5/8/2010 6:54:17 PM
Ok - here's the hint.I know it seems like you can figure it out in your head. Instead, work it out on paper. Then read the question again very critically.
5/8/2010 7:42:43 PM
Wow, the solution is really subtle, almost to the point of being unfair.
5/8/2010 8:19:08 PM
[Edited on May 9, 2010 at 9:10 PM. Reason : hmm]
5/9/2010 9:09:58 PM
potential daughter ages / house numbers1 2 18 = 211 3 12 = 161 4 9 = 141 6 6 can't be this one, because there would be 2 older "daughters"?2 2 9 = 132 3 6 = 113 3 4 = 10
5/9/2010 9:29:15 PM
Right, so that suggests the answer is supposed to be 2, 2, and 9. I figured that out before internetting, but I still take issue with the solution. It's like they've never heard of "Irish twins" (siblings born between 9-12 months apart); there would still be an "oldest" child, but it would be the same age in years as the second oldest.
5/10/2010 11:41:46 AM
I don't understand. moron's answers are all possible (minus the one he scratched out). Why does the answer have to be 2,2, and 9? if it's any combination above, the rules are all met...explain?
5/10/2010 2:39:15 PM
If it were any of the other combination of numbers the woman wouldn't need "one more piece of information." The only sum (and house number) that repeats is 13 (1+6+6 and 2+2+9). Thus the extra fact that they have an "oldest" daughter (as ^^ points out, supposedly) rules out the 1+6+6 combination.
5/10/2010 3:07:17 PM
ahh, ok
5/10/2010 3:26:39 PM
the perpetualness of this thread has not run out has it?
12/11/2010 6:48:54 AM