lay off the yayo
9/7/2006 1:05:10 PM
haha...that cartoon is the greatest thing i have ever seen....and the greatest part is...salis believes every word of it!!!and salis....lets count...how many more self-fullfilling prophecies can you set up??
9/7/2006 1:07:03 PM
9/7/2006 3:21:52 PM
does salisburyboy just stay up all night doing yay and listening to Coast to Coast AM?
9/7/2006 3:23:00 PM
hahaha...i love coast to coast"...and then...just before we hit the fog....and light appeared...and they was straaange looking critters all over the place...then....all 'a sudden.....they was gone.."
9/7/2006 3:26:25 PM
Here are some videos of actual building implosions:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3734778582740389904&q=implosionHear the deafening explosions long before the building even moves?http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6979955002470780153&q=implosionhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6209867556562706196&q=implosionhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5446838557512388694&q=implosionhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5360235832416833797&q=implosionThis is the same building. Notice the clearly visible explosions all over the building? Notice how the building collapse begins at the bottom instead of the top falling first?http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5515424451823800690&q=implosionSame features, different building. Loud explosions. Collapse begins at the bottom, not the top. I know that you love to point out the cloud of dust shot from the window during the collapse of the WTC, but the simple fact is that there is absolutely no need to set off additional explosions as the building is collapsing - momentum will do the job.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8719593880031165898&q=implosionHeres the same thing in Raleigh, no less. There is no need to set off more charges during collapse. What you saw during the WTC collapse was air being forced out as the floors pancaked.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7000444892387259083&q=implosionHeres a building in Las Vegas. Notice the many clearly visible sequenced explosions? Where were those when the WTC came down? One plume of dust coming out of a window as the building is collapsing is not evidence of a controlled demolition.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6449270076349123045&q=implosionHeres another one. Notice the explosions all took place before the collapse, not during.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4451252877216031192&q=implosionHeres a dorm in Minnesota. Loud and clearly visible sequenced explosions prior to collapse. There are even plumes of dust ejected from the windows during collapse, just like the WTC. Notice that you don't hear any explosion accompanying the dust plumes.There are a lot more videos out there if you want to see more. All of those buildings were significantly smaller than the World Trade Center, yet still produced deafening explosions. How many tons of explosives would have been needed to bring down two 110 story skyscrapers? Why doesn't a single video of the event include the sound of sequenced explosions?Look at the explosions themselves. They all happened before the collapse. In every single video you see and hear charges going off followed by a dead silence, and then the collapse of the building. Ever single piece of evidence that you bring to the table lacks this. Instead you point to puffs of dust near windows as the prrof of explosives. Find me a video that features explosives being set off underneath a collapsing structure as it falls.All of these building begin collapse at the bottom. The tops of the WTC (above the point of impact) fell into the rest of the builing with sufficient momentum to bring the towers down. Find me a video of this technique being used to collapse a high rise.FEEL FREE TO ADDRESS THISIts funny, I was actually watching the History Channel special on the survivors in stairwell B who were actually inside the WTC when it collapsed. They mentioned the "bang-bang-bang-bang" sounds and stated matter of factly that it was the sound of floors collapsing onto one another. They mentioned that the building was swaying violently the entire time that they were in it - even to the point where they had trouble standing up. I really wish that you would use genuine scientific analysis instead of just using the words of panic stricken survivors and reporters taken out of context.I would also love to see you address some of the "logical fallacies" that you claim http://www.debunking911.com/ is full of. Right now you're just dismissing it because you can't refute any of its points.
9/7/2006 3:32:48 PM
9/7/2006 4:04:13 PM
9/7/2006 7:25:24 PM
mr joshua, stop trollinglollers
9/7/2006 7:30:48 PM