nvm[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:27 PM. Reason : fuck it]
9/24/2007 12:23:42 PM
stupid people shouldn't breed drive post
9/24/2007 12:25:53 PM
9/24/2007 12:25:59 PM
...You're still missing the point he's trying to makeyou can't know for sure]
9/24/2007 12:27:39 PM
because the first act as father to your near birth child should be to drive 120mph down the highway[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:29 PM. Reason : give me the ambulance, i'll drive]
9/24/2007 12:28:49 PM
^ lol...and as far as I'm concerned, people used to have babies without hospitals and they were fine.
9/24/2007 12:29:20 PM
9/24/2007 12:31:16 PM
9/24/2007 12:31:53 PM
again
9/24/2007 12:32:44 PM
^ nah, fuck everyone else because my personal issues take precedence over your safety and mine and I'm a pro nascar driver
9/24/2007 12:33:12 PM
9/24/2007 12:33:24 PM
people used to have babies go to work/shopping without hospitals cars and they were fine
9/24/2007 12:34:30 PM
^^ I've already said I'm not talking about simple speeding. Read before respondingI don't care to count the number of times I've specifically mentioned dangerous agressive drivers. This is what I'm talking about. People attempt to defend their driving like this by saying it's arrogant for people to think they can just slow them down. If even a slim majority of the people bitching in this thread limited their tactics to staying the legal distance back and flashing their lights, then I wouldn't even be talking. [Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:37 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 12:34:50 PM
9/24/2007 12:36:11 PM
9/24/2007 12:37:00 PM
9/24/2007 12:37:46 PM
Well, apparently, his one post about talking about 'tailgating and rapid lane-changing' [the latter, of which, btw, isn't inherently dangerous either] is to apply to every other post in here. Never mind that there really are people who take the 'speeding = dangerous' stance.^I wasn't the one talking about tailgating. Honking and flashing are not reckless. Knowing that in NC, you're at fault for rear-end collisions means I don't fucking tailgate. I'll probably keep that up once I move out of here, jsut because the hassle involved if something goes wrong just isn't worth it.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:39 PM. Reason : lkjd]
9/24/2007 12:38:37 PM
9/24/2007 12:38:57 PM
^^ Nah it's not dangerous, just criminal. Of course, deciding you can break the law is a kind of arrogance- but to some extent so is having a spine. But yeah that's not what I'm getting on about. I've had people ride up on my ass while I'm in the left lane passing people and going 15 over plenty of times. They'll flash their lights and flick me off as though they're entitled to not have me in their way. I've even had one guy do this to me while in very heavy traffic while the passenger held up a handwritten sign saying "slower traffic keep right." The cry for yielding to faster traffic has to be tempered with a realization that you are not entitled to go as fast as you want.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:42 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 12:40:11 PM
consider road?
9/24/2007 12:40:50 PM
best parody thread ever.
9/24/2007 12:41:06 PM
9/24/2007 12:42:17 PM
^not his point dipshit.You're saying it's ok for you to break the law in cases that you deem necessary.
9/24/2007 12:42:44 PM
^^ You really missed the whole point of that sentence. Way to quote out of context.
9/24/2007 12:43:32 PM
It's okay to break a lot of fucking laws, if you're willing to overlook legality. Necessity be damned.^well, when I reply to a 2line post, and address that, of course it's going to look out of context once you've added some context.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:44 PM. Reason : lkj]
9/24/2007 12:43:46 PM
Please note that in that same sentence I equated obeying all laws with spinelessness.^The hypenation was added well before you responded.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:45 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 12:44:30 PM
it's ok guys, one of those little teeth from the plastic applicator lacerated her vajayjay. So she's a little bitchy this morning.
