7/29/2008 10:08:28 AM
I may be guilty of being too conventional in my thinking, but the only way I could think of a very rapid battery recharge would either involve high-voltage transformers (which is an additional home expense), or at the very least, additional 220V outlets (which is still an expense to get installed - most folks only have 1-2 for their washer/dryer), or a process which would involve immense heat dissipation. I mean, sure, there's a few things I could think of - a good inductor/capacitor setup could easily store up large amounts of voltage for a quick discharge. (All of this, though, is some additional infrastructure on the home end, however.) But I'd worry about the heat dissipated across the battery if you did that as rapidly as we're talking about - P = IV. I would think that this, aside from being a hazard, it would have a negative effect upon the life of the battery.
7/29/2008 10:54:06 AM
TroleTacks, there are, and I have no doubt that if electric fueling stations pop up they will be utilized. However, installing a half-ton capacitor bank in ones home does not sound worth it, since it would be easy to just let the damn thing charge naturally. While I'm sure some people drive home to spend five minutes charging their car before driving off again, the vast majority of people do not and will not. It is a hybrid for a reason, burn the damn gasoline. So I would never buy a battery that can charge in five minutes but weighs more, holds less energy, and will wear out sooner. Now, if battery technology is surpassed by obsene-capacitor technology then sure, people will want to charge as fast as they can, but I believe utilities will insist on load levellers; for example, you hook up and then the utility varies the charge rate to be in-line with the power that is available without reverting to peaking stations. I think power companies would love this ability to choose when and where demand comes from, but it means you would probably never see a 5-minute charge between 9am and 9pm. [Edited on July 29, 2008 at 11:43 AM. Reason : .,.]
7/29/2008 11:34:28 AM
doesn't a 40 mile range mean that it can travel 80 miles?i know that's what "range" is for a boat
7/29/2008 5:00:13 PM
uhhh, no.
7/29/2008 5:03:17 PM
7/29/2008 7:21:24 PM