-2- for j00s

(and cheesists)

6/28/2006 2:22:02 PM

It cracks me up that he makes a big deal out of possible plargiarism (even though he has no proof the Einstein stole anyone's ideas), yet when I presented clear evidence that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was a plagiarized hoax, he ignored it and said that it doesn't matter if it was plagiarized because it's true.

6/28/2006 2:26:11 PM

6/28/2006 2:28:41 PM

http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=417683

6/28/2006 2:29:06 PM

Quote :

"vert All American 667 Posts user info edit post do we need to post salisburyboy's real name again?"

Matthew Williams, valedictorian CE, class of 02

6/28/2006 2:38:19 PM

^3x

omfg hahaha

6/28/2006 3:42:55 PM

[Edited on June 28, 2006 at 3:46 PM. Reason : salsbury = pier bernard ]

6/28/2006 3:46:17 PM

this is by far the funniest trolling yet salisburyboy. While I understand the cacophony of voices leveled against the boy, I'm glad theDuke866 has allowed us to partake in this nonsense. I think we all know it's nonsense, probably even the boy himself.

Einstein's equation E=mc^2 is not just a stand-alone equation. It's derived and interpreted in terms of a cogent whole of physical discussion. We know length contraction was thought of by Lorentz before Einstein ( that's why it's called Lorentz contraction ), and for that matter all of Newtonian mechanics is included in special relativity. Anyway, special relativity would likely been found with or without Einstein. It can be derived on the basis of assuming electromagnetism is true, so the equations of special relativity are probably not Einstein's greatest gift to physics. What he gave was a physical interpretation, so equations aren't really the big thing when it came to special relativity. General Relativity would have been difficult to imagine w/o the physical interpretation given by Einstein, if we had endorsed the earlier ideas by Lorentz and other's that used some combination of ad-hoc mechanical effects and the ether then we would not have been as focused on issues of coordinate invariance. The idea of general coordinate invariance is a natural generalization of special relativity written in 4D-notation. So, sure Einstein didn't do everything but that's how physics works, it's a confluence of many authors work, Einstein just gets more credit cause he did alot of the hardest work.

Besides, as nastoute pointed out, Einstein did alot more than just relativity. I must say I think he was a very selfish and bad man if half of what I saw on the recent PBS special about his 1st wife was correct. But, if you want to give an example of an overly credited scientist then Hawkings is my pick. There are many who have done more interesting and influential work during his career.

6/28/2006 4:00:41 PM

How can we know who is controlling Hawkings computer. Maybe he is just a front.

6/28/2006 5:41:49 PM

Quote :

"if you want to give an example of an overly credited scientist then Hawkings is my pick"

Hawking captures the public interest because he's overcome such great odds to be where he is.

sure someone might be smarter or more prolific, but hes the only one with a muscle-wasting variant of ALS who has done theoretical work on black holes and quantum cosmology, while making them accessible to the lay person.

and FYI, mathman, you can sniff that the current Lucasian Chair of Mathematics at Cambridge is just an overrated physicist, but you should at least spell his name correctly. Otherwise someone might assume you don't really know what you're talking about.






[Edited on June 28, 2006 at 7:20 PM. Reason : ]

6/28/2006 6:55:53 PM

Perhaps, but I don't really care so much what people think about my spelling. And if that is what you base your opinion of my knowledge of physics on then to bad for you. I would hope that content would outweight grammar, but then I suppose you'd have to understand the content...

6/28/2006 8:05:23 PM

Irony:

Someone who constantly posts nothing but other people's writing that accuses someone else of plagarism.

6/28/2006 8:22:00 PM

^ftw

6/28/2006 8:55:28 PM

[Edited on June 28, 2006 at 9:24 PM. Reason : .]

6/28/2006 9:23:23 PM

6/28/2006 10:21:51 PM

Quote :

"politics, social issues, financials. basically anything serious."

6/28/2006 10:43:51 PM

It's a good thing Salisburyboy is here to show us what's really important in the world.

6/29/2006 12:42:01 AM

Wait, you mean scientists use the results of their peers to develop and improve knowledge of the mechanics of the universe?

$100 says that salisburyboy cannot name the discovery for which Einstein won his Nobel prize (without looking it up).

6/29/2006 12:44:42 AM

^ that's not fair to the boy, his only means of communication is cutting and pasting, if he doesn't look it up then how can he copy it?

6/29/2006 2:05:29 AM

THE JEWS INVENTED THE SUN

that nobel prize was rigged.

[Edited on June 29, 2006 at 3:41 AM. Reason : 243324]

6/29/2006 3:40:23 AM

yes, but he did not make Thriller.

6/29/2006 3:50:22 AM

An extensive paper on the Einstein fraud:

The Einstein Hoax By- H. E. Retic
http://www.members.aol.com/einsteinhoax/hoax.htm

6/30/2006 1:19:21 PM

^theres no way in hell you read all of that

6/30/2006 1:19:42 PM

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/11/15/einstein_relativity/

Quote :

