there is no reason why this thread should have made it to page 2
7/18/2007 8:31:29 AM
Charlotte has no artistic soul. Name a nationally known band to come out of Charlotte in the last 10 years. I can name 5 from the Raleigh area without trying. They have a shitty visual arts scene, too. NoDa is Charlotte's attempt at an artistic pulse, but it's still not good enough.
7/18/2007 8:49:22 AM
oh god, no artistic soul. what is a city to do.
7/18/2007 9:18:10 AM
7/18/2007 10:15:48 AM
7/18/2007 11:45:13 AM
^petey motherfuckin pablogood charlotte for charlotte lol
7/18/2007 11:48:19 AM
^^ yeah i've heard of some of those bands. I find it funny people think downtown Raleigh has anything on downtown Charlotte. Not to say downtown Raleigh doesn't have great places, but there's just so many more people/places in downtown Charlotte. So in turn there's a lot more places to see and things to do. ^Yeah please, everyone knows what "big cities" are. Cities arn't black and white. Big or small. Ashevilles a great place, and it's fairly small. You can't really catagorize cities by calling them "a big city" or not. Charlote is ranked 20th in the US for population and the US has a lot of cities. So if you defined "big city" i'm sure Charlotte would fall under that catagory. Whereas Raleigh is all the way down in spot 51 after Wichita, Kansas. Whereas Charlotte is up with the big leagues like Baltimore, Boston, Seattle, Milwaukee, Denver, etc. Hell Charlotte is even bigger than Boston, Seattle, Milwaukee, Denver, Las Vegas, Nashville, and plenty others. Even Atlanta. Of course that's based upon population within city limits of course. I had no idea Charlotte beat out those cities in population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_by_populationCheck it out...[Edited on July 18, 2007 at 12:01 PM. Reason : .]
7/18/2007 12:00:32 PM
7/18/2007 12:18:29 PM
^exactly^^you missed the boat. boston is really a huge city but the city limits only include downtown. Hell, Boston College itself isn't even "in boston". charlottes city limits include every fucking thing. raleigh is really about the same pop as charlotte. Probably a little small. it has more density it just doesn't have its borders expanded as wide. the population numbers are distorted. Theres probably 100k people that consider themselves living in raleigh but aren't counted because raleigh is a bit picky on its city limits. Drive around raleigh and you will see city limit signs all over the place even when you're nowhere near the outskirts of raleigh.[Edited on July 18, 2007 at 12:23 PM. Reason : oops][Edited on July 18, 2007 at 12:24 PM. Reason : oops size=pop or size=size]
7/18/2007 12:23:15 PM
you really need to compare the metro areas of cities to get a feel for how well they relate to one another.this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_metropolitan_areasis a little more accurate as far as how different cities compare to one another as far as size and feel.anyone thats been to Charlotte and cities like Baltimore, Boston, or Denver knows that they arent really the same as it may seem when comparing city line populations.[Edited on July 18, 2007 at 12:28 PM. Reason : g]
7/18/2007 12:24:47 PM
Thats alot better but its pretty inaccurate how Raleigh is just Cary while cities like virginia beach include norfolk, newport news and chesapeke.
7/18/2007 12:29:42 PM
yeah, i guess you have to draw the line somewhere.
7/18/2007 12:32:08 PM
^^^^, ^^^ No i completely agree. City limits really don't determine what a city is. Boston is obviously a much larger "city" than Charlotte even though it has a smaller city populartion (within limits). I love Boston, try to get up there every chance i get. Still if you compared metro areas Charlotte would still be up at 36, and Raleigh is still down at 51. So on any statistical list or anything I couldn't see how anyone would put Raleigh anywhere near Charlotte on any list. ^exactly[Edited on July 18, 2007 at 12:34 PM. Reason : .]
7/18/2007 12:33:39 PM
I have yet to meet a banker at a bar and I've been here for over a month
7/18/2007 6:10:10 PM
7/18/2007 7:50:13 PM
I am from Charlotte and am back here now again. And based on absolutely no scientific or statistical basis, I'd say Charlotte is "bigger." In Raleigh, the different areas seemed more defined from one another. Like Cary was somewhat separate from Raleigh, and Durham was definitely a separate city as well as Chapel Hill. Here in Charlotte, everything just kind of merges together and forms one big metro area.
7/18/2007 8:04:28 PM
i'm not going to get into which city is better to live in/which downtown is better (i've never lived in charlotte) BUT i can think of maybe two or three shows i've ever been to in charlotte (or even wanted to go to) and i've been to countless shows in the triangle. i think the music (at least for stuff i like) is far better here than charlotte.
