2 pages of retardation.
12/23/2007 2:42:57 PM
12/23/2007 10:05:37 PM
Aliens were threatening to take over the world in the late 40s. We discovered their plot and invented the neutron bomb as our only defense against them. It has the capability to destroy the entire planet which would make it worthless for them to invade us. They've since embarked on a stealth mission to take over the Earth. It involves bases in Antartica, bees, and GM viruses used against us.Not really, most of that stuff came from The X-Files movie.Personally, I think UFOs are real. I have absolutely no idea what is inside of them or who controls them, but there's too much evidence (whether you believe it or not) and the concept of UFOs has been around too long for me to not believe in them. The government is definitely involved in some way at some level and they don't want to public to know about it. They're just way too secretive about everything and every explanation they come up with to explain these things are completely bullshit.
12/24/2007 11:00:00 PM
the concept of dragons has been around for 10x as long as dragons dont exist. just saying the concept has been around so long that that something has to exist is idiotic. the government is terrible at keeping anything secretive, ESPECIALLY for decades upon decades. So im completely and 100% convinced that the government hasnt been keeping anything from the public in regards to UFOs.Does life exist somewhere else in the universe, intelligent life? Im 100% certain it does. The universe is too big not to have it. Have they been here? I wouldnt doubt it, tho I cant say for sure. Do we have ANY solid evidence? I havent seen one piece of it yet.
12/25/2007 12:01:30 AM
I'm not even convinced that half the other life out there would be noticeable as such to humans.
12/25/2007 12:49:44 AM
12/25/2007 10:31:34 AM
12/28/2007 1:56:16 PM
Holy shityou guys are still arguing something in a thread about fake video footage.
12/28/2007 2:28:20 PM
12/28/2007 2:40:28 PM
not to mention the manhattan project wasn't entirely secret either.
12/28/2007 2:55:43 PM
hahaha, the manhattan project was completely infiltrated by the soviets.
12/28/2007 3:18:33 PM
12/28/2007 6:10:20 PM
12/28/2007 6:54:34 PM
Well, it'd take infinite energy to accelerate an object to the speed of light. That's a bit of problem.
12/28/2007 6:57:20 PM
Exactly, you cannot accelerate past the speed of light, but you can travel faster than it. There is a HUGE difference between saying "You can't travel faster than light" and "You can't accelerate to ftl speeds"[Edited on December 28, 2007 at 7:02 PM. Reason : a]
12/28/2007 6:59:36 PM
Maybe, but most of the suggested ways to travel faster than light would be extremely difficult to pull off. Wormholes, for example:
12/28/2007 7:28:20 PM
its called a worm hole, they're shortcuts in space from one point to another
12/28/2007 7:28:29 PM
12/28/2007 7:58:32 PM
^ What I don't understand is why people seem to declare as either believers or skeptics. You must have experience arguing with UFO fans. I think the evidence suggests something strange is going on. I don't have an explanation. I doubt extraterrestrial visits are the answer, but I won't dismiss it all as a bunch of nonsense either.
12/28/2007 10:44:54 PM
12/29/2007 1:45:52 PM
i find it interesting that some people who try to explain the lack of evidence for ufos just attribute it to unimaginable hyper-advanced technology that we can't possibly comprehend. sounds a lot like people that argue for the existence of god.maybe god and his arch angels are piloting the ufos.
12/29/2007 5:37:20 PM
If they have such advanced technology and still managed to crash at Roswell, I don't know what to think. Something odd happened there in 1947, but I doubt aliens were involved. Seriously, how embarrassing would it be cross light-years and then eat dirt? Everyone else in the universe would make fun of you.
12/29/2007 5:49:09 PM
^hey it could be worse. aliens could show up on earth and suddenly develop severe allergies to water.
12/29/2007 10:04:05 PM
12/29/2007 11:48:08 PM
1/14/2008 10:39:59 PM
i think you would have been better off letting this thread die....
1/14/2008 11:10:26 PM
^It's not about me.It's about the Truth.The Truth Is Out There, Dammit!
1/15/2008 10:34:17 AM
I read that story earlier.....when you have so many people seeing the same thing at the same time it's got to be something out of the ordinary. Maybe not something from space, but something.
1/15/2008 2:00:51 PM
yes, out of the ordinary. And people collectively have a very hard time of coming to reasonable explanations for things that they don't see every day. If that thing in Texas or where ever was so big and was seen by so many people, fine - let's see some pictures and videos. 90% of people have a camera-phone in their pocket at all times and probably 10-20% have a decent digital still/video camera with them as well. Let's see some evidence! And there often are completely reasonable explainations for strange sightings, but "believers" will just dismiss them anyway. The "phoenix light incident" in the 90's, where thousands of people saw strange colored lights in the sky around Phoenix before they "twinkled out" has been conclusively proven and admitted to by the military, and even by the pilot who flew the plane that dropped the flares. But no, of course he's just part of the conspiracy. As with the Phoenix Lights and whatever people see in the night sky, the general line is "it was unworldly", or "there's no way something manmade could have looked like that." Oh really? WTF would you know about what is "worldly"? it's like - wow, there were some lights in the sky that formed a triangle and moved quickly. OMG HUMANS AREN'T CAPABLE OF DOING THAT!Same with crop circles. Even after countless crop circles have been created and documented exactly how they were made, people still say "humans just aren't capable of making something so perfect" give me a fucking break. 1) they really don't give determined pranksters enough credit, and 2) they are usually not in the position to be making such statements anyway.
1/15/2008 2:44:25 PM
There's probably a simple explanation for the item in the left side of this pic....http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7205004.stm
1/24/2008 1:54:29 AM
Bad Astronomy says it's a few inches tall, not far from the camera, and a rock.
1/24/2008 2:00:27 AM
great, is this going to be another "face on mars" issue where it will just take a better picture to completely debunk any wacky theories?http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm[Edited on January 24, 2008 at 7:56 AM. Reason : .]
1/24/2008 7:55:37 AM
1/24/2008 10:17:00 PM