I'm clean

I'll piss in the cup for you

11/28/2007 9:53:26 AM

How long ago did you do what? PM me if you don't want to say it here. I can say from friends experience that you usually get a second test if the first one is positive (although sometimes you have to do it at your own dr and pay for it yourself) that will void the original. By the time that would happen, you should def be able to pass and be a-ok

11/28/2007 9:53:28 AM

Quote :

"Jeepin4x4 where do you work? I work in the same building as a LabCorp on Bush St. (off Navaho from wake forest rd.)"

good ole bush st.

we use to drag race down there back in the day. like in highschool

11/28/2007 9:55:17 AM

how hard is it for you fuckers to not do drugs?

11/28/2007 9:56:09 AM

11/28/2007 9:58:01 AM

Quote :

"you are aware that some laws are unjust, right?"

do you have a grown up job yet?

11/28/2007 9:58:31 AM

Quote :

"you are aware that some laws are unjust, right?"

Life is unfair and unjust. I just don't go around and cry about it.



[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 9:59 AM. Reason : .]

11/28/2007 9:59:07 AM

Quote :

"how hard is it for you fuckers to not do drugs?"

11/28/2007 10:00:46 AM

Quote :

"Wrong. If you contract with the government then they can request any field workers to be tested (at random or en masse) but your company is not required to randomly test on their own."

Wrong.

it was $100,000 not $75,000 like I said but yes I was clearly right

http://www.trinet.com/HR_resources/HR_library/articles/drugtesting.htm

Quote :

"According to the Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, if you are an employer doing $100,000 per year or more business with the federal government for the procurement of property or services, you must have a drug-free workplace policy in place."

11/28/2007 10:05:20 AM

I don't work in Raleigh, im in charlotte and the LabCorp is off WT Harris.

11/28/2007 10:07:09 AM

Quote :

"you must have a drug-free workplace policy in place."

I guess the place I work at right now is breaking the law then. They have a sticker that says drug free workplace but I think they drug tested 2 people this year, in an effort to fire them. haha

11/28/2007 10:07:12 AM

Quote :

"it's always funny when this thread is made"

11/28/2007 10:07:31 AM

^^i dont know if it means random testing but im sure all new employees are tested

11/28/2007 10:08:09 AM

I was never tested when I was hired, nor since.

11/28/2007 10:08:56 AM

Quote :

"how hard is it for you fuckers to not do drugs?"

perhaps as hard as it would be for you to not do some unnecessary and harmless civil liberty that you enjoy

like eating meat, for instance

would it be hard to not eat meat in order to have a job?

it would

and you'd keep asking yourself "what does my meat eating have to do with anything?"

(just like people now ask themselves "what does my drug use have to do with anything?")

and then some douche comes around and says

"how hard is it for you fuckers to not eat meat?"

Quote :

"do you have a grown up job yet?"

yes

but thanks for the bigoted assumption

Quote :

"Life is unfair and unjust. I just don't go around and cry about it."

who's crying

I believe I'm bitching, bitching.

11/28/2007 10:09:01 AM

we haven't had a random test in over a year and a half.

i have a hard time thinking it was completely "random". I'm the youngest guy in the office and myself and 3 of the younger electricians from the field that i'm sure probably won't pass got called. Then they threw in a couple of the older guys to throw it off.


conspiracy!

11/28/2007 10:09:09 AM

Quote :

"perhaps as hard as it would be for you to not do some unnecessary and harmless civil liberty that you enjoy like eating meat, for instance would it be hard to not eat meat in order to have a job? "

what a dumb analogy

Yeah boss sorry I'm 3 hours late for work today and I missed that important meeting, but I was out all night eating steak

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:10 AM. Reason : .]

11/28/2007 10:10:24 AM

I think a better analogy would be having oral sex, which is illegal in many states.

11/28/2007 10:11:38 AM

how can you compare meat to drugs?

11/28/2007 10:11:46 AM

Has anyone in the company ever tasted positive for marijuana?
And if so, what have been the consequences?

11/28/2007 10:12:52 AM

coke is surprisingly rich in protein.

11/28/2007 10:13:44 AM

Quote :

"I think a better analogy would be having oral sex, which is illegal in many states."

i'd you to elaborate

b/c that seems pretty damn dumb too

11/28/2007 10:15:05 AM

Quote :

"what a dumb analogy"

Quote :

"I think a better analogy would be..."

Quote :

"how can you compare meat to drugs?"

for the millionth time

that's not how analogies work

you are fucking stupid

I'm saying that eating meat is a civil liberty

the same way that doing drugs is a civil liberty

I'm not saying that eating meat is like doing drugs

a is like b

c is like b

a is not necessarily like c

get a fucking clue!

11/28/2007 10:17:35 AM

http://www.journalism.sfsu.edu/flux/gSpot/sexLaw.html

Quote :

"Places where oral sex is illegal: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia and Washington D.C."

11/28/2007 10:17:54 AM

OH SHIT

11/28/2007 10:18:16 AM

Quote :

"Has anyone in the company ever tasted positive for marijuana? And if so, what have been the consequences?"

we have a pretty strict no tolerance, especially for guys in the field.

11/28/2007 10:19:33 AM

392 you're clearly the one who needs to get a clue

Quote :

"I'm saying that eating meat is a civil liberty the same way that doing drugs is a civil liberty"

the same way that your boss firing you from your job for failing a drug test is his civil liberty

11/28/2007 10:19:35 AM

Most companies make you get clean within X weeks and retest. I've never had to deal with this though so I can only speak to what I've heard about various companies.

