some interesting theories on here.
7/24/2008 7:00:52 PM
7/24/2008 7:02:56 PM
So I just read all the affidavids and all I've got to say is this whole thing is one giant clusterfuck.
7/24/2008 7:06:09 PM
The only problem with that one is why wouldn't the dude just reverse blackmail her? He'd have more to gain by turning her over to her husband than by killing her. Oh you got me on tape? Well bitch, i got YOU on tape! Who you gonna fuck for money now?!
7/24/2008 7:07:39 PM
That could have just as easily just ended up fucking them both.. so what, rich dude embarrasses her or whatever you wanna call it.. what's she gonna do? retaliate. in the end they'd both end up getting screwed unless one of them couldn't talk because they were dead
7/24/2008 7:32:56 PM
hey, i got a theory: how about: she's gonna divorce him, take his money, take the kids, and leave his ass hanging high and dry. he's already pissed off cause she cheated on him, and now there's this. so he kills her in a fit of rage and tries some weak ass cover story.yeah, i know, i know.... that's just too fucking crazy, isn't it. couldn't be possible. i mean, where's the criminal boyfriend fit in? where's the Nigerian mafia? where's Guido the Killer Pimp?seriously, some of you retards need to put down the bong, and turn off the TV.get outside. get some fresh air.
7/24/2008 7:53:41 PM
they cheated on each other... wouldn't the point be moot? doesn't it all kinda equal out?
7/24/2008 7:57:36 PM
i thought it didi mean, the russian mafia has to be involved, like joe said
7/24/2008 7:57:55 PM
^^^OLD KING DOUCHEBAG HEREIM SMARTER AND A 100 YEARS OLDER THAN YOU FUCKERS SO EVERYTHING I SAY IS RIGHTFUCK YOU AND YOUR LIBERALL COLLEGE HIPPY WAYSEVEN THOUGH WHEN I WAS YOUNG I WAS A BIGGER FUCK UP THAN ALL OF YOU COMBINED[Edited on July 24, 2008 at 8:00 PM. Reason : n]
7/24/2008 7:59:50 PM
panties in a bunch, much?
7/24/2008 8:07:06 PM
RAWR RAWR RAWR ?
7/24/2008 8:09:20 PM
RAWR RAWR
7/24/2008 8:10:21 PM
7/24/2008 8:28:24 PM
rawr
7/24/2008 8:29:56 PM
My theory is that she's had a boyfriend on the side for a while now strictly for fun. After seeing how lucrative kids were during a divorce, she decided to let the other guy knock her up too so she could stick him for another child support payment. The boyfriend, well aware of how much of a golddigging whore the woman was and how costly this was about to become, decided to take care of the situation.It's a long shot theory, but it makes more sense than a husband with all the motive in the world not being taken in for questioning and held for 24 hours after the murder.[Edited on July 24, 2008 at 9:02 PM. Reason : she would have kept the boyfriend a secret for leverage during the divorce.]
7/24/2008 9:01:46 PM
it looks like a random act of violence. usually when the husband is at fault they dont find the body or take several weeks/months to find it. also, knowing the history of this women, I wouldnt be surprised if it was a scorn lover finding out that they werent getting divorced and taking it out on his hoe.
7/24/2008 9:05:36 PM
i cannot believe that settlement agreement. i've never seen anything so awful in my life.
7/24/2008 9:36:54 PM
i def. don't think it's a random act, but my money is on it NOT BEING THE HUSBAND and it being a boyfriend that none of us knows aboutShe hooked up with a guy, while she was married, and doesn't know his name?I don't know a dude in the WORLD that can run game on a married woman well enough to get her in bed who WOULDNT give her his name, number, and way to get up with him later.Because if you can fuck a married woman once, you already broke down that wall and can fuck whenever you want.She didn't know his name? PFFFT, PLEASE. She was most likely still FUCKING him, and he is the one that PROBABLY killed her.
7/24/2008 10:10:51 PM
craziness.
7/24/2008 10:13:12 PM
ok i glanced through a lot of the affidavits and this is just my opinion of what happened:they got married and moved to cary b/c of brad's job......i don't think nancy ever cared to work since brad was making enough...they had the kids and she enjoyed staying home being a housewife and taking care of the kids and hanging out with her friends......she liked attention and didn't want to feel inferior to the other cary wives so she liked showing off by spending lots of money on thingsshe had an affair first.....brad wanted to provide more for the family so he wanted to get an mba...during this time b/c he was busy with his mba and ironman, him and nancy grew more distant..he probably found a more capable woman and had an affair with herthings got progressively worse and nancy started spending more money (whether that's the way she was or to get back at him for not spending time with the family)...the only way brad knew how to curb the debts was to control her spending even if it meant to be extremeshe didn't like his perceived controlling attitude and lost face in front of her friends so she made brad look like the bad guy by telling her stories to her friends.....then she probably thought, if she wasn't getting any money from brad, and he wasn't at home taking care of the kids and helping her, and they both had affairs already, why not get a divorce?brad probably thought this was the best way too and he could finally be free of her and her extravagant spending.....but one thing he didn't realize is how much he would lose financially in the separation agreement (child support, alimony, etc).....that's why he never signed it......and that's why he wanted them to seek counselingi believe he wanted the marriage to work out again and somehow hoped that she would control her spending...but she had already looked forward to getting the divorce settlement......i think the last days leading up to her death they had argued about the settlement and she was forcing brad to sign it and the conditions were too heavily in her favor and he wanted to change some conditions but she refusedbrad eventually got really pissed off and acted out of rage and killed her (or hired someone to)so while she was being guilty of a golddigger and unfortunately the divorce settlement and marital law weighed heavily in her favor, everything was unfair to him but he made the ultimate mistake of killing her no matter how much everything was unfair to himit's just sad for everyone involved
7/24/2008 11:06:58 PM
she was out jogging, and some drunk wolfwebber hit her with his car, killing her instantly.then he freaked out and made a hurried attempt to hide the body at a nearby construction site.then a media circus ensues.i win.
