knock 'em down.
6/13/2008 12:30:09 PM
6/13/2008 12:38:55 PM
6/13/2008 12:42:46 PM
6/13/2008 12:56:39 PM
6/13/2008 1:16:46 PM
6/13/2008 2:16:20 PM
Its amazing you can so clearly see those boxes of ammo when they're all of 30 or 40 pixels wide in those super high resolution photos we've been provided withI'm still wondering why the type of ammo matters
6/13/2008 2:23:09 PM
:carl face:Yes, tree. I know that.This was obvious to everyone but you.
6/13/2008 2:27:55 PM
so why does the type of ammo matter?
6/13/2008 2:30:55 PM
6/13/2008 2:33:24 PM
so the ammo used in sub machine guns is more prone to regulation than the ammo that is used in handguns, even though its exactly the same ammo? i don't follow at all]
6/13/2008 2:35:37 PM
both hand guns and submachine guns are more likely to be regulated than hunting rifles.are you finally starting to see why your last 5 or so responses have been retarded?
6/13/2008 2:37:19 PM
how about M-16s? are they more likely to be banned?i just ask because i have a .223 hunting rifle...thats the same caliber as an M-16 btw]
6/13/2008 2:40:27 PM
Since when has an m-16 been a submachine gun?
6/13/2008 2:43:35 PM
so assault rifles arent likely to be banned, just smgs? thats a sigh of relief]
6/13/2008 2:44:18 PM
when did I ever mention assault rifles?
6/13/2008 2:45:04 PM
you didnt, but do you think they'd be likely to be banned?you seem adamant that hunting rifles would be fineall the while continuing to ignore the blatant fact that there are types and calibers of ammunition that work in the most deadly and dangerous guns, and the most accepted guns like hunting rifles and revolvers...i've already mentioned that there would be both handgun and rifle ammunition of a variety of calibers that could be bannedso why do you keep making distinctions about the type of ammo? is it because "those boxes are definitely rifle ammo"?]
6/13/2008 2:49:07 PM
I'll try to explain, again, where i stand on this and why by first stating what i think we can all agree on and where we differwe can all agree that...1. There are a lot of racists and the most vocal are rednecks2. The possibility of having a "black" prez is evoking more vocal racism around the country3. This has been well covered by news and people talk about it among themselves4. The threat to Obama's life has been discussed and is a sensitive topic and surely understood by all AmericansThen this guys decides to sell guns & ammo and call it an "Obama sale"whether he meant it for one thing or another is almost completely irrelavantits like having sears selling ovens and calling it a "Holocaust sale" cause they want to donate the proceeds to a charityit really doesnt matter what the intent is, the stupidity in making that reference is so damaging that it should automatically be condemned as grossly insensitivenow dont label me as being overly sensitive to racism, i supported Imus when he screwed up and many other cases, but this is an important issue and the man's life is at stake I think most reasonable people would realize it
6/13/2008 3:11:45 PM
6/13/2008 3:15:33 PM
What if they were selling bullets for people to fire in the air in celebration at Obama's inauguration?
6/13/2008 11:38:19 PM
^given McCain's views on illegal immigration it would seem that the activity you mention would be more aptly labeled a "McCain Sale".Going by movie stereotypes as it were.
6/13/2008 11:46:50 PM
^^yeah thats what it is
6/14/2008 2:31:37 PM
nastoute needs to calm down. I still have no idea what this sign means. Is it a fire saleIs it a statement about Obama being blackWhat the fuck does this mean?
6/14/2008 2:41:40 PM
If this sale is because of people being worried about a democratic president enacting stricter gun laws, why didn't it happen earlier? A democratic victory isn't substantially more or less likely now than it was a month ago. Why did they do it before the election anyway? It's not like the day Obama gets sworn in the ATF comes around and takes all your guns away. Why weren't there "Kerry Sales" four years ago? Why wasn't their a rush to buy guns then, or when the Democrats took back congress? Why isn't there something like this every single election in which a democrat could win?
6/14/2008 7:12:17 PM
Who's to say there aren't? The difference this time around is kerry didn't have people running around ever vigilant for racism. Clearly the original poster thought this was a big deal because he thinks some racist is going to assasinate obama because he's black. Would he have even found this picture if it was a Kerry sale?
