I'd be interested in seeing if each time jump occurs somewhere ahead of the last, mod 3, or not.

11/27/2006 1:49:23 AM

I don't think people are enjoying having to sort this stuff out for themselves. Or, in other words, if the movie is supposed to "stand alone," it shouldn't require so much analysis. But I think that's a little lazy.

11/27/2006 1:49:26 AM

Like I said earlier in the thread, it really took me a day to make up my mind about this movie. I walked out saying, "WTF...

I like movies that take a little bit of thinking to understand. Movies don't always have to dumb shit down for the general audience

11/27/2006 1:51:42 AM

i'm a big softy

11/27/2006 9:58:29 AM

Did anybody else see the resembalance to the uhm 'birth canal' in the end sequence of the film as the future character was approaching the dead star through the nebula?

^^^ He said the time jumps were mathematical in nature- though he didn't specify how exactly, he did say that it was a palindrome.



[Edited on November 27, 2006 at 10:22 PM. Reason : oh yeah]

11/27/2006 10:21:07 PM

^

Quote :

"Did anybody else see the resembalance to the uhm 'birth canal' in the end sequence of the film as the future character was approaching the dead star through the nebula?"

I did

11/27/2006 11:01:35 PM

while i'm logged in and posting

this movie was beautiful and captivating and powerful when i watched it

and is only better when i think about it

11/27/2006 11:21:48 PM

yeah I wanted to ask Aronofsky if that was intentional.....but tact and fear of complete embarrassment overruled.

11/27/2006 11:34:36 PM

I didn't notice that at all the first time, but I totally see where you're coming from. I love movies where going over it multiple times brings out something different.

11/27/2006 11:39:24 PM

wait

someone in this thread saw it in the presence of DA?

11/28/2006 12:02:05 AM

Jesus, that was wonderful.

11/28/2006 3:15:17 PM

man this movie sucked my butt

1/28/2007 3:44:58 AM