"Was Einstein a plagiarist? By Lucy Sherriff Published Monday 15th November 2004 A theoretical physicist at the University of Nevada has published a paper alleging that Einstein did not derive the gravitational field equations at the heart of the General Theory of Relativity, and might in fact have copied key equations from fellow physicist David Hilbert. The two scientists were working in the same area in 1915, and were developing their theories independently but concurrently. Each submitted papers for publication throughout November of that year. The two were also corresponding about their research, making it hard to unravel exactly who knew what, and when. As a consequence the question of which researcher can claim priority has been the subject of some debate. Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg says that contrary to the conclusions in a paper published in Science in 1997, Einstein did have the opportunity to plagiarise Hilbert's work. He claims that printer's proofs of Hilbert's paper have been tampered with, and that a key part of the derivation had been excised. In their 1997 paper, Corry, Renn and Stachel concluded that Hilbert altered his published paper to include the correct forms of the gravitation field equations after seeing Einstein's final paper. But Winterberg argues that this is impossible. Winterberg suggests that someone deliberately tampered with the document, specifically to support claims for Einstein's priority. He compares the 'mutilated' document with published papers, and notes that certain forms of Hilbert's notation were only used by Einstein at a later date. "My analysis of Hilbert's mutilated proofs therefore cannot prove that Einstein copied from Hilbert," he says. "It proves less, which is that it cannot be proved that Einstein could not have copied from Hilbert. But it proves that Hilbert had not copied from Einstein, as it has been insinuated following the paper by Corry, Renn and Stachel." Winterberg concludes that three people should be given credit for developing the general theory of relativity: Einstein, for recognising the shape of the problem, Grossmann for his insight that the contracted Riemann tensor was key to solving the problem, and Hilbert for completing the gravitational field theory equations."

6/30/2006 1:28:59 PM

bravo duke

6/30/2006 1:31:43 PM

Quote :

" Salisburyboy \ \ ^^^^^ { . . } | > | \ o / --- | S S s \|/ Pier s s s | / S_ _s S_ ^ / \ \ \ \ \ \ ___||____||_/_\_||_ _____\ \___\ \___\ \_____/ ---||----||-----||- | / || || || | SS Reality / ~~~||~~~~||~~~~~||~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/~~~~~~~~~~~ "

6/30/2006 1:36:29 PM

The Einstein Hoax: The Disastrous Intellectual War on Common Sense
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1588202356/203-1458944-3093509

Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0971962987/002-0969391-9782460?v=glance&n=283155

6/30/2006 1:36:53 PM

Quote :

" Salisburyboy \ \ ^^^^^ { . . } | > | \ o / --- | S S s \|/ Pier s s s | / S_ _s S_ ^ / \ \ \ \ \ \ ___||____||_/_\_||_ _____\ \___\ \___\ \_____/ ---||----||-----||- | / || || || | SS Reality / ~~~||~~~~||~~~~~||~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/~~~~~~~~~~~ "

6/30/2006 1:39:09 PM

Albert Einstein - When We Think of Genius, We See His Face
http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist/profile/einstein.html

salisbury i know this link wont mean anything since its only time magazine and its not as credible as members.aol.com

6/30/2006 1:40:52 PM

ahahahah

6/30/2006 1:50:49 PM

When I think of an inbred moron who couldn't tie his shoes, married his cousin, had 2 mentally deficient/ill children (one of whom was diagnosed with schizophrenia and died in an asylum), plagiarized the work of others, and is held up by the Jewish-controlled media as some kind of superhuman "genius"....I think of Einstein's fugly mug.

6/30/2006 1:58:38 PM

i've never met him so i dont know

6/30/2006 2:00:02 PM

This is obvious trolling by salisburyboy now

if it hasnt been obvious before now that he doesnt believe his own crap, it's obvious now

go figure that Duke is the only one fooled

6/30/2006 2:05:31 PM

HE DOESN'T EVEN LOOK REAL!

6/30/2006 2:08:56 PM

Quote :

"Someone who constantly posts nothing but other people's writing that accuses someone else of plagarism."

6/30/2006 2:14:14 PM

Quote :

"2 mentally deficient/ill children"

one of his two mentally deficient children grew up to be a college prof.

6/30/2006 2:22:22 PM

I wish salisburyboy would put a picture of himself in his gallery

6/30/2006 6:06:03 PM

that's like asking him to post logical thoughts...

6/30/2006 6:08:03 PM

This is pobably the worst thread in the soap box

6/30/2006 6:17:03 PM

probably? PROBABLY?

there's room for debate on that?

6/30/2006 6:22:05 PM

sorry

6/30/2006 8:20:15 PM

I had sex with Albert Einstein, and he kept calling this one move "The Einstein." I tried to explain to him that he did not invent the ole butt thumbing, but he called me a liar and from then on made a point of always saying "The Einstein" in bed.

6/30/2006 8:25:13 PM

To be fair, since there is no true static frame of reference with regards to space and time, you can't relaly say for certain that he didn't invent the butt-thumb.

6/30/2006 8:29:07 PM

^That's what he said!!!

6/30/2006 8:39:57 PM

i got a thumb for yer butt...

6/30/2006 8:57:03 PM

spookyjon, funny and creative.

burr0sback, obvious and obnoxious.

6/30/2006 9:24:37 PM

Quote :

"Yet another myth of the Jewish-controlled media. Einstein was not this "genius of geniuses", and the j00z are NOT this master race with superhuman intelligence."

Fucking sweet. j00z. Just when I thought salisburyballs couldn't get nuttier. There he goes again!

[Edited on July 1, 2006 at 1:56 AM. Reason : oops]

7/1/2006 1:55:57 AM

salisburyboy... you so funny

7/1/2006 1:58:40 AM

quick

somebody invent the 3-d snapshot

7/1/2006 2:03:34 AM

I'm just sitting here laughing at the paradox that he's trying to pass off.

1) Jews are able to clandestinely control the world media, business, government, religion, politics. etc.

2) Jews aren't smart. In fact, the smartest one was a moron.

7/5/2006 11:47:24 AM