10/24/2006 8:39:12 PM
i love how Earl's threads get many pages fastby the way
10/24/2006 8:49:28 PM
10/24/2006 9:39:40 PM
NO MORE OF THIS SHIT[Edited on October 26, 2006 at 12:59 PM. Reason : carzin]
10/24/2006 9:49:06 PM
Earl for dad-gom student body president.
10/24/2006 9:50:39 PM
^^[user]beardawg[/user] please don't stand for this.
10/24/2006 11:00:29 PM
^your stupid ass should be suspended before anyone else here
10/24/2006 11:01:29 PM
don't feed the trollFIRE CHUCK
10/24/2006 11:30:02 PM
this has to be stinger
10/24/2006 11:40:41 PM
10/25/2006 12:08:56 AM
I'm curious how the best fan ever calls out one guy for a loss, real team player bud, you're a great fan! 2 picks are bad, but in no way did Evans stick out as the sole factor like other previous NCSU QB's. Maybe his two previous performances (and maybe even 3, Wake wasn't bad) cuts him slack because of what we've witnessed previous to Evans. You are saying our O-line dominated??? If you consider our tackles to "dominate" at the collegiate level, I'd certainly have to assume you think Pace, Ogden, and McKinnie were Jesus reincarnated at tackle. Also, every real fan vents after a tough loss, some people do it through a message board, other people throw things, some people sit in disarray, everyone has their deal. While it does get tiresome to read some people's disdain over and over, it's just a message board, and a collegiate one at that, don'tt ake it too seriously. And if there was anyway to "square off" in an NCAA football/basketball sports trivia, you'd likely have a line down Hillsborough with 50-75% of those owning you.
10/25/2006 12:37:56 AM
10/25/2006 1:35:18 AM
10/25/2006 3:38:28 AM
^^ you are not the schwab
10/25/2006 3:49:40 AM
since when did being a good fan mean you had to be blindly retarded about the situation your team was in? i mean shit, i'm a titans fan and yes they could go on a run and win out and go to the super bowl but it isn't going to happen. it's great that you have an unreal optimistic approach, but don't act like because you hold onto the slimest chances of us winning an acc title that you are a better fan. Also, losing 2 conference games in a row against teams that are in the middle of the conference at best while still having what i believe are the two best ACC teams coming up doesn't look to promising. actually i consider the people that get on here angry to be a better fan then you sometimes, with your stupid posts thinking your so great. anger to me means people care, and want us to do well more then anything. there is no bandwagon, its a fucking university, you act like after our 2 loses 3000 people tried to transfer to clemson. if you were a real sports fan you would understand that that is how it works, your team does well you love it, when the bad times come you have to vent in some way but come the following weekend your at that tv/stadium rooting them on again. i know i'm a bigger wolfpack fan then you, i wouldn't even want your dumbass on my bandwagon.
10/25/2006 7:50:20 AM
If we lose to UVA, Chuck should resign. Cavs are garbage this year.
10/25/2006 11:31:19 AM
does andymac ever know what he's talking about?if we beat clemson we will be ahead of them.
10/25/2006 11:37:44 AM
^^or UNC or ECUFIRE CHUCK
10/25/2006 11:54:10 AM
^^It doesn't matter anyway, because it's not gonna happen. And the argument remains valid, if I don't think that boston college will lose another game then I would be classified as a bad fan by earl.[Edited on October 25, 2006 at 11:57 AM. Reason : ]
10/25/2006 11:57:14 AM
^^^ you dumb fucker, if we beat clemson we still have to hope BC loses (and that the loss isnt to maryland or wake). so andymac was correct in saying if we beat clemson, we're not automatically going to win the division. and for the record, if we manage to beat clemson and GT, we officially have the biggest WHAT THE FUCK team ever.
10/25/2006 12:01:28 PM
slant-eyed mofo
10/25/2006 12:02:28 PM
well, maryland beat us and we play UVA this weekend. I said that I'd jump off a bridge if we lost to both, so I'm standing on the rail right now. Anyone wanna join me? Hopefully Evans and company will save me.[Edited on October 25, 2006 at 12:21 PM. Reason : ]
10/25/2006 12:20:15 PM
10/25/2006 12:32:21 PM
10/25/2006 12:47:51 PM
10/25/2006 1:22:33 PM
Everybody who does this ^ and ^^ gay shit should be suspended for a couple days. We get the point.
10/25/2006 1:29:25 PM
^ cosign
10/25/2006 5:49:52 PM
Seriously, I can understand if you don't like me but ruining threads is childish.
10/25/2006 5:55:21 PM
10/25/2006 6:09:48 PM
10/25/2006 6:21:25 PM
I like to victor!!
10/25/2006 6:22:50 PM
10/25/2006 6:24:35 PM
For God's sake Earl, victor is a fucking noun.
10/25/2006 6:26:11 PM
10/25/2006 6:49:51 PM
they are 1-dementional either way
10/25/2006 6:52:41 PM
i victored on your mom's tits last night
10/25/2006 8:50:24 PM
oh sick burn
10/25/2006 8:54:38 PM
Yeah, Gt still remains 1 dimensional either way. Championship teams are well rounded. Our team would be more rounded if we could go "down field" with our passing game, instead of when our backs are us against the wall. When teams key in on our run, we lose games. We haven't proved that we can carry a win (an entire game) through passing. Throwing hail mary bombs don't count.
10/25/2006 10:18:23 PM
but isnt a hail mary bomb the apit of me of "down field"?
10/25/2006 10:20:32 PM
I think you mean "epitome", and yeah it basically is down field. But we need to arrange down field passing plays in drives. Hail marys won't always work for us.
10/25/2006 10:23:11 PM
dementionalapit of me
10/25/2006 10:23:43 PM
we can go downfield, our OC just saves those plays for when we are behind. brilliant.
10/25/2006 10:29:17 PM
You fail to pay attention to the plays. They are balanced throughout the entire game. He does not save plays!
10/25/2006 10:30:26 PM
10/25/2006 10:31:58 PM
bullshit, we always play not to lose in the first half, running/screen passing the hell out of the ball, and when we get behind we actually try some longer passes and they work.[Edited on October 25, 2006 at 10:32 PM. Reason : fds]
10/25/2006 10:32:34 PM
10/25/2006 10:35:08 PM
Thats just false man. It might appear that way to you, but its untrue. We run the same/similar passing plays the entire game.It just that, at the end of the game the "defenses" change. They back further off, leaving the middle of the field exposed.
10/25/2006 10:36:15 PM
no. we obviously run more little screens and stuff in the first half when we're not completely desparate for points.
10/25/2006 10:37:10 PM
I'll give you that overall the play calling has been fairly balanced: 223 rushes to 197 pass attempts. But I want to see a breakdown quarter by quarter and what type of passes they were.
10/25/2006 10:41:24 PM
I study the game films so I know. I think you're operating off hearsay.[Edited on October 25, 2006 at 10:44 PM. Reason : .]
10/25/2006 10:44:10 PM