9/24/2007 12:45:03 PM
I don't have a cycle, thanks ^^so it was, but when I had the reply window open, the original post was what I had up. [Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:46 PM. Reason : alk]
9/24/2007 12:45:26 PM
Nobody make a tranny joke.^ Well then... [Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:46 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 12:46:27 PM
I don't give a shit if you've gone 15+ and had someone behind you being aggressive. everyone has. Once I was done passing whatever it was I was passing, I got over and let them pass. I don't give a shit why they're doing what they're doing. I just want them away from me, and will facilitate that.So you think they're reckless and dangerous. GG. They're not the only people in life who endanger others.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:49 PM. Reason : I've replied to your edit. Are you happy now]
9/24/2007 12:49:26 PM
9/24/2007 12:49:56 PM
9/24/2007 12:52:51 PM
Truthfully the asshole driving slow is the one driving recklessly. Making someone pass you on the right is very dangerous and the cause of a lot of accidents. In Germany it is actually illegal to pass on the right. People though are better drivers and also respect other motorists by getting right if someone is trying to pass. You do not have as many morons that do not know any better or the "self rightout" (probably former hallway monitors) who drive in the left lane to slow down those "crazy speeders"
9/24/2007 12:54:32 PM
^^^ READ THE LAST PART OF THAT SENTENCE PLEASE. Jesus, I made the point that obeying all laws is spinelessness. There's a balance where you're not selfishly risking other people's lives.If you quote me and say "but not all laws should necessarily be obeyed" then you are AGREEING with the sentence you are misquoting. Please read entire sentences as their meaning may actually depend on all the words in them.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 12:56 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 12:54:36 PM
9/24/2007 12:56:05 PM
Of course the issue of legality and obedience to laws can be interesting to discuss in regards to states with "keep right" laws. People pointing out those laws while at the same time speeding themselves could be accused of being hypocritical.
9/24/2007 12:59:06 PM
RE READ FIRST POST AS:BECAUSE SOMEONE WANTED ME TO GET OUT OF THE WAY, THEY HURT MY PRIDE, AND NOW I HAVE TO SHOW OFF AND BE AN ASSHOLE SO THAT RECOGNIZE THAT I'M NOT REALLY THE LOSER THAT ALL SIGNS POINT TO.GET YOUR CORSSICA OUT OF THE WAY, ASSHAT. YOU NEED TO BE IN THE RIGHT LANE, IF FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN IT WILL BE EASIER TO PULL OVER WHEN THAT PIECE OF SHIT BREAKS DOWN.
9/24/2007 1:00:35 PM
With the exception of local municipalities changing speed limits due to accident prone stretches or speed traps, speed limits are set by engineers who helped design the road. The actual speed limit is set to a the theorized percentile of how fast different drivers will drive and is actually a fraction of the absolute maximum speed that can be driven safely. The set speed is created knowingly that some drivers will drive "faster" then the speed limit.The speed limit is thus created to help ensure driver safety b.c if they posted a speed closer to the maximum speed the road could handle you would still have morons trying to go faster and a lot more accidents. The "Slower Traffic Keep Right" is just another tactic used by traffic engineers to help increase safety with the knowledge that some drivers will be going faster then the mean traffic speed. Even though the driver going 10 over is technically "breaking the law" the bitch in the passing lane going the speed limit is creating the actual traffic hazard.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 1:07 PM. Reason : l]
9/24/2007 1:06:05 PM
Again, the argument that "Speeding=dangerous" has not been made.
9/24/2007 1:07:26 PM
well you tried to call me hypocritical. Truth being you actually presented a false argument.
9/24/2007 1:09:49 PM
I didn't call you a hypocrite since you haven't cited keep right laws. I wasn't referring to you.Also, as far as keep-right laws go:http://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.htmlMany states do have laws that slower traffic must keep right and some even allow only passing in the left lane. From what I can tell, indiana is NOT one of them though. False argument eh?[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 1:14 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 1:10:43 PM
if you'd just get the fuck out of the way and drive/cruise in the RIGHT lane like you're supposed to, this never would have been an issue.
9/24/2007 1:12:45 PM
9/24/2007 1:16:03 PM
9/24/2007 1:18:10 PM
Charybdisjim are you fucking blindhttp://www.ai.org/legislative/ic/code/title9/ar21/ch8.html#IC9-21-8-2
9/24/2007 1:18:52 PM
Right half of highway /= right lane you fucking retard. This language deals with (and is identical to) the NC law code that forbids driving ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE road.
9/24/2007 1:21:00 PM
9/24/2007 1:21:23 PM
9/24/2007 1:33:05 PM
9/24/2007 1:36:13 PM
^^^ No, it's not an oversimplification. Driving too fast for conditions is in the leading factor in traffic accidents.I have no problem with speed limits as they are now.I would have no problem with raising interstate speed limits.I do have a problem with people who think they can barrel down the highway, in traffic, at 15-20+ mph above the speed limit.I do have a problem with people who think that it's safe to drive 3 feet off my rear bumper.My 'you' was directed at people in general, not you in particular. But thank you anyway for pointing out that drivers and cars are all different. I never considered that...[/sarcasm]. Other than your bragging, I know nothing about your driving skills. Your car, however, is not the average vehicle on the highway.^ I would agree with that. But the average car on the road is not an autobahn tested modern marvel.[Edited on September 24, 2007 at 1:38 PM. Reason : ]
9/24/2007 1:36:16 PM