^ BUT THE EARTH TILTS, TOOHOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT?See, I can be Treetwista, too.
7/11/2007 12:46:52 PM
^^please continue explaining the other bodies that experience climate change...i really am interested^^^
7/11/2007 12:48:14 PM
I'm not going to hold your hand, just pick one of these and read it: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&q=climate+change+other+planets&btnG=Search
7/11/2007 12:49:56 PM
^oh you just made it sound like it was so easy i figured you knew all about it and understood the interworkings of all celestial bodies and could easily explain it
7/11/2007 12:50:38 PM
I could, but anyone who really cares about the issue should seek out the information on their own. You'd be far more convinced if you read the information for yourself.
7/11/2007 12:51:51 PM
7/11/2007 12:52:35 PM
^^hey, you're the one who made the bold claim of "they are obviously not related to the Earth's warming"I figured you should back up such a bold claim^(carl face)...i feel sorry for your students]
7/11/2007 12:53:21 PM
the thermostat controls the temperature in my apartment.therefore,if the temperature rises in my apartment, someone raised the thermostat. Perfectly sound, according to tree.
7/11/2007 12:55:04 PM
that might literally be the worst attempt at an analogy that i've ever seen in my 27 year old lifei just hope you teach history at your high school and not anything science related]
7/11/2007 12:55:52 PM
How is it a bad analogy? Explain how it doesn't represent your argument:The sun effects climateTherefore, if climate change is occurring, the sun is responsible. I mean, you learned it in kindergarten, after all. Did you take a logic class somewhere between kindergarten and graduating from college?Shit. I'm not doing this again. Study after study comes out. Tree tries to poke holes in them, and fails on the first page. Then the next 10 to 27 pages are spent trying to get him to understand why he failed on the first page.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 1:06 PM. Reason : .]
7/11/2007 12:58:34 PM
^^^^ The "obvious" part for me comes in with the fact that other planets have drastically different atmospheres and orbits than us, so it would be impossible for them to warm the same way, even if the sun's output was the only thing that affected their temperatures.Especially to claim a body like Titan or Enceladus which is so far out, has practically no atmosphere, and is in the shadow of their planets for significant amounts of time, to claim that the change in global temperature for them is the same as Earth, when their temperatures are swinging at rates and percentages not even close to Earth's, is ridiculous. And then to use what you admit is not well studied as the sole data point in a rejection of anthropogenic climate change, which is EXTREMELY well studied by comparison is absurd, and borderline delusional.It's good to see though that the doubters are causing the scientists to look deeper in to the issues, but I doubt the reason for a lot of the global warming doubters are scientific, so it won't change anything really.
7/11/2007 1:04:20 PM
^well thats fine, but one thing that affects (thats spelled with an 'e' Boone) ALL planets and moons is the sun...every planet/body has localized impacts...but the Sun affects all of them...to say any temp changes on other planets are "obviously not related to the Earth's warming" is making some big assumptions^^logical fallacy]
7/11/2007 1:10:23 PM
He majored in Global Warming, after all.http://www.thewolfweb.com/user_info.aspx?user=32786 ^Yes, it is. And it's what you're arguing, genius.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 1:13 PM. Reason : ]
7/11/2007 1:13:03 PM
7/11/2007 1:15:34 PM
^nobody is saying the earth is causing other planets to get warmer...but it seems pretty logical that one of the things affecting the earth's climate (the sun) is also affecting the climate of any other planetary bodies in the solar system...so one of the things affecting the earth's climate is affecting other planets...so its not related to the Earth, but its related to one of the inputs that affects the warming of the earth
7/11/2007 1:25:22 PM
There really needs to be a new "Treetwista's Quotes of Brilliance" thread
7/11/2007 1:27:58 PM
i wish I had a 2 month summer vacation but im not a high school teacher]
7/11/2007 1:28:28 PM
Apparently every day is vacation at your job. How do you manage to have such an important career in between your 100+ posts per day?
7/11/2007 1:31:00 PM
when all my equipment is working properly, it is a pretty relaxing day...if we have big problems i'll be working on those, not posting on here...btw its ~23 posts/day..not ~100/day...but you love completely butchering statistics dont youso apparently i'm good at my job since i'm able to dick around on hereyou on the other hand, are a high school history teacher...in some countries thats the penalty for shoplifting]
7/11/2007 1:32:46 PM
You're talking crap, which should never occur ifA) You're an IT guyB) You just said this:
7/11/2007 1:35:19 PM
^whats wrong with that quote? and i want you to try and answer me...dont just wait for moron or somebody else reply so you can base what you say off thatalso you might want to try and get back on topic since you havent been on topic the entire thread...sure i've made fun of you for being a pathetic high school teacher, but i've also made plenty of comments relevant to the topic...too bad you havent
7/11/2007 1:38:10 PM
^^i already explained that when things are working at my job i have free time...not everyone has a "conventional" job like working at mcdonalds, collecting garbage or teaching high school history (i doubt its even an IB/AP class)but thanks for proving how good you are at copying and pasting]
7/11/2007 1:45:17 PM
Starting with this:
7/11/2007 1:48:22 PM
talk to any teacher. they'll tell you that teaching ap/ib is the best gig in school
7/11/2007 1:48:34 PM
7/11/2007 1:50:10 PM
^^For real. You don't have to do anything. I bet I could rival Tree's posting habits if I taught AP.^Most of the time it's half experience, half being put out to pasture. 100% seniority.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 1:52 PM. Reason : .]
