Point: You are bitching about a section of the site you do not contribute to, except mindless drivel.Point: You want something done about people who post mindless drivel to TT.Point: I think Bobby's moderation is fine. If you want a "PC Q&A" section in addition to TT, suggest that. As it exists now, TT is for all tech-related posts.
8/25/2004 5:09:21 PM
comedy
8/25/2004 5:20:54 PM
my point: anything but mindless drivel would be wasted on tech talk in its current state.and at fault is not just bobbydigital's overall lack of moderation but immaturity in his infrequent bouts of moderation.
8/25/2004 5:22:16 PM
If that's your attitude, then you're exactly right. It's a lost cause, don't try to change it, just stay out. If you want someone else to make TT better so that *you* will feel more at home, keep waiting.
8/25/2004 5:24:03 PM
This amuses me...Tiberius...you belong in one of my classes!
8/25/2004 5:27:13 PM
it's not just a lost cause, it's a flushing commode of posting qualitynobody that honestly has a clue is going to remain in an environment like that for longletting idiots answer eachothers dumb googlefodder questions incorrectly isn't doing them any bit of goodand as more users come to the site and fewer technically apt users remain in tech talk and more idiots get the impression that it's open season on stupidity, it'll continue to degrade in posting qualityif the sort of idiocy that was par for tech talk was attempted in the garage or chit chat even they'd get fucking laughed and flamed off the internet... much less corrected productively and politely... but nobody that knows better even reads tech talk to comment on the apparent room temperature IQ breakdown... because it's so foultech talk in its present form isn't just pointless, it's couterproductive.[Edited on August 25, 2004 at 5:36 PM. Reason : fuck broken punctuation keys and the bad habits they encourage]
8/25/2004 5:32:51 PM
Weren't you saying the "googlefodder" argument isn't valid just a few posts up?Glad you brought up Chit Chat. It's full of heinous douchebaggery, and if I'm not mistaken, you're often at the lead of said douchebaggery. Glad you mentioned the Garage too, remember what happened when the moderator took the stance that opinions contrary to his own deserved locking? Oh, right, there was an outcry here among the people that frequent the forum. Since you admittedly don't contribute anything, and this was spurred by the locking of a thread where you just adding to the pile, I don't see where you have a leg to stand.
8/25/2004 5:39:58 PM
man this was entertaining
8/25/2004 5:53:09 PM
M- i can't really find a point in your last reply that i haven't already covered, so i'm just going to go ahead and ignore it.pg- my sympathies.and now i'm done with this thread
8/25/2004 6:07:30 PM
what a fag
8/25/2004 6:16:38 PM
haha he wasted the better part of 6 hours arguing about something "that he's only posted in 33 times."gg chief.
8/25/2004 6:57:05 PM
don't mix apples w/ oranges bitch
8/25/2004 8:33:31 PM
He does have a point about the googlefodder, but it is negated through his usage of the non-word "irregardless"
8/26/2004 3:58:05 AM
BobbyDigital; there is none greater.
8/26/2004 11:04:49 AM
it.. actually is a word, dude.
8/26/2004 12:00:34 PM
Usage Note: Irregardless is a word that many mistakenly believe to be correct usage in formal style, when in fact it is used chiefly in nonstandard speech or casual writing. Coined in the United States in the early 20th century, it has met with a blizzard of condemnation for being an improper yoking of irrespective and regardless and for the logical absurdity of combining the negative ir- prefix and -less suffix in a single term. Although one might reasonably argue that it is no different from words with redundant affixes like debone and unravel, it has been considered a blunder for decades and will probably continue to be so.
8/26/2004 12:11:39 PM
good thing froshkiller didnt see this thread.
8/26/2004 12:12:21 PM
nor mootduff
8/26/2004 12:31:31 PM
http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=238435
8/26/2004 1:44:29 PM
Humorous.
8/26/2004 6:26:27 PM
i laughed
8/26/2004 6:55:41 PM
8/26/2004 10:41:12 PM
8/26/2004 11:09:00 PM
YO WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS
8/26/2004 11:21:05 PM
Man, I don't visit Feedback for a week and I miss Isn'tTiberius taking out his PMS on everyone.
8/26/2004 11:32:18 PM
incredible
8/26/2004 11:55:17 PM
Wait waitYou make a dumbass thread about googleAND YOU COMLPAIN ABOUT THE QUALITY OF TECH TALKGod, why did I miss this earlier?
9/2/2004 3:42:29 PM
^[asshat]bttt for best feedback forum drama ever
9/6/2004 4:52:37 AM
bttt cause he's trashing other people's threads too[Edited on October 20, 2004 at 7:16 PM. Reason : only second best feedback forum drama ever now though ]
10/20/2004 7:15:44 PM
best thread of the year
10/20/2004 8:46:21 PM
^^^,^^ seeing as how you can't keep a user name unsuspended for 3 days at a time i don't think you're terribly qualified to determine how anyone should moderate[Edited on October 21, 2004 at 12:57 AM. Reason : *]
10/21/2004 12:57:11 AM
moderate my cock'n'balls you fucking flamer
10/21/2004 1:42:31 AM