User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » WHY DO WE KEEP BABYING PEOPLE? Page 1 [2], Prev  
marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

it's easy as pie

1/4/2008 11:30:44 AM

Yoshiemaster
Suspended
9388 Posts
user info
edit post

^poop

2 CAREFUL

[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 11:31 AM. Reason : ]

1/4/2008 11:30:53 AM

marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

TIME FOR LUNCH

1/4/2008 11:31:55 AM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"the only way americans will appreciate freedom is under the boot of oppression"


is that a golden boot?

1/4/2008 11:33:40 AM

FykalJpn
All American
17209 Posts
user info
edit post

mmmm mutton

1/4/2008 11:33:55 AM

marko
Tom Joad
72828 Posts
user info
edit post

1/4/2008 11:34:33 AM

FykalJpn
All American
17209 Posts
user info
edit post

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanny_state

1/4/2008 11:35:53 AM

sumfoo1
soup du hier
41043 Posts
user info
edit post

anyone who agrees with this thread (as i do) i hope you realize you are probably a libertarian.
Most people don't know what one is... and if they did they would probably be one.

I just wanted to kick that out there the party isn't nearly as big as it should be because people think they're just a bunch of "dope smokin hippies" that want to legalize drugs when really they just don't believe in victimless crimes for example selling/buying drugs and the many other laws protecting people from themselves.

1/4/2008 12:28:16 PM

Snewf
All American
63368 Posts
user info
edit post

have you ever taken a class with Dr. Nick Halpern?

1/4/2008 12:34:47 PM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

while this:

Quote :
"laws should be to protect people from other people, not from themselves....imo if an action/behavior doesn't harm/ directly negatively impact someone else, there is no basis for trying to regulate it."


is great and i would love to see it, the problem with libertarianism is that there has to be a balance

sure i only use <5% of the interstate system so i should just pay for that but what about the indirect benefit that the interstate system has with its capacity for easy transportation of goods and services on my life and the stability of the country

1/4/2008 12:58:52 PM

Yoshiemaster
Suspended
9388 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"but what about the indirect benefit that the interstate system has with its capacity for easy transportation of goods and services on my life and the stability of the country"


gg, glad u pointed this out.

1/4/2008 12:59:52 PM

Vix
All American
8522 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"sure i only use <5% of the interstate system "


Under LFC the interstate system would be completely privatized. There shouldn't have to be a balance between good and evil in the government.

1/4/2008 1:00:27 PM

Metricula
Squishie Enthusiast
4040 Posts
user info
edit post

Legalize drugs? Legalize prostitution. Now that's capitalism.
(Not a hooker)

1/4/2008 1:00:55 PM

iphotou
All American
13047 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"
for example: Seat Belts.

why is it mandatory that they be used?

the way i see it, people know that if they don't buckle up and get in an accident, things could get yucky. So, if they think their life is worth living, they'll buckle up. And if they think otherwise, then no big deal if they die."


You answered your own question. Seat belts are mandatory since use of them does increase the chance for survival / less significant injury in accidents.

1/4/2008 1:01:05 PM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

^^^ god damn it...it cant be all or nothing

the interstate system isnt good or evil, it is just a service that eisenhower thought would be a good idea that fundamentally changed american culture

what about people that cant help themselves? do you just tell them too bad?



[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM. Reason : ^^^

1/4/2008 1:03:20 PM

Yoshiemaster
Suspended
9388 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"increase the chance for survival / less significant injury in accidents."


yea i know what seat belts do, i think you have missed the point.


Quote :
"the interstate system isnt good or evil, it is just a service that eisenhower thought would be a good idea that fundamentally changed american culture"


btw, he wanted them for military use as well.

/AP US history

[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 1:04 PM. Reason : ]

1/4/2008 1:03:45 PM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"btw, he wanted them for military use as well."


i know that but it doesnt make what i said wrong

1/4/2008 1:06:12 PM

Yoshiemaster
Suspended
9388 Posts
user info
edit post

yea i know, i didn't say you were wrong.


just another



thing

1/4/2008 1:07:01 PM

mantisstunna
All American
1738 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"what about people that cant help themselves? do you just tell them too bad?"



No they have friends and family that can help them. If they don't have either one of those then they should have been more sociable in life. If i got everything taken away from me right now i could easily get a decent paying job and apartment within a month. My friends/family would be willing to support me for a small amount of time as long as i tried to get back on my feet.

Yes i do feel sorry for people who truly can't get out of bad situations when they try, but to many people abuse the system so i think it needs to be cut out.

[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM. Reason : more to say]

1/4/2008 1:30:56 PM

Aficionado
Suspended
22518 Posts
user info
edit post

so you are saying that people that are so mentally or physically handicapped that they can not function in society are SOL?

1/4/2008 3:51:31 PM

Walls1441
All American
10000 Posts
user info
edit post

Dude i feel the exact same way.


I wish we could go back to living in the wild. Too many vain, idiotic, no common sense morons fucking up my air.



as for retards / physically handicapped... if we were in the wild the tigers would go for the ones with the weak legs first. So retard strength would come in handy, but knobby legs would not.

[Edited on January 4, 2008 at 4:20 PM. Reason : fjsioafjisaofj]

1/4/2008 4:19:16 PM

Yoshiemaster
Suspended
9388 Posts
user info
edit post

bttt for the friday night peoplez

1/4/2008 9:23:12 PM

 Message Boards » Chit Chat » WHY DO WE KEEP BABYING PEOPLE? Page 1 [2], Prev  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.