7/11/2007 1:50:16 PM
i'll bet i could rival your posting habits if my other accounts like boonedocks were locked and suspended for trolling
7/11/2007 1:51:16 PM
^^^that's why i said teacher. sure, a professor is also a "teacher" but i was clearly talking about hs teachers.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 1:52 PM. Reason : ^^^]
7/11/2007 1:51:49 PM
So please, Twista, explain how this study did not disprove the link between solar activity and climate change.And don't so into semantics over the meaning of the word "prove."
7/11/2007 1:53:39 PM
7/11/2007 1:56:47 PM
^^i already did that on the first page but here i'll do it again- the study studied only one thing: the relationship between solar radiation and earth's temperature over the last 20 years- it showed that while solar radiation has decreased, earth's temperature has increased- i already brought up the concept of lag which you chose to ignore but is certainly relevant to any comparison like this- i questioned the objectivity of any scientist who would literally say "This should settle the debate" which, amongst people who know science, is a big no-no- just because temperatures have risen and solar radiation has decreased over the last 20 years doesnt mean solar radiation has no effect on earth's temperatures...it simply means the observed effect over the last 20 years has a net negative- even if solar activity hasnt had any effect on climate in the last 20 years, thats not the same as you claiming this study "disproved the link between solar activity and climate change"
7/11/2007 2:00:27 PM
but that's very suspect coming from you when it seems the only ideas in those threads that you contend are ones that are in support of anthro-climate change
7/11/2007 2:13:22 PM
whats very suspect? i just have a problem with people saying "everyone in the scientific community knows for a fact that its humans and co2 that are causing catastrophic global warming"...i'll be glad to call them out on it because they're completely jumping to conclusions about things they don't understandif somebody says "global warming is a complete farce made up by the environmentalists and the temps havent even risen" there are plenty of people who would shoot that down before i even got the chance to do itand i still wonder if nutsmackr knows what a sunspot isand i think i'm literally having to convice Boone that the sun affects the climate on the Earth...i mean i think most animals realize that]
7/11/2007 2:17:18 PM
I don't believe it. A thread involving TreeTwista where there was a misunderstanding about word choice, and an accusation of semantics was made. It's...shocking.
7/11/2007 2:40:37 PM
i dont believe it...blind hate comes in and talks about me without cussing or calling names...shocking]
7/11/2007 2:43:55 PM
If scientists keep on feeding us shit like this, they're going to lose the little credibility they have left.Everyone knows the sun warms the planet. I only have to step outside to see that.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 3:08 PM. Reason : fail]
7/11/2007 3:08:31 PM
needs italics and scare quotes."scientists"
7/11/2007 3:51:50 PM
the sun doesnt have any effect on the earth's climate
7/11/2007 4:01:00 PM
Science is the biggest liberal hoax yet. We've been deceived by it for decades, but the tide is finally turning.
7/11/2007 4:02:00 PM
^^Are you so terrible at arguing that you need to resort to strawmen like that to save face?[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 4:04 PM. Reason : rhetorical question]
7/11/2007 4:03:11 PM
lol i'm not the one that needs to save faceafter all i'm not the one to put a BBC article over the common sense that the sun plays a part in the climatebut i guess since your fellow history major nutsmackr posted it, it must be true!]
7/11/2007 4:07:29 PM
I was listening to Rush earlier today. His reaction to the report was about the same as Twista's. Obviously, the idea that sun doesn't warm our planet doesn't go over well with the common man. Scientists have gone too far this time. They must think we'll believe anything.
7/11/2007 4:10:30 PM
I totally talked to one of my professors for 10 minutes after class one day. He said the same exact thing.
7/11/2007 4:13:20 PM
Now wait, did someone say in these articles that the sun doesn't affect climate? That's not what these researchers are saying at all, if that's how someone's understanding it. They're saying that the sun and cosmic rays don't affect the climate AS MUCH AS we are currently seeing, and carbon has a MUCH larger effect.
7/11/2007 4:15:32 PM
^^nah actually i think when i was about 3 or 4 years old my parents told me that the sun heats and lights the earthbut you totally read a BBC article that your fellow history major posted]
7/11/2007 4:15:34 PM
I was also a history major. Maybe that explains things.
7/11/2007 4:25:39 PM
^^^ Don't even argue against that. He's just being retarded.[Edited on July 11, 2007 at 4:26 PM. Reason : .]
7/11/2007 4:25:58 PM
At least he's not a scientist. (Yes, it's becoming a dirty word.)
7/11/2007 4:27:59 PM
7/11/2007 4:29:21 PM
According the scientists, the sun's output doesn't explain the recent warming (since 1980 or so).But who believes them?
7/11/2007 4:35:31 PM