nuance. ha! I love it. Does nuance mean saying you could never disown a man and then doing it a couple weeks later? Or does it mean saying you will accept and abide by public financing, and then fail to do so later when it seems you can raise a hell of a lot more? Or maybe nuance means saying you'll meet without preconditions one day and then getting indignant the next when someone asks you about it.or is it "i voted for it before I voted against it?" [Edited on September 5, 2008 at 4:11 PM. Reason : ]
9/5/2008 4:11:03 PM
Interesting interview. I thought Oreilly was quite easy on Obama, but I also thought Obama did pretty well in the interview. (You lefty nuts would NEVER say that if McCain did something that you thought was decent).
9/5/2008 4:17:11 PM
that's cause McCain never does anything decent, AMIRITE?
9/5/2008 4:18:07 PM
9/5/2008 4:27:39 PM
9/5/2008 4:27:52 PM
HOLY FUCK!!!!! OBAMA IS GOING TO TAKE US TO WAR WITH IRAN!!DIDN"T YOU HEAR HIM SAID IT?? HE SAID HE WOULD NOT TAKE THE MILITARY OPTION OFF THE TABLE!!!> AND THAT"S EXACTLY WHAT JOHN MCCAIN SAYS!!! AND EVERYONE KNOWS JOHN MCCAIN WILL TAKE US TO WAR WITH IRAN!!!OH NOOOOOSsssssss!
9/5/2008 5:16:27 PM
why do you hate freedom
9/5/2008 5:19:21 PM
9/5/2008 7:03:03 PM
9/5/2008 7:05:11 PM
^ That may have been true once upon a time, but McCain has long since given up on those times. And I don't think McCain was reaching across the aisle so much as he was a closet leftist (which is why the republicans hated him until he became the nominee).When you think about it, if there were someone that came anywhere close to Obama's positions where he could reach them half-way, they wouldn't call themselves a republican (this goes the other way too).
9/5/2008 7:46:58 PM
9/6/2008 9:57:34 AM
9/6/2008 3:40:45 PM
tonight we learned:energy plan: obama is going to spend 150 billion on venture capitalists in the form of tax rebates over a 10 year period on solar/ hydro/ wind/ geothermal. he didn't say he was going to build any nuclear plants and he said he def wouldn't drill in ANWR or do any new drilling (in the wake of opec ruining the world by cutting production to raise prices. damn them)european relationships: he said that we need to strengthen our relationship with germany and defended his european trip. he's going to engage in "deliberate diplomacy"more on national security: defends the missile shield in poland but "only if it works right". but didn't outrightly support the missile shield.agrees that putin is a huge problem. agreed with oreilly that europe is "sweet and cowardly" at the moment. obama pointed out that russias stock market took a huge beating for invading georgia and that invading or attack other european countries will be painful for russia economically.finally: oreilly challenged obama to a one-on-one basketball game. first one to score 11 points.obama said that oreilly has a height advantage but that he would have the speed advantage. i bet it would be a good game. i doubt obama will actually play him though.
9/10/2008 11:41:01 PM
did obama say his black half would have the slashing advantage and his white half would have the stop and pop advantage?
9/10/2008 11:44:58 PM
^ I don't know what those terms mean, but I laughed.
9/10/2008 11:47:30 PM
right now, my vote goes to the candidate who plans to build the most nuclear power plants, and the candidate who lowers my tax burden the mostright now the winnar = mccain/palin. if obama were to come out and raise my taxes BUT also plan to build 150 new nuclear plants, he'd easily get my vote and i'd come out batting hard for obama on the forums. but oh well. that doesn't look like its gonna happen
9/10/2008 11:53:30 PM
slashing = driving to basketstop and pop = stop and take a jump shot
9/10/2008 11:57:57 PM
^^^^WTF?!?!Why did he say that?
9/11/2008 7:30:28 AM
I think Oreilly really missed an opportunity in the section when they were talking about taxes. Bill was telling him how wealth redistribution is socialist.. and Obama said, "If im doing well, and my neighbor isnt. Shouldnt I help him?"Bill didnt say anything.. But I was screaming at the TV. Obama has every right to help his neighbor. What he doesnt have the right is to take from YOU to give it to his neighbor. You can do whatever the hell you want with your time and money, you have that right. Just dont think you have a right to others time and possesions and Im cool.
9/11/2008 9:58:56 AM
Well that's what society is becoming.Countless studies show that people who were born to a single parent, or that grow up without a father make more excuses and have less mental capacity to deal with challenges in all professions later in life. (just look at what happened to vince young this week, the qb for the titans)Hence, when somebody comes along and is literally going to cluster-rape the rich of all their fortunes and earnings sounds very appealing.But make no mistake. It will hurt society in so many ways. Just like a perfectly "equal" communist society hurts any form of innovation and hard work ethic.
9/11/2008 1:55:01 PM
For once... I think I actually might agree with what csharp is saying... Not that there's any solution to the child-raising issue he mentioned, or if it's even something that can be morally "solved", but for the most part he's right.Am I going insane? Should I be worried? Or might it be that for once he has actually said something with some degree of intelligence?As for the Obama interview, I thought he stood up pretty well, though Bill didn't exactly pound him with tough questions. It'll help his case towards rational people, but given Bill's semi-negative tone throughout the whole thing, the target audience of Fox News (people who like to be spoon-fed opinions) probably won't have changed their opinion on him at all.[Edited on September 11, 2008 at 2:01 PM. Reason : .]
9/11/2008 1:59:58 PM
speaking of guilt by associationhttp://thesuperficial.com/2008/09/anne_hathaway_raffaello_follie.php
9/11/2008 5:31:29 PM
nevermind, what I just said was dumb[Edited on September 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM. Reason : .]
9/11/2008 5:42:39 PM
9/11/2008 6:26:41 PM
^relevant. Thanks I see no one ran to defend obama's socialist remarks. Progress?
9/11/2008 6:33:27 PM
9/11/2008 6:44:57 PM
SPARE ME THE PHONY OUTRAGE
9/11/2008 6:48:11 PM
I thought Obama did well. And I think the questions O'reilly asked were for the most part legit.Obama did confuse me on one point. When asked about his plans for dealing with Iran, he responded that he did not want to tip his hand to the opposition by answering that question. Which is fine, except for the fact that he plans a 16 month time table for withdraw from Iraq. Would that not be considered tipping your hand?I'm not critcizing him for that, I just wish he had clarrified what he meant. Of course O'reilly did not ask him about it so I don't hold that against him either. But other than that, I thought the interview went well.
9/11/2008 7:11:01 PM
last I checked, we were not occupying Iran. I think it's hilarious how some of you people think we can't talk about when or how we are going to leave Iraq because it might "tip our hand". It's as if we're supposed to stay with 150,000 troops, then wake up one morning and say surprise everyone with "hey guess what - we're leaving! we'll be gone by friday. Bet you didn't see that one coming!"
9/11/2008 7:32:34 PM
^ lol wut?
9/11/2008 9:09:16 PM