More acrobatics and bullshit.If you didn't want to enter into any mode of explanation, then you shouldn't have even entered the thread. You started by trying to explain something with your Bible quote. When I expressed disagreement, you claimed that it's simply "my problem" and beated an immediate and total retreat.Weak shit, man.
9/17/2006 4:38:10 PM
Yeah Faggot, you are welcome to "win" this
9/17/2006 4:38:44 PM
It's not about winning. It's about getting it right. The only people who made this a win/lose situation are you guys, and you handed yourself the loss. Fucking amazing.
9/17/2006 4:42:25 PM
you're right, its in my mind that you seek out threads on religion so you can troll and win themyou win again man
9/17/2006 4:45:37 PM
^ do you live behind mitches tavern
9/17/2006 4:48:32 PM
Soon to be replacing "$" for the official sign of money:
9/17/2006 4:50:19 PM
9/17/2006 4:54:11 PM
It's cute how they get so scared that something I might say will keep them up at night. Still waiting for that IM.
9/17/2006 4:56:43 PM
you got that e-30 all ragged out with the roll cage in it
9/17/2006 5:02:03 PM
Well things took a bad turn, but I'll go ahead and share my beliefs on the subject. First of all, I've never heard of the "eye of a needle"="small passage in the mountains". *shrug*In any case, I don't think being rich means going straight to hell. I certainly believe that if someone made wealth their sole goal in life and placed it above the needs of their family and helping others it would be un-Christian, so to speak. After all, "the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil"(1 Timothy 6:10). But according to the Bible, no one on earth is qualified to say who will or will not get into heaven. Jesus said this when he said "Judge not, lest ye be judged". Paul backs this up when he says:
9/17/2006 5:33:31 PM
Antonio, you have a couple of pretty valid points -- but let me bring forward one objection:
9/17/2006 5:40:51 PM
Well, it wouldn't be unreasonable to say that Jesus might have meant that order specifically for that man. However, new converts also gave away all their goods (I think this happened in Acts). Things are very different now. While many people are poor, in the developed nations a majority of them have a roof over their heads and food to eat (even if very little).I think the larger message would be "Be eager to give and don't become wrapped up in your worldly possessions." Doing that means something different in this day and age IMO. Don't get me wrong, I don't think we should have the mindset of that man mentioned at the beginning of the Time article. That's outrageous. But if someone really sets their heart and mind on using their wealth to help other people, actively going out and making things happen instead of throwing money at a problem and walking away, I believe they are doing a good (and therefore Christian) thing. And this:
9/17/2006 6:22:44 PM
Jesus wasn't a capitalist, he was a humanist.
9/17/2006 6:38:10 PM
actually its not impossible for a camel to enter the eye of a needle, its just really difficultbut thats one of those understanding the context thing and knowing what they are talking about
9/17/2006 7:55:00 PM
9/17/2006 8:06:30 PM
the traditional understanding is that the eye of a needle is either a gate or a narrow passage where to get a camel through one must first stop the camel and take off all of the packs. so its possible but difficult. another explanation is a linguistic one that points out that the word actually means rope (which has a similar name because the rope is made from camel hair).[Edited on September 17, 2006 at 8:28 PM. Reason : retard]
9/17/2006 8:28:26 PM
they had needles in the bible
9/17/2006 8:38:05 PM
who gives a shit about this?
9/17/2006 8:40:40 PM
I DO ASS HOLE
9/17/2006 8:42:50 PM
9/17/2006 9:00:11 PM
youre the one that brought up the needle giants use on their huge clothes you damn water baby
9/17/2006 9:14:22 PM
I was doing it to make fun of your "well... it IS possible because ANYTHING is possible with God" bullshit escape tactic.Not everything is possible with God. Think about it for more than 15 seconds, and you can come up with at least one example.
9/17/2006 9:18:12 PM
i said it was possible because of what it means you moroni even explained why
9/17/2006 9:19:52 PM
And in explaining why validated my earlier point -- Jesus wants the rich to give up what they own. It can't get any more clear than the language he uses.
9/17/2006 9:20:51 PM
this allegory is pretty clear
9/17/2006 9:22:06 PM
Yes. Give up what you own. Can't get much clearer. So why don't Christians do it? Probably because it's not as convenient as hating faggots.
9/17/2006 9:23:00 PM
im agreeing with you that they are wrong, if you ask them about it they're all "OMG PARABLE OF THE TALENTS, OMG HE WANTS ME TO GET RICH"Jesus was basically a socialist
9/17/2006 9:25:03 PM
Yeah he was a pinko alright. That's why so many Christians ignore him.