7/18/2007 9:23:53 PM
Charlotte fucking sucks. Everybody knows it. I'm tired of people from Charlotte talking about how much bigger than Raleigh it is...they want me to question it so they can bust out some numbers. Nobody cares how big Charlotte is.The fact is that the Triangle is a much more desirable place to live. It's pretty fucking vanilla, but that's why we have Durham, Chapel Hill, and Carrboro, and the state's best universities, etc, etc, etc...
7/18/2007 9:43:22 PM
I worked near Charlotte once summer in college and spent a lot of time there on weekends and stuff. IMO it sucks. Raleigh might not be as "big", but Charlotte is just a sprawling, hot shithole. Sure the "uptown" is nice, but that hardly defines what makes living somewhere great (unless you just spend all of your time in bars). As has been said Raleigh's art and music scenes far surpass Charlotte's. I guess what's the point in arguing over this though, some people like Raleigh, some Charlotte. But we all know that Raleigh is better...
7/19/2007 10:09:52 AM
It seems the majority of people in this thread thought Charlotte was better. Although i'm glad we finally got some people on the Raleigh side. Don't get me wrong, i hate Charlotte sprawl, but that's why i live in Plaza Midwood. I don't have to deal with rush hour, 485, 85, or 77. I can get almost anywhere in town from a central location in a fair amount of time. My commute to work is 2 minutes. It seems to me the biggest reason people complain about Charlotte is because they live in the suburbs or have a long commute. I agree that sucks, but what happened to the age old idea of working/living/partying close to home? I live close to everything i do. Takes me just as long to get to UNCC (10 minutes) as it does to get to south park (10 minutes). You'd be hard pressed to find someone who lives in Plaza Midwood, Myers Park, Elizabeth, Dilworth, etc etc who complains about sprawl. (Unless they commute to the suburbs to work? Maybe?)
7/19/2007 10:33:11 AM
the only things the triangle has on charlotte IMO are:- NC State- The Cats Cradlethats about it...raleigh is a kind of a POS town...if it didnt have State it would REALLY suckand i'm sorry for the people who dislike charlotte...its not my fault you suck at finding something interesting to doalso, contrary to some people's beliefs, New York and Chicago are not the only two cities in the US that are technically "cities"...yes everybody fucking knows they are bigger cities than Charlotte and Raleigh]
7/19/2007 10:51:33 AM
^Thank you. Yeah if Raleigh wasn't the capital, didn't have state, then it wouldn't have terribly much compared to Charlotte.
7/19/2007 11:00:55 AM
if charlotte didnt have the panthers, buildings, or people then it wouldnt have terribly much compared to raleigh
7/19/2007 11:16:11 AM
charlotte would suck a huge black dick if i didn't live in the uptown area - i would rather live in johnston county than live in fucking ballantyne or some other fucked up suburb where i had to drive 45 min each way to work. but if you live in the uptown area, things are more accessible than in downtown raleigh, particularly with 277 and I77 going right through the city. Downtown Raleigh doesn't have anything like that to move people in and out of center city quickly. The light rail project has been and currently is a disaster but at least it demonstrates a desire for progression, albiet a fucked up one
7/19/2007 11:21:08 AM
For real, if Charlotte didn't have it's downtown it would suck!!! If you didn't have your arms you would suck at basketball. Come on people, that's a horrible argument. Raleigh is what it is in part because of NCSU. Charlotte is what it is in part because of whatever the hell Charlotte claims.
7/19/2007 11:21:55 AM
you know there are more places in charlotte besides downtown and ballantynei dont even consider ballantyne charlotte (even though it is in charlotte)
7/19/2007 11:22:26 AM
7/19/2007 11:25:09 AM
7/19/2007 11:28:24 AM
i've lived in both cities. grew up in charlotte. been in raleigh for the past 6 years almost. raleigh still blows
7/19/2007 11:42:21 AM
yeah i lived in raleigh for about 5 years and have lived in charlotte longer than that... i would hope the people saying one city or another city sucks have at least lived there for a couple months
7/19/2007 11:57:41 AM
7/19/2007 12:11:23 PM
i live off selwyn (not downtown) and charlotte does not suck a huge black dick]
7/19/2007 12:25:03 PM
too much angst
7/19/2007 12:32:48 PM
^^Sorry i meant in the Charlotte area, not specifically downtown. Selwyn would be considered not far from downtown. Just take providence in. I was agreeing Charlotte would suck if you lived in like Matthews, Minthill, Gastonia, Ballantyne, Huntersville, etc because of the commute, and travel time to get places within the city.
