2
2/8/2009 7:13:13 PM
at least he admitted to it todayinteresting, this is HR leaders in the American League during that time span he spoke of
2/9/2009 2:56:42 PM
2/9/2009 2:59:18 PM
so who is the best legitimate player of this generation?Manny? (is he legit?)Chipper?Smoltz?Maddux?Griffey (even with injuries?)
2/9/2009 3:04:50 PM
2/9/2009 3:08:55 PM
Griffey by far.All those injuries and he still managed 611 homers?? Ridiculous. He would have been far above Bonds, Aaron, and Ruth by now if he had stayed healthy. Best player not only of our generation, but probably EVER.He has 2680 hits, 1772 RBI (while on crappy teams in Seattle and Cincinatti that never had runners on base), and was an all-star (close to a 30-100 season) in his 19th year as a pro. You just can't beat that.[Edited on February 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM. Reason : -]
2/9/2009 3:09:28 PM
Mad Dog or Pedro baby
2/9/2009 3:09:49 PM
who gives a crapif they were all juicing, it levels out the playing field
2/9/2009 3:16:44 PM
Pujols has been incredibly consistent, and from all accounts he is clean. I'd be upset, but not surprised to find out that guys like Pujols, Chipper, and especially Griffey were doing roids.
2/9/2009 3:18:15 PM
Griffey wouldnt have been hurt if he was taking, they actually help your joints and your system recover much faster than at a normal rate. Steroids dont just automatically make you hit it further and higher...its with your workout and fatigue rate as well as recovery.you cant just take them and expect it to be like Popeye you have to work still...as for
2/9/2009 3:23:04 PM
2/9/2009 4:44:16 PM
2/9/2009 5:10:40 PM
2/9/2009 5:15:41 PM
DefinitelyBut you said
2/9/2009 5:28:41 PM
well let me say that I SHOULD have included...hurt nearly as longgggggg or badly or anything like thati agree tho, Maddox may be the #1 guy...or possibly a few others.Ive always thought Jim Thome had to be on something as well.
2/9/2009 5:31:34 PM
2/9/2009 5:41:07 PM
jesus christ, I'm watching the interview on Sportscenter right now and I wish I had a dollar for every time A-Roid has said "it was a different era"
2/9/2009 6:12:39 PM
exactlyPeter Gammons pussied out of the interview.PG: so it was only 2001, 2002, 2003?A-Rod: pretty much yesPG: pretty much??? so when did it start and end Alex? lets move on, what substances did you take?A-Rod: it was a different era. it was a different era. i don't really know what I tookPG: so you don't know what you had taken, ingested, injected??? how did you know it wasn't cocaine? who gave you the substances?A-Rod: it was a different era. it was a different era.talk about some hard hitting questions there, no followup, it was like a damn A-Rod apology session
2/9/2009 11:38:30 PM
2/9/2009 11:40:42 PM
Agreed on the interview being soft, but at least he came out and straight up took responsibility for at least some of what he did. I'm not dumb enough to think we heard the whole story there, but thats a hell of a lot more information than he had to give, and its a hell of a lot more than anyone before him gave when they were busted.
2/9/2009 11:42:26 PM
I feel like A-Rod was going to spill a LOT more if PG had pushed the issue. Hell, A-Rod nearly said that management forced him to take steroids during his initial answer.reaffirmed is my belief that ESPN is a below average reporting network, and certainly isn't a credible news organization[Edited on February 9, 2009 at 11:49 PM. Reason : .]
2/9/2009 11:48:39 PM
2/10/2009 12:03:48 AM
so was this during the jerry narron years? im too lazy to look
2/10/2009 2:26:19 AM
2/10/2009 3:34:50 AM
2/10/2009 7:40:28 AM
2/10/2009 10:39:38 AM
Post your new A-Roid names here:lolA Fraud
2/10/2009 10:41:49 AM
While on the topic of steroids...http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090210/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/tejada_steroidsTejada charged with lying to Congress
2/10/2009 3:41:22 PM
Congress wasting their time investigating steroids in baseball was bad enough when the economy was decent
2/10/2009 3:45:15 PM
A-hole, cover of the ny post Ahahahah
2/10/2009 6:02:12 PM
2/10/2009 9:00:20 PM
5% of 4 million males with clinical hypogonadism recieve treatment. Only indicated uses are delayed puberty and male hypogonadism, in addition to certian metastatic breast cancers in females. Where are you getting that figure? you may be right, I can't find it anywhere, and I have an academic medical center's entire library resources at my fingertips. Plus, I agreed with you that testosterone and GH can be used to treat HIV associated cachexia. What are you trying to prove? Just last week, we I had it pounded into my head that GH administration does not improve end of life outcome for weak/feeble patients. There is theoretical value to its administration, including testosterone replacement in the elderly male population, and it may very well be prescribed quite commonly, but find me the sources where its proven and I'll shut up. I'm not spewing off here. If I'm wrong, back it up with some facts. I'm not being disrespectful, and I'd like to know. As a matter of fact, PM me, these people don't want to read this garbage.
2/11/2009 7:28:05 PM