6/14/2008 8:40:44 PM
Maybe it's just because more people have cell phone cameras these days vs. even 4 years ago (i know i didn't have a camera phone 4 years ago).I don't think it's anything as insidious as your mythical racism patrol going around to gun shows. If it IS racism (and i would be surprised if there wasn't at least some), then it's a bit despicable don't you think?
6/14/2008 8:47:25 PM
so is your question "is racism despicable?"
6/14/2008 9:26:35 PM
6/14/2008 9:53:42 PM
6/14/2008 9:54:55 PM
well, I'll just say that I trust my own judgement more than yours, especially on something i'm extremely knowledgeable about.
6/14/2008 9:56:17 PM
no offense...but how does the fact that you know more about guns make this obama sale any less distasteful in my eyes?
6/14/2008 9:57:21 PM
First, it's not just because I know more about guns....but I do think that my far greater familiarity with gun buyers and sellers, along with the history of gun control laws, buys me a little something in terms of properly interpreting this.
6/14/2008 10:00:24 PM
lol "properly interpreting"...yeah...[Edited on June 14, 2008 at 10:02 PM. Reason : agree to disagree...opinions are like assholes *sigh*]
6/14/2008 10:01:34 PM
6/14/2008 10:12:27 PM
6/14/2008 10:22:37 PM
6/14/2008 11:42:05 PM
the AWB was retarded on a staggering level.
6/14/2008 11:46:12 PM
but banning assault weapons can't ever be bad![Edited on June 14, 2008 at 11:47 PM. Reason : /]
6/14/2008 11:47:08 PM
yeah, that mindset is about the only explanation i can think of for it. i guess some people think "any increased restriction on guns is better than not having it." the AWB was stupid as shit even if you DID want to regulate "assault weapons", whatever that means.
6/14/2008 11:49:16 PM
Ya know, we had a democratic house and senate, yet after Virginia Tech, they didnt pass any new gun laws over it...Democrats are no more uniform on the gun issue than Republicans, most democrats who got elected in 2006 either were moderate ones and are neutral or pro-gun, or they replaced liberal Republicans who were anti-gun anyway.
6/14/2008 11:49:40 PM
i think some are legitimately not anti-gun (and a few are probably pro-gun). the rest realize that it isn't politically expedient, for the most part, and would rather expend political capital on other things.
6/14/2008 11:51:48 PM
I remember those peaceful years when would-be criminals couldn't buy new AR-15s with bayonet lugs and flash hiders.
6/15/2008 12:06:07 AM
6/15/2008 3:39:58 PM
I'm sure McCain will be at least a little more 2nd amendment friendly than Obama.In case that was your only voting issue... which would mean you just never vote democrat
6/15/2008 3:42:40 PM
6/15/2008 3:53:34 PM
6/15/2008 6:18:50 PM
pro-gun Obama supporters...LOL...hope you guys don't own any handguns or semi-automatic weapons in general]
6/16/2008 3:21:09 PM
I can see how someone might take this as a message to assassinate Obama, but it's quite a reach and I think that anyone who does take it that way is ignorant and/or paranoid. The only reason that the sign says Obama on it is because he's now the democratic nominee, if Hillary had won it would be a Hillary sale. He's simply playing on people's fears that a democrat will limit their access to firearms. Hell, when I went to a gun store back in February the owner was telling me how much his business had increased from people worried about a democrat getting elected and enacting gun control laws. I don't know if he was telling the truth or just trying to get me to buy something, but that's what I thought of when I saw this sign.
6/17/2008 1:40:34 AM
6/17/2008 10:30:09 PM
well, the Democratic Party doesn't have the best track record when it comes to 2nd Amendment stuff. Do I think an Obama administration, coupled with a Democratic controlled Congress, will be completely draconian in gun right restriction? Not really--the political fallout wouldn't be worth it even if they wanted to do it. Do I think more restriction could be coming down the line with such a political landscape in place? Hell yeah I do, if they think there's any call for it at all.
6/17/2008 11:16:02 PM