page 2
9/19/2007 8:32:32 PM
blatantly unconstitutionalbut they tell you you're giving up that right...thats just the way it is right now
9/19/2007 8:43:49 PM
i don't care if they pay you money and give you a blowjob while they are at it, it's still unConstitutional, since the gubment is forcing you to give up one Constitutionally protected right in order to utilize another Constitutionally protected right.
9/19/2007 8:45:41 PM
should you be able to have a cruise missile? is that protected by the 2nd amendment? not saying i disagree with you, but where do you draw the line? if class 3 weapons were really easy to get they'd get stolen and it'd be a scary country
9/19/2007 9:03:40 PM
They do, and it is.
9/19/2007 9:25:25 PM
^^ where do I draw the line? With the Constitution. Should I be able to get a cruise missile? I'm leaning towards [yes]
9/19/2007 11:04:18 PM
would you feel comfortable if John Q. Mailman and Tyrone G. Thuggins had cruise missiles?That would also mean cruise missiles for Ahkmed M. Sleepercell[Edited on September 19, 2007 at 11:22 PM. Reason : .]
9/19/2007 11:21:20 PM
so, then we should ban all firearms as well, because that means John Q. Mailman, Tyrone G. Thuggins, and Ahkmed M. Sleepercell also wouldn't have them, right? oh, and btw, those were the worst fake names ever
9/19/2007 11:26:13 PM
nope. no middleground. impossible. black or white. those are the only choices.
9/19/2007 11:29:56 PM
in this case there need be no middle ground, because any "middle ground" blatantly infringes upon the Constitutionally protected right of citizens to bear arms. The purpose of the 2nd amendment was to ensure that the citizenry could throw off the yoke of an oppressive government if the need arose. Moreover, an armed citizenry would also help keep the government in check. If we interpret the 2nd Amendment to only protect "guns," then its purpose is defeated, as mere guns would be insufficient to fight against the US gov't now, should the citizenry ever deem it too oppressive to bear.
9/19/2007 11:36:15 PM
I'm content bearing arms without owning any cruise missiles
9/19/2007 11:38:26 PM
that's fine. just don't go around infringing on any one else's right to bear cruise missiles and we are good.I'm fine not being a Muslim, but I'm not going to make it illegal for anyone else to be a Muslim...]
9/19/2007 11:47:30 PM
How did this degenerate into a discussion about cruise missiles?I don't miss State.[Edited on September 21, 2007 at 2:28 AM. Reason : ]
9/21/2007 2:26:45 AM
9/21/2007 3:08:12 AM
they're not supposed to be clever, they're supposed to get the point across without offending pussy faggots like you
9/21/2007 9:10:41 AM
psych!http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/09/21/blackwater/index.html
9/21/2007 12:52:22 PM
Sweet! The Iraqi government has no power within their borders, and we're keeping it that way.
9/21/2007 12:55:39 PM
apparently (and unrelated to the shooting incidents), Blackwater is currently being investigated by the Feds for illegally smuggling weapons into Iraq... weapons that have found their way to various insurgent groups.the Raleigh office of the FBI is investigating and has at least two Blackwater employees who are "cooperating" in exchange for sentence reduction.
9/22/2007 2:15:53 AM
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/18/iraq/main3271151.shtmlClick the "Videos" tab--and watch.
9/22/2007 3:25:43 AM
i like how the US/Blackwater version of the incident, that they were ambushed in a firefight -- heavily disputed by numerous witnesses -- is "supported" by a cartoonish CGI animation as an illustration.kind of reminded me of the WMD "evidence"
9/22/2007 4:05:15 AM
^ CBS created the animation. If it's phony, it kind of reminds me of those phony documents that Dan Rather cooked up about Bush. STFU, you fucking troll.
9/22/2007 4:09:18 AM
who loves you, baby?
9/22/2007 4:35:50 AM
^ Yeah, I know--you kiss it out when you've got nothing.
9/22/2007 4:38:43 AM
9/22/2007 3:29:47 PM
9/23/2007 10:19:29 PM
^message_topic.aspx?topic=495278no one wanted to post in my thread though
9/23/2007 11:33:19 PM
i kind of wanted to.... i just dont have anything to add on this topic yet. you should know better than to try and fork an already-successful thread, anyhow. (especially since i had already referenced the incident before you even tried to fork it)
9/24/2007 12:49:45 AM
9/24/2007 11:48:44 AM