ahahahaha
4/19/2006 11:39:27 AM
jim brown
4/19/2006 11:55:52 AM
Greg Golden[/thread][/credibility]
4/19/2006 12:01:06 PM
this thread is stupid
4/19/2006 12:04:01 PM
Lance Armstrong is not the best in cycling, everYes, he ended his career with an unprecedented seventh consecutive victory in the Tour de France. He brought the sport of cycling into light of the general public, but anybody that knows anything about cycling would never make such a claim.He is the best of his generation, but we shouldn't compare him to other eras.Armstrong has proved that he has been the greatest rider in the Tour, but that was the only race he really competed in to win.
4/19/2006 12:07:09 PM
tennis: rod laver. won the grand slam on two separate occasions ('62 and '69). he may have won more, but was not allowed to play in grand slams between 1963 and 1968 because he had turned pro. After the beginning of the open era in 1968, pros were able to compete in grand slams, and he won all four grand slams the following year.
4/19/2006 12:08:53 PM
Walter Payton, David Thompson, That Wayne fella who played a few years in Edmonton, Dale Murphy, John McEnroe and Hulk Hogan.
4/19/2006 12:12:48 PM
you've gotta be kidding with the john mcenroe pick. mcenroe is one of my FAVORITE tennis players of all time, but there's no real way to argue he is the best of all time.also, i could see steffi graf being argued as one of the best tennis players of all time as well. she won 22 grand slam titles. that's nothing to sneeze at.
4/19/2006 12:16:00 PM
When you look at the guys McEnroe had to play against and the things that were going on in his life because of how fucked up his head was against what he still managed to accomplish...yeah, I'd say he was the greatest of all time.If someone had set him down and straightened him out, there's no telling what he could have done.Steffi is an interesting pick, but women's tennis was in a serious lull for a majority of that time. If only the little stabby-stabby had never happened, we would have been treated to some epic women's tennis.
4/19/2006 12:31:37 PM
no doubt mcenroe was a beast. but i think laver has him beat in all conceivable categories. plus: mcenroe never won the french or australian open. one can hardly be considered the best of all time if they've never even won all the grand slams.i think it's unfair to argue that his competition wasn't the same. surely we know more of the names from the 80s. and he did have to play against borg and connors. i would argue that borg might be the best of all time before i would argue for mcenroe.
4/19/2006 12:35:59 PM
4/19/2006 12:39:10 PM
GretzkyI'm not even a hockey fan and i'll admit it
4/19/2006 12:39:37 PM
back to discussing who dominated their sport the most, i'm gonna plug Alexander Karelin again.....
4/19/2006 1:16:59 PM
4/19/2006 1:23:20 PM
tony hawk
4/19/2006 2:47:42 PM
4/19/2006 2:52:50 PM
4/19/2006 7:03:25 PM
This thread is full of stupidity.Babe Ruth or Wayne Gretzky.Did you know the year Babe broke the HR record with 60 in one season 2nd best was 29 HRs?????He was dominant in every aspect. In today's game he would have hit 1000 HRs with the expansion teams and more lively ball and some small joke stadiums like Minute Maid Park and balls flying out in Coors Field.
4/20/2006 5:02:11 PM
And OMG Josh Gibson. Babe also struck out a whole lot.But does it really matter?
4/20/2006 5:08:33 PM
4/20/2006 6:57:06 PM
Bret Hart
4/20/2006 7:02:08 PM
^The best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be.
4/20/2006 7:37:31 PM
4/20/2006 7:57:07 PM
the dude from japan that wins all the eatting contests
4/20/2006 8:04:14 PM