11/28/2007 10:20:57 AM

but meat isnt a drug.

help

11/28/2007 10:22:53 AM

My company doesn't drug test - but we don't have problems with drug addicts coming to work high... so drug testing would be a big waste of money.

11/28/2007 10:23:00 AM

haha i never ever come to work on any sort of substance. hell i dont ever do any substance from sunday-friday. strictly on the weekends.

11/28/2007 10:24:05 AM

Quote :

"how hard is it for you fuckers to not do drugs?"

11/28/2007 10:24:43 AM

don't waste your time drinking a bunch of water right now..that has no effect

just drink like a gallon a couple hours before you piss

also, take some Vitamin B (I think) so that your piss will be yellow

this is supposed to be a guaranteed pass

11/28/2007 10:26:45 AM

Quote :

"haha i never ever come to work on any sort of substance. hell i dont ever do any substance from sunday-friday. strictly on the weekends saturdays."

11/28/2007 10:29:15 AM

Quote :

"...your boss firing you from your job for failing a drug test is his civil liberty"

I never said that wasn't a liberty

seriously though

the reason analogies were removed from the SATs

is because an embarrassing number of you idiots can't comprehend what is being compared

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=503416&page=1#10957787

Quote :

"My company doesn't drug test - but we don't have problems with drug addicts coming to work high... so drug testing would be a big waste of money."

exactly
exactly
exactly

unless the g0vt forces the company to test, which is just war on drugs bullshit

they know they're gonna lose the war on drugs, so they are trying every damn thing they can

fair or not


^^^
good job missing the point. again. idiot. (I am smarter stoned than you are sober)

11/28/2007 10:30:39 AM

if they drug tested where I work, nobody would have a job

11/28/2007 10:31:11 AM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,308258,00.html


and companies should start installing speed detectors in employee cars. speeding is illegal, after all. don't wawnt nun o dem law breakurs

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:32 AM. Reason : fhds]

11/28/2007 10:31:51 AM

^^^^friday nights and saturdays

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:32 AM. Reason : ^^]

11/28/2007 10:31:55 AM

that's not what you said. Are you lying because of the drugs?

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM. Reason : .]

11/28/2007 10:33:29 AM

Quote :

"uote : "Places where oral sex is illegal: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Georgia, North and South Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia and Washington D.C.""

Except sodomy laws are rarely enforced. In fact, since Lawrence v. Texas prosecutors have not really bothered to pursue them at all. Some exceptions are in the cases of child-sex laws- but even these statutes are being rewritten (georgia case comes to mind) so that the laws are not act-specific.

I'd be surprised if you could find a case of someone being convicted under one of those laws since that court decision. I'd look myself, but I have to run to campus.

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:34 AM. Reason : ]

11/28/2007 10:33:55 AM

.

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:36 AM. Reason : i was wrong oops!]

11/28/2007 10:34:40 AM

Quote :

"also, take some Vitamin B (I think) so that your piss will be yellow"

B turns your color a noticeably different hue of yellow.

and drug testers are told that so they look out for it.

11/28/2007 10:35:11 AM

Quote :

"good job missing the point. again. idiot. (I am smarter stoned than you are sober)"

WRONG. you are WEAKER because you rely on drugs for the wrong reasons. unless you have a medical condition that warrants it, taking drugs is simply an escape from reality for you weak minded fools.

11/28/2007 10:35:56 AM

^^^ the term "sodomy law" covers laws that prohibit sex acts between consenting adults, not just "sodomy" as in anal sex.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_law


Sexual-deviance laws fall into this umbrella category and are all potentially covered under Lawrence v. Texas (2003). Hell, some sodomy statutes make it illegal to masturbate.

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:38 AM. Reason : ]

11/28/2007 10:35:59 AM

My personal belief is that ultimately, it all boils down to your personal responsibility. If you knew that you might possibly (even if it's a remote possibility) be subjected to drug tests, and that the results of such tests could directly impact your employment status, yet you still decided to partake of substances which would produce unfavorable results in such tests...then you should be prepared to deal with the consequences of your actions.

Regardless of what should or should not be fair, in your opinion, even if it involves eating meat, you agreed to abide by explicitly stated policies as a term of employment. It's not your right to be employed by any company; it is your privilege. Is it really that hard to just not do it? Are you really using your substance habits to determine the path that your life career makes? That goes for all habits: internet, alcohol, pot, coke, little boys, etc.

This is a joke.

11/28/2007 10:36:25 AM

^^^^^
I think the point was that they're both unjust laws

that don't reveal any actual malice, dishonesty, or irresponsibility on the part of the "perp"

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:39 AM. Reason : ^^^^^]

11/28/2007 10:38:28 AM

you're gonna strap a condom of clean piss to your leg, arent you?

11/28/2007 10:39:33 AM

if i failed and didn't get a second chance i guess this would be my sign to move west.




So everyone knows, I've already pissed. didn't get a chance to come up with an elaborate scheme.

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:40 AM. Reason : edit]

11/28/2007 10:39:50 AM

^^^ Oh I know what the point was, but a lot of people don't realize that those laws were probably ruled as unconstitutional (I say probably because the court left things somewhat open in the sense of what was actually protected.)

[Edited on November 28, 2007 at 10:40 AM. Reason : ]

11/28/2007 10:40:14 AM

yeaaaah Alexander supertramp style

11/28/2007 10:40:22 AM