yeah but is it an acronym?
1/27/2012 5:56:46 PM
go local
1/27/2012 5:58:02 PM
all in all it makes for some quality entertainment in small doses
1/27/2012 6:01:39 PM
Amanda Lamb has crazy eyes
1/27/2012 6:29:59 PM
TWW is legion.
1/28/2012 12:11:34 AM
1/28/2012 2:39:29 AM
i'm sticking with the theory that someone here sent them this thread
1/28/2012 9:49:12 AM
Nah. wral has had tww bookmarked for years. Unless you are talking about the defense attorney.
1/28/2012 12:01:18 PM
yes
1/28/2012 12:53:19 PM
I think jtw208 is on to somethingmy money's on ol' yellateef
1/28/2012 12:55:36 PM
fuck the police[Edited on January 28, 2012 at 1:31 PM. Reason : y]
1/28/2012 1:30:05 PM
Just checking in to this part of TWW history after all the newsworthy stuff has already happened.
1/29/2012 10:57:11 PM
Yeah, this thread died quickly. It will get more interesting once the trial starts.
1/30/2012 12:18:45 AM
1/31/2012 2:06:06 PM
1/31/2012 2:07:45 PM
damn.they got mootduff
1/31/2012 2:08:13 PM
I'm not sure how they're going to keep this one from going into a mistrial again.And do they honestly think that jurors in other trials didn't talk about it? I mean, how many of those Cooper jurors do you think actually made it through 12 weeks without mentioning it at all? or doing any research at all?
1/31/2012 2:17:05 PM
i don't like the way they made it sound like begonias was dismissed for talking about the case online. she was dismissed first then they found out she wrote about it[Edited on January 31, 2012 at 2:18 PM. Reason : -]
1/31/2012 2:17:34 PM
Damn they got 3 of them... at least we have one more man on the inside
1/31/2012 2:33:02 PM
Allegedly the guy was talking about it in a restaurant in Garner. I wonder who snitched on him and what evidence did they have? Did they record it or something?
1/31/2012 2:38:00 PM
begonias, they can't get the facts straight
1/31/2012 2:43:43 PM
WRAL has never been known for accuracy in reporting. Especially if it makes TWW, (or defendants, etc) look bad.
1/31/2012 2:45:57 PM
The comments are killing me - Sayer never talked about it once he got picked, so why the f do people keep commenting about jurors keeping their mouths shut? People.
1/31/2012 2:47:00 PM
I hope sayer doesn't hate tww now
1/31/2012 2:51:41 PM
I don't think he's posted since
1/31/2012 2:56:36 PM
site_premium.aspx
1/31/2012 3:01:00 PM
^^lol actually he has. had a post in sports talk like 2 days ago[Edited on January 31, 2012 at 3:01 PM. Reason : -]
1/31/2012 3:01:06 PM
i hope they don't found out we LOLed em all.so much is at stake
1/31/2012 7:38:27 PM
^How did we lol them exactly?
1/31/2012 8:18:02 PM
It's annoying to see the news outlets putting out wrong information. They always want to seem like "oh we caught the bad guys - we tell you the news." Dear WRAL, get your facts straight.
1/31/2012 8:24:31 PM
Sayer is going to have survivor guilt when they execute this guy. He could have been the one sane juror that saved him.
1/31/2012 8:53:31 PM
Dear WRAL,Amanda Lamb is the most unethical hack of a reporter ever.
1/31/2012 9:03:41 PM
What pisses me off is WRAL gets away with not getting accused of libel by simply referring to begonias as a juror in the jury pool. They never dismissed her because of the website - she was dismissed days prior [Edited on January 31, 2012 at 11:22 PM. Reason : Boycotting wral]
1/31/2012 11:21:17 PM
How do you dismiss a dismissed juror?[Edited on January 31, 2012 at 11:22 PM. Reason : asking wral]
1/31/2012 11:22:27 PM
At least the N&O reported it correctly: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/01/1820869/second-juror-is-dismissed-in-jason.htmlOn a side note, I think it's a really shitty thing for the media to do, to publish a dismissed juror's name.
2/1/2012 8:05:33 AM
Aww hell, they used his powerword.
2/1/2012 9:41:27 AM
http://www.wral.com/specialreports/michelleyoung/story/10676540/And jury selection is complete. 8 women, 4 men.
2/2/2012 11:49:44 AM
twice as many girls as guys, prosecution must like that]
2/2/2012 2:54:02 PM
ITT, synapse misunderstands ratios
2/2/2012 2:56:05 PM
lol. i saw it before the edit.
2/2/2012 3:00:33 PM
ahahaThey aren't taking any chances this time. The trial is a formality at this point.
2/2/2012 3:06:25 PM
Bump for opening statements this morning.
2/6/2012 7:42:32 AM
The Judge read the name of juror number 1 earlier on camera. Better dismiss him now, we know who he is!
2/6/2012 10:18:30 AM
[quote]We need the best jurors ever, not the worst jurors ever[quote]hahaha
2/6/2012 10:23:47 AM
2/6/2012 10:32:18 AM
They aren't allowed to research.
2/6/2012 10:35:52 AM
Just because you aren't allowed to research doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
2/6/2012 10:36:20 AM
But as a juror, should you happen to do some research, discover a problem with the case, and bring it to the Judge's attention what would happen?
2/6/2012 10:38:04 AM
Why would they be stupid enough to bring it to the Judge's attention?
2/6/2012 10:39:22 AM
You'd be found in contempt of court. That's why you don't say shit to the judge and vote the way you feel is right in the closed room.
2/6/2012 10:39:36 AM