9/17/2006 9:28:03 PM
9/17/2006 9:28:33 PM
So Jesus didn't mean what he said when he told the man to give up everything he owned? Or was he being remarkably harsh on that one guy because he didn't like him?
9/17/2006 9:36:09 PM
Mark 12:28-31 Now one of the experts in the law came and heard them debating. When he saw that Jesus answered them well, he asked him, “Which commandment is the most important of all?” 29 Jesus answered, “The most important is: ‘Listen, Israel, the Lord our God is one. 30 Love the Lord your God with your whole heart, with your whole soul, with your whole mind, and with your whole strength.’ 31 The second is: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”
9/17/2006 9:40:55 PM
I have no problem with most of what Christ preached. Some of the shit is far out there -- shit I wouldn't do (and yes, I hold Biblical literalists to that standard).Most of what I disagree with in Christianity comes in the epistles.
9/17/2006 9:50:23 PM
i guess im a fairly devout christian (though no literalist) but damn i think paul was a choad
9/17/2006 10:06:02 PM
9/17/2006 10:07:42 PM
Christ understood that in order for that man to achieve salvation that was necessary. I really think that was meant for him and the overall message is something deeper concerning charity and materialism.
9/17/2006 10:15:35 PM
"No servant can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." [Luke 16:13]
9/18/2006 5:28:14 AM
I've always considered the love of money to be the sin, not the possession of it. That is why it is hard but not impossible for the rich man to enter heaven. Hard because the rich man will have a greater predisposition to place the accumulation of riches first in their life but not impossible because the simple act of having riches does not guarantee that you will put them before God.In this case Jesus was able to discern that the rich man's heart was focused on wealth and it would appear to have been the case because the man was saddened at what he was told. Jesus was teaching the rich man a lesson and the man was able to learn that he would rather keep his riches than have eternal life.I think the lesson here is that people have to be willing to give up anything in order to attain eternal life. They have to prove to God and themselves that they are willing to put God before all things. If riches are your sticking point you have to be willing to give them up. If you are poor and having too much pride to ask for help is your sticking point then you have to be willing to overcome that.
9/18/2006 7:45:31 AM
^that's the most plausable stand on the issue in the entire thread so far
9/18/2006 10:36:16 AM
^^^^^^ and ^^^^^^^ what are your beefs with paul and the epistles?
9/18/2006 12:40:42 PM
Mother Theresa was destitute./thread
9/18/2006 12:53:22 PM
for those of us who aren't ncsu students anymore and aren't subscribers, could someone please paste the full text of the article? i'm interested in reading it.
9/18/2006 1:47:05 PM
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~agbrunso/timesarticle.txtIt was too long to post. Probably want to open it in WordPad or something[Edited on September 18, 2006 at 2:36 PM. Reason : stupid tags]
9/18/2006 2:36:26 PM
jbtilley has a good interpretation of the passage. It's also a good demonstration of how having a literalist interpretation is inconsistent. However, it's a good way to read it, and I like it.As far as BigDave's concern -- what's my beef with Paul? How long you got? Hahaha.. that would require a whole new thread and a lot of time.
9/18/2006 5:39:53 PM
9/18/2006 11:32:24 PM
^word [Edited on September 19, 2006 at 12:29 AM. Reason : to the Matthew passage]
9/19/2006 12:29:17 AM
there is nothing wrong with owning posessions - it's when the posessions own you, and you focus your whole life and energy on obtaining or keeping them.
9/19/2006 10:11:30 AM
My View of Material WealthI can honestly say that if I didn't have certain material temptations in life, I'd be a lot less stressed out and more focused on the more important things. There is something spiritual and powerful about denying one self of material pleasures and being wise when it comes to fulfilling your material needs.
9/19/2006 3:04:34 PM
The whole point of that quote is that as a Christian you are supposed to put God first and then others before yourself (or at least love them as you love yourself). Having money is not bad, but it tends to be the case that when you have a lot of it you begin to make that your priority. It can lead to greed and selfishness, and some even idolize money. If you can be rich and use your money for good, and not let it control your life, then there is nothing wrong with it.
9/20/2006 10:50:21 AM
You know I read this yesterday at the oral surgeon's office. The people saying God wants them to be rich are making a huge jump in logic from "God wants to bless us" to "God wants us to bless us with money". Blessings come in all forms, not just $texas. Friends, family, health, peace, etc...all more valuble that money.
9/20/2006 11:00:25 AM
9/20/2006 11:08:16 AM