?
They are printing absurd amount of money and it defies logic.
They created the United Nations
They fund the United Nations
The United States has lost and unaccounted for trillions of dollars using the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan using the United Nations to declare war.



[Edited on July 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM. Reason : .]

7/10/2012 2:33:16 PM

Holy fuck that looks like a shit ton of stupid.

not. reading.

7/10/2012 2:43:00 PM

Quote :

"How do we know they want to make the money worthless? The color on the bills match monopoly money (Every square inch of monetary unit is designed and approved. There are no accidents in the design of our money. Winning the lottery has a better odds than having the colors match monopoly money coincidentally."

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

7/10/2012 2:45:25 PM

Quote :

"That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard."

Better be. That's what he's going for, and I'd say he's succeeded.

7/10/2012 2:48:51 PM

The world is round.



Keep calling me crazy and stupid for calling the world round.


you can call facts stupid as much as you want, truth doesn't cater to your dumbasses.

7/10/2012 2:52:37 PM

Your "logic" isn't "logic" at all.

It's a neat conspiracy theory, and it's pretty weird how the colors of new bills are the color of monoploy money.

but just because it's a fact that they're similar in colors does not lead to the conslusion that the FR is trying to make our money worthless. How you jump to that conclusion is beyond me.

^as usual, that's completely irrelevant. it is a fact that the world is round, yes. but you haven't presented a single fact in your FR consipiracy theory.

[Edited on July 10, 2012 at 2:55 PM. Reason : ]

7/10/2012 2:53:32 PM

LOOK AT YOUR FUCKING MONEY.

ARE YOU COLOR BLIND?

7/10/2012 2:55:35 PM