7/19/2007 12:35:55 PM
no doubt and i agree...my commute is about 15 minutes but i'm goodand i'll probably always like charlotte more than raleigh just cause i'm from charlotte and grew up in charlotte, even though i do like raleigh
7/19/2007 2:28:56 PM
But Raleigh still has the population of NYC circa 1845.
7/19/2007 3:05:59 PM
raleigh needs to get some skyscrapers if it wants to LOOK as big as charlotte(pauses a moment for the NYC/LA/Chicago/etc people to tell me how Charlotte has no skyline)there are a bunch of skyscrapers (40 plus stories) going up in Charlotte in the next 5-10 years...skyline is gonna be fairly impressive around 2015
7/19/2007 3:08:46 PM
^yeah no kidding. They just keep building shit uptown. Skyline is going to look great in 10-15 years. Raleigh's skyline is a joke compared to Charlottes. Buildings are so short in Raleigh you get behind a 2 story building and you can't see the skyline. In Charlotte you can't really avoid them. Not to mention all the buildings in Raleigh look old and outdated. Don't get me wrong, SOME old buildings are nice, but only when they have architectural significance or a long history. [Edited on July 19, 2007 at 3:13 PM. Reason : .]
7/19/2007 3:10:36 PM
Does raleigh even have the necessary infrastructure downtown for that kind of density?With the exception of Dawson, McDowell, and a few others, it seems like all of the downtown roads are 2 lane.
7/19/2007 3:12:11 PM
^doubt it. They'd have to do some massive rethinking of their transportation infrastructure. Charlotte is, and has been able to deal with it's massive downtown. Simply walk around downtown Charlotte and there's crazy amounts of people compared to downtown Raleigh. Mostly to do with accesssibility and parking options, and the fact there's much much more people in downtown Charlotte. It'll be nice once they get all those skybridges back up around College St in Charlotte, once those new buildings get built.
7/19/2007 3:17:38 PM
I live off on Boylan downtown and I give it 5 years max before traffic is a nightmare.It already is on any night during the weekend.
7/19/2007 3:23:17 PM
^Yup. That's why i love Charlotte's one-way, no turn streets. Makes traffic so much smoother at rushhour. Plus it's more like a big city.
7/19/2007 3:30:01 PM
Whatever, dude. Raleigh was smart enough to turn their wide one way streets into narrow two way streets.
7/19/2007 3:45:21 PM
You're right. It's a weird argument. If you study road development they argue it all the time. http://ti.org/vaupdate30.htmlOne-way grids and one-way couplets are more traditional and allow cars to travel faster. They pollute less (cars move faster, and don't stop/start as much), and cause less crahses, not to mention idiots who drive drunk have less to think about. The only reason cities convert streets to 2-way is to "slow down" traffic and allow for better pedestrian friendly access. As that article said in the 70's air pollution was an issue so many 2-way streets were converted to 1-way. It's a little harder if you're new to the city, but once figured out, it's quicker, safer, and more efficient.
7/19/2007 4:06:43 PM
Wiki says Stockholm has a pop density ~10,000
7/19/2007 4:55:33 PM
I think charlotte is better because it has taller buildings, more people, and I can always get the crack i need from the drug dealers around eastway. Raleigh>>>Charlotte ; except for seeing family or a panthers game i hate going back to charlotte.the only thing charlotte has going for it is 1.) the panthers 2.) a downtown bar scene.Raleigh is better then charlotte in everything else imho, and their is an increase diversity of activities if you include durham and chapel hill all less then an hour away. Not to mention i can hop on 40 and be at the beach in <2 hours. even the malls are better. If you are going to count concord mills then Southpoint is included too which is far more upscale and a lot nicer.i guess if you want to be a douchebag banker charlotte is better.[Edited on July 19, 2007 at 6:21 PM. Reason : l]
7/19/2007 6:19:03 PM
7/19/2007 6:26:38 PM
^^^^ yeah, that was complete sarcasmyay one way streets
7/19/2007 6:34:33 PM
^^Exactly Are you actually from Matthews? This would explain the Charlotte hate. I'm assuming you live/lived closer to town in Raleigh? It's hard to compare Charlotte/Raleigh if you lived in Matthews. But then again i have no idea because i've lived in Plaza Midwood my whole life. Going to college in a town really changes someones opinion of thier hometown. I like both, and now that i think about it, it's really hard to say which one i like better. I think it disgraces each city by trying to compare them. It just brings out the sucky parts of each city. They both have thier own good qualities, and you could argue either way.[Edited on July 19, 2007 at 6:35 PM. Reason : .]
7/19/2007 6:35:02 PM
7/19/2007 6:41:16 PM