the point is that he was able to find the weakness of the DBs and he proved it to be very successful and efficient...I know that it might not work against many teams, but who else in our conference has solid DBs???? Clemson maybe, but that's pretty much it. I know teams are going to be looking for this now, but if he's able to continue to find the weakness, then he will be great..also it wasnt just evans...B&B turned it up a few notches in the second half....they had a huge sparkWOLFPACK ROLL!!!
10/6/2006 9:16:27 AM
I think if they traded evans to oakland they would win at least 3 games and randy moss' stats would triple.
10/6/2006 9:37:31 AM
Man Evans christian beliefs are really being tested right now.Relatively unattractive guy thats now the schools hero?Id be out there absolutely slaying bitches and he's supposed to wait til marriage?
10/6/2006 10:04:24 AM
no one is going to try and say Evans has a huge arm...but he has plenty of zip to get the ball to the receivers at the college leveleven on some of those longer 'lob' throws that some of you are calling them, they were thirty yards down the field and high enough to where only the receiver could get to them....he has to have a little bit of an armand on that 3rd and long to dunlap, 3rd and 12 i believe, that was a slant type of route and he got there in plenty of timehes got what qb's need the most anyway: POISE and guts
10/6/2006 10:37:02 AM
why the hell does chuck reply by saying one word, repeating the word, and then elaborating when he has been interviewed after the game?
10/6/2006 1:41:19 PM
10/6/2006 1:57:51 PM
With receivers like we have (James etc) I'm perfectly happy if our QB just lets the receivers run to the ball.However it did seem like his "jump balls" were well placed where the defense had little chance to get the ball. I haven't watched the DVR or anything to confirm this but thats what it looked like at the game.Anyway I don't understand why people are complaining that his arm sucks etc. He's got good stats and we're winning. I could care less if he underarms his throws if its working.
10/6/2006 2:12:52 PM
assessment:-above average intelligence-pretty good arm-great poise-intense focusbest combination of traits we've had since Riverssome supporting evidence for the above assessment:-no int's thus far-several TD passes-no major blown plays, fumbles, lost yards, etc-wins against ranked teams-players seem to have trememdous confidence in him-i don't think he's been sacked too much eitherother reasons i like him:-he grew up a State fan-dreamed of playing for the team-hometown public high school kid-not a superb athelete, but knows how to get it done-relies heavily on cerebral cortex, but seems to have good instincts too
10/6/2006 3:36:43 PM