9/17/2010 3:18:11 PM
I wasn't implying they should be OTC. I was pointing out that law enforcement has bigger fish to fry. However, now I will say that the situations you presented don't seem realistic. I don't think mildly relaxing perscription drug laws would harm instead of help people who need those drugs.
9/17/2010 3:51:02 PM
Here is the deal because there is a lot of misinformation here1. DHHS maintains control of the database, no one accesses it without its permission.2. There are currently 21 SBI agents with access to the database and they are in the Diversion and Environmental Crime unit. They contact DHHS who then looks up the information and decides what relevant information, if any is/should to be passed along to the SBI agent. the SBI agents have to let the Attorney General know that they are requesting this information3. Sheriffs currently have access to this database without a warrant. Currently they have to contact one of the 21 SBI agents and have them make the request to DHHS to turn over the information. The Sheriffs are asking for permission to sidestep the SBI and ask themselves. The Janitors, Secretaries, etc cannot gain access. 4. DHHS has to approve every request for the information and the request as to be part of a "need-to-know" investigation in which either the SBI or local law enforcement has an active investigation going on.5. You can gain access to your own record through a "right-to-know" request and the information will be turned over to you.6. Courts and licensing boards can gain access to the database with a court order7. It is only for opioids and other drugs that are rife for abuse. What antibiotics you are taking won't show up, your valtrex prescription won't show up.8. Doctors and Pharmacists aren't handing the information over to the local police for their habitual script shoppers. They have access to prevent providing scripts to script shoppers.9. Prescription drug abuse and the crimes and deaths associated with it are taking up more and more of local police time. It isn't as simple as someone wants to take a percocet, who gives a shit. The associated property and personal crimes to feed the habit are a big issue. There is absolutely no way someone would be able to just go through trolling for information about neighbors and what drugs they are on.[Edited on September 17, 2010 at 9:15 PM. Reason : .]
9/17/2010 9:01:21 PM
I'm glad these pricks can look up that I'm currently taking percocet for my recent surgery
9/17/2010 9:07:32 PM
They can't. But thanks for that uninformed rant. Also, this isn't a left/right issue. This is part of the model code and is found in a large number of US States. PDMP isn't limited to North Carolina.
9/17/2010 9:11:56 PM
I still say this list shouldn't exist at all.
9/17/2010 11:42:25 PM
9/20/2010 2:06:31 PM
the idea that we should be willing to "give a little liberty to gain a little security" is flawed. always has been, always will be. shit like this:
9/20/2010 2:29:03 PM
9/20/2010 7:27:48 PM
It's a shame that the problem has been pushed onto the local sheriffs when it would be easier to deal with in higher levels of government. I sympathize with them when so many people OD on prescription drugs. I'm sure they want to help, but this is really something that needs to be tackled by state and federal authorities. No offense to the Wake County Sheriffs Department, but they don't need to know every prescription a motorist has been given to do their job IMO.
9/20/2010 10:48:05 PM
This is why marijuana needs to be legalized.Maybe even make hydrocodone/acetaminophen combinations available in low dosages without a prescription.You all realize that a prescription isn't required to purchase tramadol, right? It's just that no pharmacy will sell it you without a prescription. (SPOILER: INTERNET PHARMACIES!)
9/21/2010 1:51:58 AM
^^^You made a claim and I'm asking for evidence.
9/21/2010 8:52:15 AM
You need to learn who to write concise, coherrent sentences.Are you asking how this database will be utililized to stop personal and property crimes?Your question makes absolutely no sense.
9/21/2010 11:22:49 AM
You made a claim w/o evidence. I quoted that claim, then said my perception was the exact opposite and asked you to "enlighten me". In other words: tell my why your perception, the one I quoted, is right and mine is wrong. Why is this difficult to understand?In yet other words, how do you come to the following conclusions:"Prescription drug abuse and the crimes and deaths associated with it are taking up more and more of local police time""The associated property and personal crimes to feed the habit are a big issue"
9/21/2010 11:31:16 AM
9/23/2010 11:49:53 AM
OK thats exactly what I was looking for, though some of it is beside the point.
9/23/2010 12:57:27 PM
http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/8640124/A Raleigh police officer was arrested Tuesday on charges that he posed as a dead man to get a prescription painkiller.Julian St. Clair King, 26, of 106 Bermuda Green Drive, Durham, is charged with two counts of attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud.Jim Sughrue, a spokesman for the Raleigh Police Department, said in a statement that a police investigation found that King used his position as a police officer to get information about a prescription for a controlled substance while responding to a death on Oct. 10.
11/17/2010 5:23:18 PM
That has nothing to do with the database.
11/17/2010 11:40:43 PM
You can't even trust cops to glance at the pill bottles on your nightstand, much less have unfettered access to your medical records.
11/18/2010 12:14:26 AM
And they aren't given unfettered access.
11/18/2010 8:29:02 AM