7/24/2008 11:59:33 PM
you win "page 18"... so far.
7/25/2008 12:55:46 AM
probably dnl w/o the car
7/25/2008 12:59:09 AM
nope. cops already checked DNL . his alibi is solid. he was masturbating with some dude from Craigslist right before going to bed.
7/25/2008 1:01:09 AM
7/25/2008 8:18:50 AM
but they told repeatedly who it was that brad had cheated on her with, why not provide him the decency by admitting who the guy was? that is just a little bit odd and unfair to me. also, regarding the settlement, what i find to be the most harsh is that she gets his 401k. from the raping he got it would appear as if he went in with no lawyer at all. one would think that they would make a settlement that at least appears to be fair reasonable not laughably biased.
7/25/2008 9:11:32 AM
^^^ LOL
7/25/2008 9:19:24 AM
WHY THE FUCK DO PEOPLE KEEP SAYING THAT SHE CHEATED ON BRAD (IN THE SENSE OF "HOOKING" UP WITH SOME DUDE)?it may be that misread the affidavit (or that i'm remembering wrong and am too lazy to go back and check, so please correct me if i'm wrong), but wasn't it stated that when she "cheated" on brad it was "non sexual" or something else that was kind of strange? she had a "relationship" with a guy, it doesn't say that she slept with him or gave him a blow job or anything...while brad actually spent the night with some chickam i the only one remembering this? or is all this "she cheated" stuff completely speculative about what happened after the incident mentioned in the affidavit?
7/25/2008 9:20:13 AM
how can you have an 'affair' and not have sex. makes absolutely no sense to me.
7/25/2008 9:21:45 AM
i think people are assuming because she said that she had an extra-marital affair that she slept with the dude. i mean, really, extra-marital affiar without sleeping with him? i'm a little lost as to how that would happen, and what would constitute an affair without it being sexual. plus, her image has been tarnished and women lie about that sort of thing in general and people are using that bridge to infer that she did in fact have sexual relations.
7/25/2008 9:23:58 AM
there is nothing wrong with have 'freinds' of the opposite sex, but for it to be considered an 'affair' i am pretty sure that if i were a betting man i would bet heavily that she had sex with him.
7/25/2008 9:26:05 AM
maybe she just sucked his dick
7/25/2008 9:27:44 AM
oh yeah, i forgot about oral sex.
7/25/2008 9:29:42 AM
also, i would like to reiterate that they won't even share his name. they say that no one knew his name, which is really strange to me. she didn't tell any of these "best" friends what were willing to sign an affidavit who he was? They didn't care to mention this fact?
7/25/2008 9:32:03 AM
Is it just me or do all those plantif affidavits sound very similar, like they were told what to say.
7/25/2008 9:36:40 AM
from the affidavit: http://dig.abclocal.go.com/wtvd/cooper_affidavit.pdf
7/25/2008 9:37:49 AM
I think he was saying that she was emotionaly involved with another man in some capacity
7/25/2008 9:39:59 AM
that is worded so wrongly:
7/25/2008 9:42:20 AM
^^ okay...i would assume that she was emotionally attached to someone, and they spent time together (dates, coffee, whatever) and that they may have kissed or something (though, technically, i'd consider that sexual, just not ridiculously so)...either way, it's hardly the same thing as an affair, per se, so why do people keep acting like she cheated on him (aside from speculation as to what happened that we don't know about)?^ yeah, that's what i mean...sounds like she might have a male friend who was emotionally supportive, and felt that that needed to be shared with her husband for honesty's sake[Edited on July 25, 2008 at 9:44 AM. Reason : .]
7/25/2008 9:43:28 AM
Surprised no one found this yet...Yes, he did attend State and get his MBA. He's on the top-right of the page with his family.http://www.mgt.ncsu.edu/profiles/students/2007/gradfall07/index.php
7/25/2008 9:47:47 AM
7/25/2008 9:48:11 AM
yeah, tdub is slacking in this...a lot of talking back and forth with no pics or quotes!
7/25/2008 9:53:43 AM
hmm, two blond-haired chitlins and two dark-haired parents?? they totally stole those babies.
7/25/2008 10:03:15 AM
or...she dyes her hair and he's not the father
7/25/2008 10:04:05 AM
lol don't you brunettes usually start out as blondes when you're kids.
7/25/2008 10:05:17 AM
7/25/2008 10:05:42 AM
the eyebrows match the parents
7/25/2008 10:06:37 AM
i know! she dyes her daughter's hair blond so they look more perfect i wonder if the carpet matches the curtains???i am so going to hell.
7/25/2008 10:07:11 AM
^^^^ You Peopleoh and
7/25/2008 10:07:36 AM
Brad's affidavit said that no one even knows the guy's name. That means that Nancy never told anyone the guy's name, not that Nancy didn't know the guy's name. You guys are misinterpreting what is being said. Of course Nancy knows who it is, she just never told anyone who it is. Unlike Brad, who came out with the name of that Heather girl as the person he was having an affair with.
7/25/2008 10:09:12 AM